(2) T60p 2.16 GHz, 4 Gb RAM, 256 Gb SSD, 500 Gb HD in Ultrabay, 14" 1400x1050, Win 7 32-bit/XP dualboot
(3) T22 900mHz, 512 Mb RAM, 320 Gb HD, Win XP
(4) 600E 400mHz, 512 Mb RAM, 12 Gb HD, Win XP
- Senior Member
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 7:45 pm
- Location: North Ridgeville, Ohio, United States
Wife's: T61p T9500·FX570m·WUXGA | X220T i7-2640M
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 2169
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:25 am
- Location: N. Bellmore, ny
No, the battery number has nothing to do with its quality or revision. It is an arbitrary number specific to a machine lineup. Due note, the + or ++ on the end of a number signifies the size.
On a T61, the 88 battery was 4 cells, the 88+ was 6 cells, and the 88++ was 9 cells.
*: The T61's battery wasn't 88, I'm just using it for an example.
The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.
- Similar Topics
- Last post
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests