An improbable wish-discrete Graphics Ultrabay module for X3x
An improbable wish-discrete Graphics Ultrabay module for X3x
I do wish, that the x30x would have a high powered discrete graphics card option that takes the form of an ultrabay module that can be plugged into its bay, when one needs it. Wouldn't matter if this would add a pound to the weight or have its cooling mechanism sticking a mile out of the laptop, as it could be taken out whenever unecessary. Then it would be perfect. I don't understand why no one does something like that.
Re: An improbable wish-discrete Graphics Ultrabay module for X3x
Because the number of people who'd buy this is very small. To make it profitable it would be very expensive.malachont wrote:I don't understand why no one does something like that.
E7440
Re: An improbable wish-discrete Graphics Ultrabay module for X3x
Actually, competing companies have made such a product and a compatible laptop platform for a number of years. Its called the XGP port. Laptops that have it, and run on the Congo platform, can be a X301 size and weight netbook with slow integrated graphics and ultralight weight on the road, and at home it plugs into an external graphics card which turns the machine into a graphics and video monster, 7-9k's of 3DMARK06, at about $200-$250 for the module. This way one does not need a desktop anymore. The module also does crossfire with the integrated video (I think).
The $700 Ferrari netbook that's coming out soon with this XGP port is not the first machine that has this (A Fujitsu laptop released last year had it)
I also think that an $1500+ business ultraportable line that boasts synthetic CPU performance of a desktop looks very odd if it bottlenecks its real world performance with a crippled graphics capability about ten times slower than the average desktop workstation, forcing the customer to still shell out for a desktop for graphics/video chores. I'd simply not buy such a laptop at all, but spend $300 on some cheap 12" netbook and with a few hundred dollars more buy a desktop workstation. It sure would be nice if more manufacturers allowed us to get rid of one more device that duplicates cost and effort.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mobile/dis ... phics.html
http://asia.cnet.com/crave/2009/09/28/m ... hics-unit/
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7851.html
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/ ... quGVzv4GBA
The $700 Ferrari netbook that's coming out soon with this XGP port is not the first machine that has this (A Fujitsu laptop released last year had it)
I also think that an $1500+ business ultraportable line that boasts synthetic CPU performance of a desktop looks very odd if it bottlenecks its real world performance with a crippled graphics capability about ten times slower than the average desktop workstation, forcing the customer to still shell out for a desktop for graphics/video chores. I'd simply not buy such a laptop at all, but spend $300 on some cheap 12" netbook and with a few hundred dollars more buy a desktop workstation. It sure would be nice if more manufacturers allowed us to get rid of one more device that duplicates cost and effort.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mobile/dis ... phics.html
http://asia.cnet.com/crave/2009/09/28/m ... hics-unit/
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7851.html
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/ ... quGVzv4GBA
Re: An improbable wish-discrete Graphics Ultrabay module for X3x
There's another one of those external dedicated graphics card capable laptops- this one does it with a discrete docking station. Now if only if were the Geforce 250 and not the 220, and the notebook were compatible with the Lenovo power port, I'd buy it.
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5371
Why do the Thinkpads have to be always the last with such innovations? its not that they are conservative. They do innovate, but if only they would not concentrate on things such as adding a second 10" screen to a Thinkpad or tinkering with discrete instant boot OS's for netbooks when Lenovo could rid us of the desktop completely! and it will also be good for the environment.
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5371
Why do the Thinkpads have to be always the last with such innovations? its not that they are conservative. They do innovate, but if only they would not concentrate on things such as adding a second 10" screen to a Thinkpad or tinkering with discrete instant boot OS's for netbooks when Lenovo could rid us of the desktop completely! and it will also be good for the environment.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
T410: Bluetooth module with aftermarket Wi-Fi card?
by RichardG867 » Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:07 pm » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 1 Replies
- 765 Views
-
Last post by TPFanatic
Sat Mar 11, 2017 8:38 pm
-
-
-
ThinkPad X220 gaming benchmarks and graphics benchmarks
by PaulBrause » Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:34 pm » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 4 Replies
- 1164 Views
-
Last post by Digitalhorizons
Sun Jan 29, 2017 5:42 am
-
-
-
Best HDMI Graphics card to stream video to TV from M58P-MJV2740 ?
by E350 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 11:51 pm » in IBM or Lenovo Desktops/Workstations/ThinkStations only - 9 Replies
- 1115 Views
-
Last post by E350
Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:12 pm
-
-
-
Nvidia Graphics and video editing
by Whitieiii » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:59 am » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 22 Replies
- 1095 Views
-
Last post by farmall77
Thu Feb 09, 2017 1:25 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests




