Y410p resolution -- 1366x768 or 1600x900

IdeaPad series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
SteveDC
Freshman Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Washington, DC

Y410p resolution -- 1366x768 or 1600x900

#1 Post by SteveDC » Tue Oct 15, 2013 5:44 pm

This model has a 14" screen and will be used by a teen mostly for gaming and once in a while for typing school assignments. Any thoughts on which display is better?

Searching, I see pros and cons for both. Thinking since mostly doing gaming, go with higher res.

AnakiMana
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:56 pm
Location: Richland, WA

Re: Y410p resolution -- 1366x768 or 1600x900

#2 Post by AnakiMana » Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:43 pm

In my opinion, stay away from the lower resolution screen unless the user has bad vision. Even then, you could choose the better screen and change the DPI setting in Windows to 125% to make reading things easier.

The only benefit I can think of for lower resolution is that the GPU doesn't have as much work to do while gaming, so frame rates would be better when really pushing things.
I personally would be annoyed with 1366x768.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

ZaZ
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Y410p resolution -- 1366x768 or 1600x900

#3 Post by ZaZ » Wed Oct 16, 2013 5:11 am

Personally, I can't tell the difference between HD and HD+.
ProBook 470 G3

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6846
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

Re: Y410p resolution -- 1366x768 or 1600x900

#4 Post by dr_st » Thu Oct 17, 2013 3:12 am

I would prefer HD+, because I do need as much space as I can get on the screen, both horizontally and vertically.

But in your situation, I actually think HD may be a better choice, since it will only occasionally be used for work. And for gaming, on a 14" screen - HD vs HD+ is not that big of a diff in quality, but may be a big diff in frame rates, so on the HD+ screen, the user may end up bumping the resolution down, and then what's the point?
Current: X220 4291-4BG, T410 2537-R46, T60 1952-F76, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G
Collectibles: T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X32 (IPS Screen)
Retired: X61 7673-V2V, A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
Past: Z61t 9440-A23, T60 2623-D3U, X32 2884-M5U

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8408
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Y410p resolution -- 1366x768 or 1600x900

#5 Post by pianowizard » Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:28 am

SteveDC wrote:Thinking since mostly doing gaming, go with higher res.
Your main concern should be whether this teen's school assignments (and anything else involving text) would benefit from 1600x900. 1600x900 has 37.3 % more pixels than 1366x768, meaning you can viewing 37.3% more text on the screen. If this person likes to view two windows side by side (e.g. reading a PDF document on the left, while typing a report about it on the right), or prefers to scroll less, then 1600x900 is the one to get, because it would enable him/her to work more efficiently.

There is another potential advantage of going for the 1600x900. Manufacturers tend to, though not always, use the lowest-quality (i.e. cheapest) panels for 1366x768, but use somewhat higher-quality ones for higher resolutions. "Quality" refers to color quality, viewing angles, and contrast. The rationale behind this is that they assume people opting for 1366x768 to be cheapskates who don't care about quality.

Images (e.g. gaming) do benefit from higher res, but the improvement is marginal.
HP Pavilion x2 12 (Core M3-6Y30, 1920x1280, 3.14 lb); Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700, 1920x1280, 2.0 lb)
Dell OptiPlex 5040 SFF (Core i5-6600); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “IdeaPad Series Laptops”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest