How does Lenovo quality compare to IBM's proven reputation
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:07 am
Just a question I have had while shopping for a new notebook computer...
I have read reviews from many sources over the years--and recently still---that support IBM's leadership for reliability with their brand of notebook computers among tech support companies and users.
Consistently year after year the IBM Thinkpad brand always leads the other PC-based notebook brands like: Dell, Gateway, HP, Compaq, etc...with only Apple edging them out as #1 "overall", but
now the ratings refer to IBM as Lenovo-IBM, and brings to mind a question since IBM and Lenovo Brand notebook computers are both available to purchase as separate brand notebooks (Office Depot sells both).
Lenovo now owns IBM, and even though the IBM Thinkpads are still being produced and maintain their reputation for excellence, how does the Lenovo notebook reliability stack up to the IBM?
Lenovo was a separate brand of notebook computer before they merged with IBM, so aren't Lenovo notebooks still basically a different brand from the Thinkpad family?
Lenovo "inherited" the IBM Thinkpads' reputation for reliability, as this track record was earned by IBM prior to the merger. Since Lenovo now owns IBM, how can the Lenovo brand notebook
"automatically" have that same reputation bestowed upon their brand as well?
True, Lenovo Notebooks seem to give you more bang for the buck--(similar pricing difference as is found between an Intel and AMD machine or between an Acer brand compared to a Sony) but can the Lenovo be considered "an IBM notebook at a cheaper price", and have the same assumed reputation for quality and reliability that IBM is known for, simply because Lenovo owns IBM now?
Any opinions?
I have read reviews from many sources over the years--and recently still---that support IBM's leadership for reliability with their brand of notebook computers among tech support companies and users.
Consistently year after year the IBM Thinkpad brand always leads the other PC-based notebook brands like: Dell, Gateway, HP, Compaq, etc...with only Apple edging them out as #1 "overall", but
now the ratings refer to IBM as Lenovo-IBM, and brings to mind a question since IBM and Lenovo Brand notebook computers are both available to purchase as separate brand notebooks (Office Depot sells both).
Lenovo now owns IBM, and even though the IBM Thinkpads are still being produced and maintain their reputation for excellence, how does the Lenovo notebook reliability stack up to the IBM?
Lenovo was a separate brand of notebook computer before they merged with IBM, so aren't Lenovo notebooks still basically a different brand from the Thinkpad family?
Lenovo "inherited" the IBM Thinkpads' reputation for reliability, as this track record was earned by IBM prior to the merger. Since Lenovo now owns IBM, how can the Lenovo brand notebook
"automatically" have that same reputation bestowed upon their brand as well?
True, Lenovo Notebooks seem to give you more bang for the buck--(similar pricing difference as is found between an Intel and AMD machine or between an Acer brand compared to a Sony) but can the Lenovo be considered "an IBM notebook at a cheaper price", and have the same assumed reputation for quality and reliability that IBM is known for, simply because Lenovo owns IBM now?
Any opinions?