Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
X300 and Lenovo site
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:19 am
- Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls, Canada
X300 and Lenovo site
Greetings all!
I have recently re-discovered Lenovos and can't believe how incredible these machines are. As a past owner of Toshiba, Viao, Acer, Asus, Dell et. al IMO Lenovo are miles ahead of the competition.
Now to the crux of my problem. I own several machines, a pair of x230T, an x131e, and finally my beloved X300. At the Lenovo site, after installing the Lenovo service bridge on my X230T and x131e, the machines are correctly identified and automatic updates work properly.
Not so with my X300. My serial number isn't even recognized, which I find really strange, so I can't get the site to perform updates, show drivers, etc. Even using google and trying to track down data on my x300 the results are lacking compared to my other models. Do I have an x300 with an issue or is the support for the x300 lacking compared to my x230T/x131e?
TIA for any help you can offer.
PS. Even though the x300 doesn't compare power wise to my other models considering the era it is from, I'm amazed at the features it has, the size and incredible light weight, the general ergonomics, a burner!, the beautiful screen with a great resolution, etc. I can plainly see why it was a premium model back in the day. I've read it retailed for $3000 or so. Is that correct?
I have recently re-discovered Lenovos and can't believe how incredible these machines are. As a past owner of Toshiba, Viao, Acer, Asus, Dell et. al IMO Lenovo are miles ahead of the competition.
Now to the crux of my problem. I own several machines, a pair of x230T, an x131e, and finally my beloved X300. At the Lenovo site, after installing the Lenovo service bridge on my X230T and x131e, the machines are correctly identified and automatic updates work properly.
Not so with my X300. My serial number isn't even recognized, which I find really strange, so I can't get the site to perform updates, show drivers, etc. Even using google and trying to track down data on my x300 the results are lacking compared to my other models. Do I have an x300 with an issue or is the support for the x300 lacking compared to my x230T/x131e?
TIA for any help you can offer.
PS. Even though the x300 doesn't compare power wise to my other models considering the era it is from, I'm amazed at the features it has, the size and incredible light weight, the general ergonomics, a burner!, the beautiful screen with a great resolution, etc. I can plainly see why it was a premium model back in the day. I've read it retailed for $3000 or so. Is that correct?
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 23825
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:17 am
- Location: Loch Garman, Éire
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
Welcome to the Forum.
Drivers etc. here: https://download.lenovo.com/eol/index.html
Drivers etc. here: https://download.lenovo.com/eol/index.html
Lovely day for a Guinness! (The Real Black Stuff)
Lenovo: X240, X250, T440p, T480, M900 Tiny.
PS: the old Boardroom website is still available on the Wayback Machine.
Lenovo: X240, X250, T440p, T480, M900 Tiny.
PS: the old Boardroom website is still available on the Wayback Machine.
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
They were supposed to be MacBook killers, but failed to accomplish that mission. I'm glad that you like the screen but most people - myself included - were not crazy about it, and that's putting it mildly. As for the original retail, yes, it was somewhere in the neighbourhood of $3K.wallythacker wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 11:43 am
PS. Even though the x300 doesn't compare power wise to my other models considering the era it is from, I'm amazed at the features it has, the size and incredible light weight, the general ergonomics, a burner!, the beautiful screen with a great resolution, etc. I can plainly see why it was a premium model back in the day. I've read it retailed for $3000 or so. Is that correct?
Very well-built little machine nevertheless. One of the "expensive-feeling" ThinkPads IMO.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
I am still using my X301 and for most things it still does the job. The screen is an interesting one but I am happy with it and I use calibrate display colour in windows to tune it. Basically all my other setups are desktops or docked laptops. I have been using the X301 for 5 years and I am not ready to pass on it yet.
Active --- Love the X series
X301 W 7/Mint | X201 540M L Mint | X220 2520 W7/Mint
Nostalgia
X61 T7500 / T41 T42 T43 / A31
Rogue daily driver - Samsung RV511 15.6 " Screen - W 7
X301 W 7/Mint | X201 540M L Mint | X220 2520 W7/Mint
Nostalgia
X61 T7500 / T41 T42 T43 / A31
Rogue daily driver - Samsung RV511 15.6 " Screen - W 7
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
I'm typing this on my X301. I've got the SU9600 version with 8GB of RAM and the original Samsung 64GB SLC drive. Middleton's unlocked/SLIC/DualIDA BIOS. I still think it's the nicest thinkpad ever. It's got the traditional clamshell design for the lid, lid latches, decent keyboard, high resolution tall (16:10) screen and all the administrative stuff that makes a Thinkpad (such adjusting the charging threshold for the battery). It's one of the few models with 3x3 MIMO antennas. And on top of that, it's very lightweight and well constructed.
However, it's not without it's faults:
1) It's dog slow for anything too demanding and it's not surprising: the X30x series was never a great performer, even when it was released. Lenovo selected an ULV chip (which is appropriate for the kind of machine) but it did so at a time ULV chips simply sucked. You have to keep in mind that this was right before intel switched to modern, integrated Core platform with CPU/NB/GPU all in one package. This alone cut several watts of power consumption and improved memory access and graphics performance greatly. The Penryn / Montevina platform consists of two chips: the CPU itself (10W) and the NB/GPU (12). So 22W overall.
Having said that, it's still very useful in 2021. I can watch youtube videos without a problem (4500MHD has video acceleration) and, if you use Firefox + NoScript, the CPU is more than enough for regular browsing (most of the time CPU usage is under 10%). Actually, I'm yet to find a task I can't do with it; with the obvious exception of heavy data processing.
2) The screen has horrible viewing angles and contrast. I recently cleaned my screen with isopropyl alcohol and some of it got sucked into the screen. Then I realized there is really nothing wrong with the screen itself: on the parts the alcohol was sucked in, it improved light transmission and the colors were vivid and bright. So my theory is that, being the very first generation of LED displays, they didn't quite nailed the backlight design and materials (screens have layers of difussing material and a final light insulating one). I bet the screen is so thin, you can see light from the back when it's on (it shouln't). Which leads me to believe that refurbishing the screen with better materials would lead to a much more decent image quality.
3) Battery could last longer. This is right on Lenovo. Thinkpads with battery on the front have always had poor capacities. It sacrifices the ability to use an extended version that protudes from the laptop to get more juice. Mine is the original one, manufactured in 2009 and still holds 37 Wh. 125 cycles.
All in all, I believe that if they had waited until Sandy Bridge to release the X300, people would have had a much different opinion about it.
However, it's not without it's faults:
1) It's dog slow for anything too demanding and it's not surprising: the X30x series was never a great performer, even when it was released. Lenovo selected an ULV chip (which is appropriate for the kind of machine) but it did so at a time ULV chips simply sucked. You have to keep in mind that this was right before intel switched to modern, integrated Core platform with CPU/NB/GPU all in one package. This alone cut several watts of power consumption and improved memory access and graphics performance greatly. The Penryn / Montevina platform consists of two chips: the CPU itself (10W) and the NB/GPU (12). So 22W overall.
Having said that, it's still very useful in 2021. I can watch youtube videos without a problem (4500MHD has video acceleration) and, if you use Firefox + NoScript, the CPU is more than enough for regular browsing (most of the time CPU usage is under 10%). Actually, I'm yet to find a task I can't do with it; with the obvious exception of heavy data processing.
2) The screen has horrible viewing angles and contrast. I recently cleaned my screen with isopropyl alcohol and some of it got sucked into the screen. Then I realized there is really nothing wrong with the screen itself: on the parts the alcohol was sucked in, it improved light transmission and the colors were vivid and bright. So my theory is that, being the very first generation of LED displays, they didn't quite nailed the backlight design and materials (screens have layers of difussing material and a final light insulating one). I bet the screen is so thin, you can see light from the back when it's on (it shouln't). Which leads me to believe that refurbishing the screen with better materials would lead to a much more decent image quality.
3) Battery could last longer. This is right on Lenovo. Thinkpads with battery on the front have always had poor capacities. It sacrifices the ability to use an extended version that protudes from the laptop to get more juice. Mine is the original one, manufactured in 2009 and still holds 37 Wh. 125 cycles.
All in all, I believe that if they had waited until Sandy Bridge to release the X300, people would have had a much different opinion about it.
X301: SU9600 | 8GB | 1TB | WXGA+
X1C5: 7600U | 16GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C9: 1145G7 | 16GB | 1TB | WUXGA | WWAN
X1Y8: 1365U | 32GB | 1TB | WUXGA
P14s G1 AMD: 4750U | 32GB | 1TB | PG FHD Touch
T14 G2: 1145G7 | 32GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C5: 7600U | 16GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C9: 1145G7 | 16GB | 1TB | WUXGA | WWAN
X1Y8: 1365U | 32GB | 1TB | WUXGA
P14s G1 AMD: 4750U | 32GB | 1TB | PG FHD Touch
T14 G2: 1145G7 | 32GB | 1TB | FHD
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
The X301 is one of my favourite ThinkPads ever. I think only the 600X beats it out. I had my screen replaced with an AFFS unit a while ago, which at least made it useable.
These days I've gone back to using a desktop but I still cherish my ThinkPad collection, with my X301 being one of the crowning jewels.
Also in terms of expensive feeling, the X301 and X1 and very similar in case anyone is looking for that kind of experience but with a faster CPU.
These days I've gone back to using a desktop but I still cherish my ThinkPad collection, with my X301 being one of the crowning jewels.
Also in terms of expensive feeling, the X301 and X1 and very similar in case anyone is looking for that kind of experience but with a faster CPU.
Daily: Custom Mini-ITX (Ryzen 5, A2000 12GB, 3:2)
ThinkPads: 600X (i3), A31p (FlexView), T43, T60 (FlexView), T61p (4:3), R61 (QXGA), X301 (AFFS), W500, X1
ThinkPads: 600X (i3), A31p (FlexView), T43, T60 (FlexView), T61p (4:3), R61 (QXGA), X301 (AFFS), W500, X1
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 3831
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 am
- Location: Metro Manila, Philippines
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
Too bad the X1 has the chiclet keyboard and a screen with even less pixels than the X301.
Planned Purchase: T480s i5-8350 FHD Touch
Impulse Buy: Thinkpad not named for safety reasons
RIP: X220 4291-C91 X61 7676-A24 760XD-U9E
Impulse Buy: Thinkpad not named for safety reasons
RIP: X220 4291-C91 X61 7676-A24 760XD-U9E
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
You mean, the 600 series keyboard beats everything else (even those who have learned to appreciate the "classic" keyboard of the T420, would drop their jaws if they were given a 600X to type on). If I remember correctly, even the Trackpoint was better. It was just the fugly cap it originally came with what sucked; with a soft dome it was a delight to use.600X wrote: ↑Mon Jul 26, 2021 6:36 pmThe X301 is one of my favourite ThinkPads ever. I think only the 600X beats it out. I had my screen replaced with an AFFS unit a while ago, which at least made it useable.
These days I've gone back to using a desktop but I still cherish my ThinkPad collection, with my X301 being one of the crowning jewels.
Also in terms of expensive feeling, the X301 and X1 and very similar in case anyone is looking for that kind of experience but with a faster CPU.
Back in the day I had a 600E and I loved it. I loved it being built like a tank. I loved it having just about the optimal format, both for size and shape of the screen and the size of the machine itself. I loved it so much, I quickly went hunting for a 600X. And when I got my hands one one, I fully maxed it out. I do remember it came before WIFI was an option but it had a Mini PCI slot with a modem card you could remove to add a WIFI one (the chassis had enough space on it to fit the antennas too). I had a 3Com PCMCIA 10/100 Ethernet that retracted when not in use. I don't remember well, but I believe it had some amount of RAM soldered into the mainboard and two slots. So I either put 512MB or sightly above that. Not sure. But I do remember 256MB PC100 DIMMs was the most it could handle in each slot (512MB was on the low side for running XP).
Thing is, despite its virtues, the 600 series had many issues. Some were simple. For example, the flaps covering the ports were nice, but always ended up breaking, so basically useless. Or that the CMOS battery ran of of juice quickly and had to be replaced often. But some were simply outrageous, like the fact that the main battery just plain sucked. They didn't last long to begin with, but the main issue is that they were always failing. At one moment the power meter said they had 80% of charge left and the next it was completely depleted.
In a portable device, battery performance is not secondary, but a core consideration. That's why I politely disagree on the 600X being the nicest Thinkpad ever.
X301: SU9600 | 8GB | 1TB | WXGA+
X1C5: 7600U | 16GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C9: 1145G7 | 16GB | 1TB | WUXGA | WWAN
X1Y8: 1365U | 32GB | 1TB | WUXGA
P14s G1 AMD: 4750U | 32GB | 1TB | PG FHD Touch
T14 G2: 1145G7 | 32GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C5: 7600U | 16GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C9: 1145G7 | 16GB | 1TB | WUXGA | WWAN
X1Y8: 1365U | 32GB | 1TB | WUXGA
P14s G1 AMD: 4750U | 32GB | 1TB | PG FHD Touch
T14 G2: 1145G7 | 32GB | 1TB | FHD
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
The keyboard on the X1 is actually better than the X301, except when it comes to the layout. Since my X301 has the AFFS screen, the amount of pixels is actually lower (1280x800), but I'll take that any day over a TN panel.axur-delmeria wrote: ↑Mon Jul 26, 2021 8:11 pmToo bad the X1 has the chiclet keyboard and a screen with even less pixels than the X301.
Apart from the port flaps breaking, I never had any of the issues you mentioned In any case my 600X has had a Dell board with an i3 in it for some time, along with a more modern display, so the only real downside on my device is the low resolution. I really liked the original 600X, but even with the 850MHz CPU mine had, it was essentially obsolete by 2012, so losing some original features like the good DAC is a small price to pay for actually being able to use it today. As a complete package, I can't think of a better ThinkPad. Still, I can understand if there are other devices you might like more. The A31p is very nice too for example.mikemex wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 12:31 amYou mean, the 600 series keyboard beats everything else (even those who have learned to appreciate the "classic" keyboard of the T420, would drop their jaws if they were given a 600X to type on). If I remember correctly, even the Trackpoint was better. It was just the fugly cap it originally came with what sucked; with a soft dome it was a delight to use.
Back in the day I had a 600E and I loved it. I loved it being built like a tank. I loved it having just about the optimal format, both for size and shape of the screen and the size of the machine itself. I loved it so much, I quickly went hunting for a 600X. And when I got my hands one one, I fully maxed it out. I do remember it came before WIFI was an option but it had a Mini PCI slot with a modem card you could remove to add a WIFI one (the chassis had enough space on it to fit the antennas too). I had a 3Com PCMCIA 10/100 Ethernet that retracted when not in use. I don't remember well, but I believe it had some amount of RAM soldered into the mainboard and two slots. So I either put 512MB or sightly above that. Not sure. But I do remember 256MB PC100 DIMMs was the most it could handle in each slot (512MB was on the low side for running XP).
Thing is, despite its virtues, the 600 series had many issues. Some were simple. For example, the flaps covering the ports were nice, but always ended up breaking, so basically useless. Or that the CMOS battery ran of of juice quickly and had to be replaced often. But some were simply outrageous, like the fact that the main battery just plain sucked. They didn't last long to begin with, but the main issue is that they were always failing. At one moment the power meter said they had 80% of charge left and the next it was completely depleted.
