ausmike wrote:Hi everyone ....
I am also in 'waite' mode for the newer X2/X3 series machines from Lenovo
I have had used a XxTablet with touch screen and felt a lot LESS IMPRESSED....
My hope and wish list from Lenovo for X Series would be :
1)decent proc's ..preferably newer intels (as the 'SU' Series has serious limitations in 'several usage/apps' running.....
2)BEST IN CLASS display .........say when compared to mac air....etc etc
3) MUST HAVE HDMI connector ..........for easy connection to HDtv/Display ...great for connection when doing (ppts)pres'tions and or Movie watching etc..
4)USB3 x 3 atleast ,,,,,as I have current W and T series with USB3 and transfer rates are super nice! (ok make it backward compatable to usb2 also)
5)add the newer BATTERY Tech...now avalible eg ones used by HP ; Apple; Sony etc on their similar systems...
6) make it LINUX adaptable/compatable ....(big ask!!)
ARE YOU LISTERNING LENOooooVO !!
In general while I used to exclusively buy Thinkpads, I think some other manufacturers offer some machines that offer better overall characteristics for some usage patterns.
I am happy with the CPUs and really care more about battery life/power efficiency more than outright processing speed. I have never really had an issue with the processing power of any X-series Thinkpad. There are basic engineering limitations when you expect a machine that weighs less than 2.5lbs. I put an SSD in mine and that takes care of any performance issues if I even had any. If you keep an ultraportable then I suppose it would make sense to keep a desktop for more computationally intensive tasks of which there are really only a few.
X-series displays have always been pathetic and they better really start thinking about putting half-way decent panels in them.
In this day and age either HDMI or DisplayPort is a must. Let there be VGA also, but a digital output is a bare minimum.
USB 3 is also something I would expect from the refresh/redesign.
Battery life IMHO is really hindered by the Windows OS. I think Windows is just pathetic in extending battery life. Anandtech did a review of Mac OS vs. Windows battery life and the only reason the 11" Air can get 6 hours of battery life is because it runs Mac OS. I haven't tested personally but I bet if I ran Windows in bootcamp the battery life would become half. People may hate me for saying but, slowly I have come to the conclusion that MS is basically incompetent. They are single handedly screwing the ultraportable market with an OS that eats battery. This is an issue with all portable computing hardware not just ultraportables and really they come across as purely apathetic when they have demonstrated that after all these releases of their OS they still don't care at all about power use. It's all a song and dance at MS. Real crap software products in general. I have respect only for Outlook and Excel. The rest are all crap (in a relative sense).
As for Linux, I welcome the option. I have read that they do some BIOS verification of some hardware parts that makes life miserable for people changing parts for better Linux compatibility. So, far from releasing Linux capable machines out of the box, they take it one step further and throw a roadblock in the way of people trying to run Linux on a Thinkpad. This sort of stance is just plain bad.
I have to agree overall. I used to buy only Thinkpads but my last 3 laptop purchases were not Thinkpads and sadly I have no real interest in seeing what's coming next. I think they screwed up the X-series by going widescreen and if they return to 4:3 that would be enough of a differentiating factor to come back to Lenovo. I used to think that I could not live without the Trackpoint but as much as I wouldn't have admitted it last year the Apple Trackpad is nearly just as useful. It's not as good as the Trackpoint, but it is just fine.
In general it seems to me that Lenovo has followed the Thinkpad formula very well, but they have utterly failed to gauge the market, and most importantly their customers. We have been asking for so many things for so long and refresh after refresh nothing got addressed. They have failed to evolve the Thinkpad into a machine for 2010 and beyond, and they seem to still want to offer machines that would be great for 2005. I am the last person to care for a jazzy machine and I like the design of Thinkpads but really putting out machines without a display port in 2010 is just arrogance. We get it, the machine is aimed at business users, but that didn't stop these guys from switching from 4:3 to 16:10 just to save money. If they really cared about business users they would have kept a 4:3 option at least in the X-series. To me it all comes down to using "business users" as a scapegoat to keep the parts as cheap as possible and to gouge customers like $200+ for a dock to get displayport, not to mention the added weight and bulk. The use of cheap crap displays using the excuse that business users don't care about things like that. Well it all sounds like a poor excuse.