X200 vs X220
X200 vs X220
Hi, everyone, just had a couple of questions, I was looking at the X series of thinkpads, what really caught my eye was the portability and battery life of these units. I am a student on a budget with an okay amount of options, my original budget was $500 USD. However I saw that the X200 can be bought for as little as 150 to 200. with a Core 2 duo processor at 2.4 GHz versus the X220 at around 450-500 with an I5. Other than the speed and power consumption efficiency of the sandy bridge. Can I expect any real advantages with the X220 that is worth the price jump of double the X200. My primary use is office word with the occasional movie and mostly web browsing. I tried out the trackpoint at the store the other day and doesn't seem to bother me that the X200 doesn't have a track pad. I also saw how abundantly there are spare parts for the X200 and genuine batteries are rather cheap. So I was curious, if the X200 would be good enough for the next 2-3 years of school i have left for web browsing and office. The money saved with the X200 would be put to upgrading my desktop with an I5 3570k processor. So any thoughts or opinions would be appreciated thanks.
edit: also how much battery life can i expect with 50% brightness and just word office up on the X200? 9 or 6 cell battery
edit: also how much battery life can i expect with 50% brightness and just word office up on the X200? 9 or 6 cell battery
-
Tasurinchi
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:38 am
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: X200 vs X220
Welcome to the forum!
Since you mention Word I guess the slightly higher vertical resolution of the X200 will be a plus as well. Even if you get a low resolution model you will still have 1280x800 instead of 1366x768 the X220 has.
My 2 cents...
An X200 will be enough for this type of usage IMO. Eventually you could find an 1440x900 (WXGA+) X200s for little more budget.jax33 wrote:My primary use is office word with the occasional movie and mostly web browsing
Since you mention Word I guess the slightly higher vertical resolution of the X200 will be a plus as well. Even if you get a low resolution model you will still have 1280x800 instead of 1366x768 the X220 has.
My 2 cents...
Last edited by Tasurinchi on Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
IBM Convertible 5140/L40SX/220/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: X200 vs X220
The X200 is limited to 1280x800. Get an X200s with 1440x900 instead.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Re: X200 vs X220
I see that the X200S has a slower clock speed, would this affect any 1080p playback? my friend has a laptop with similar specs to the X200 and can play the 1080p fine with the X4500MHD and core 2 duo at 2.4Ghz, most of my Mp4 files are 1080p although i know that the X200 can not display 1080p.
-
Tasurinchi
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:38 am
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: X200 vs X220
I forgot to mention one thing (which I don't know if it's important for you).
X200s with 1440x900 screen have no webcam and cannot be upgraded with one either.
X200 with 1280x800 either have an integrated webcam or can be upgraded later.
X200s with 1440x900 screen have no webcam and cannot be upgraded with one either.
X200 with 1280x800 either have an integrated webcam or can be upgraded later.
IBM Convertible 5140/L40SX/220/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
Re: X200 vs X220
oh that is a deal breaker for me, i use a webcam quite a bit for group work, i saw that there are kits for the X200s http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-For-IBM-Len ... 460955d2f9 web cam kits, this doesn't work i guess?Tasurinchi wrote:I forgot to mention one thing (which I don't know if it's important for you).
X200s with 1440x900 screen have no webcam and cannot be upgraded with one either.
X200 with 1280x800 either have an integrated webcam or can be upgraded later.
-
Tasurinchi
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:38 am
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: X200 vs X220
It was my understanding that the 1440x900 screen bezel has no place to accommodate the webcam. Those kits will work on X200s with "standard" 1280x800 resolution though
IBM Convertible 5140/L40SX/220/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
Re: X200 vs X220
alright, thank you for the input, much appreciated, it's nice to have a bigger resolution although right now i'm using a 1024 x 768 with a P4 2.8 Ghz processor, so anything for me is an upgrade.Tasurinchi wrote:It was my understanding that the 1440x900 screen bezel has no place to accommodate the webcam. Those kits will work on X200s with "standard" 1280x800 resolution though
-
Tasurinchi
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:38 am
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: X200 vs X220
I have a couple of X200(s) with both 1280x800 and 1440x900 models and I like both of them. I'm not sure that an X200 cannot handle 1080p, if I have time I will try watching one at home later today.
IBM Convertible 5140/L40SX/220/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
Re: X200 vs X220
alright thanks, look forward to purchasing one soon, hope it can last me at least 2 yearsTasurinchi wrote:I have a couple of X200(s) with both 1280x800 and 1440x900 models and I like both of them. I'm not sure that an X200 cannot handle 1080p, if I have time I will try watching one at home later today.
-
Tasurinchi
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:38 am
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: X200 vs X220
I just watched Tron Legacy (1920x1080) and Dredd (1920x800) in my X200 without any stuttering or any other issue at all. I'm running Linux Mint 13 (LTS version) 64bits with all latest updates and I was using VLC to watch the movies
This particular X200 has a P8600 CPU, 8GB RAM and a Crucial M4 SSD (and a gorgeous AFFS screen
)
I was also watching some 1080p trailers in Youtube. No issues either...
So I'm pretty sure any good spec X200 with proper software installation will be able to cope any HD videos.
Hope this helps! Happy hunting!
Cheers
T
This particular X200 has a P8600 CPU, 8GB RAM and a Crucial M4 SSD (and a gorgeous AFFS screen
I was also watching some 1080p trailers in Youtube. No issues either...
So I'm pretty sure any good spec X200 with proper software installation will be able to cope any HD videos.
Hope this helps! Happy hunting!
Cheers
T
IBM Convertible 5140/L40SX/220/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
A20p/A22p/A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T40x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/12*X2xx/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
Re: X200 vs X220
One thing I did notice on my X200(P8600 I think) versus my X220i(i3-2310M) is my X220i can watch 1080p rips in low power mode while the X200 had to kicked up to adaptive CPU mode for smooth playback, which could make it more noisy at times.
I think both are terrific notebooks. If you've got the cash the things that set the X220 apart is it can give you are an IPS screen option, which is nice for movies with the color and angles. You can also do two drives with with the mSATA SSD and 7mm hard drive, which go up to 1TB. When I can my X200 and X200T, I had a 80GB SSD in them. While it was plenty fast, I disliked having to attach my external hard drive every time I needed a file.
The X200s does offer a WGXA+ option, but the screen itself while plenty bright is average quality wise. I personally don't think it's enough of a space increase to warrant a downgrade in quality, though I know some here would disagree. I guess it would depend on where you stand on the matter.
I think both are terrific notebooks. If you've got the cash the things that set the X220 apart is it can give you are an IPS screen option, which is nice for movies with the color and angles. You can also do two drives with with the mSATA SSD and 7mm hard drive, which go up to 1TB. When I can my X200 and X200T, I had a 80GB SSD in them. While it was plenty fast, I disliked having to attach my external hard drive every time I needed a file.
The X200s does offer a WGXA+ option, but the screen itself while plenty bright is average quality wise. I personally don't think it's enough of a space increase to warrant a downgrade in quality, though I know some here would disagree. I guess it would depend on where you stand on the matter.
E7440
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Recase a X220 into an X220i?
by T3f4l » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:22 am » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 4 Replies
- 871 Views
-
Last post by T3f4l
Sat Jan 07, 2017 8:43 am
-
-
-
Replacement for X220: X260 or E470? Or something else?
by awebber » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:48 am » in ThinkPad X230 and later Series - 13 Replies
- 1311 Views
-
Last post by mj0
Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:20 pm
-
-
-
X220/X230 to flash or not to flash coreboot after FHD mod
by carcuevas » Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:14 am » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 22 Replies
- 3427 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:34 am
-
-
-
ThinkPad X220 gaming benchmarks and graphics benchmarks
by PaulBrause » Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:34 pm » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 4 Replies
- 1162 Views
-
Last post by Digitalhorizons
Sun Jan 29, 2017 5:42 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: xash and 7 guests