In a portable device, battery performance is not secondary, but a core consideration. That's why I politely disagree on the 600X being the nicest Thinkpad ever.
Last edited by 600X on Tue Jul 27, 2021 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daily: Custom Mini-ITX (Ryzen 5, A2000 12GB, 3:2)
ThinkPads: 600X (i3), A31p (FlexView), T43, T60 (FlexView), T61p (4:3), R61 (QXGA), X301 (AFFS), W500, X1
ThinkPads: 600X (i3), A31p (FlexView), T43, T60 (FlexView), T61p (4:3), R61 (QXGA), X301 (AFFS), W500, X1
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
Weird, because it's a well known problem.
Never heard about that mod. Is there a place I can read more about it?600X wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:10 amIn any case my 600X has had a Dell board with an i3 in it for some time, along with a more modern display, so the only real downside on my device is the low resolution. I really liked the original 600X, but even with the 850MHz CPU mine had, it was essentially obsolete by 2012, so losing some original features like the good DAC is a small price to pay for actually being able to use it today. As a complete package, I can't think of a better ThinkPad.
X301: SU9600 | 8GB | 1TB | WXGA+
X1C5: 7600U | 16GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C9: 1145G7 | 16GB | 1TB | WUXGA | WWAN
X1Y8: 1365U | 32GB | 1TB | WUXGA
P14s G1 AMD: 4750U | 32GB | 1TB | PG FHD Touch
T14 G2: 1145G7 | 32GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C5: 7600U | 16GB | 1TB | FHD
X1C9: 1145G7 | 16GB | 1TB | WUXGA | WWAN
X1Y8: 1365U | 32GB | 1TB | WUXGA
P14s G1 AMD: 4750U | 32GB | 1TB | PG FHD Touch
T14 G2: 1145G7 | 32GB | 1TB | FHD
Re: X300 and Lenovo site
Maybe I was lucky but I had 2 batteries back in the day and both worked reliably, each providing about 2.5h of battery life back in 2011. They were genuine IBM units. I was running Windows 2000 if that makes any difference.
It's one of two conversions built by el-sahef, an absolute ThinkPad mastermind. He pioneered mods such as the Quad Core T61 and many others. He wrote up a little summary here: https://thinkpad-forum.de/threads/21027 ... ost1947439
Daily: Custom Mini-ITX (Ryzen 5, A2000 12GB, 3:2)
ThinkPads: 600X (i3), A31p (FlexView), T43, T60 (FlexView), T61p (4:3), R61 (QXGA), X301 (AFFS), W500, X1
ThinkPads: 600X (i3), A31p (FlexView), T43, T60 (FlexView), T61p (4:3), R61 (QXGA), X301 (AFFS), W500, X1
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
1 or 2 X1 Extreme's for sale plus S30 and X300's
by BillMorrow » Sat Nov 25, 2023 5:15 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 8 Replies
- 2437 Views
-
Last post by BillMorrow
Mon Dec 04, 2023 4:56 am
-
-
-
I have a Lenovo Legion - I know it's not a thinkpad, but I have a question
by whoknows88 » Mon Nov 27, 2023 7:48 pm » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 5 Replies
- 3153 Views
-
Last post by whoknows88
Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:20 am
-
-
-
Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme Gen 3 black screen issue
by klwthe3rd » Mon Dec 11, 2023 9:29 am » in ThinkPad X1 / X1-Carbon / X1-Extreme and later Series - 2 Replies
- 3032 Views
-
Last post by klwthe3rd
Fri Dec 15, 2023 7:45 am
-
-
-
Confused what NVME adapter is compatible with my Lenovo Thinkpad T480
by Cyber Akuma » Sat Dec 30, 2023 7:32 pm » in ThinkPad T430-T490 / T530-T590 Series - 1 Replies
- 2155 Views
-
Last post by RealBlackStuff
Sun Dec 31, 2023 1:17 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests