Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:52 pm
The demo we've seen is a 14.1", 1440x900, LED backlit screen. I assume 1680x1050 is a mistake.
Est. 1995 - Copyright © 1995-2017 (see FAQ for details)
https://forum.thinkpads.com/
SHoTTa35 wrote:well do you want 2 30" LCDs or just one? Monitors that big need a dual-link DVI which basically uses up all the bandwdith. To get another 30" LCD you'd need the advanced dock with a PCI-E card inside supporting dual link also.
In You have space for 2, 30" LCDS though? :O
I count 11 different Nvidia cards that support 2 dual-link DVI ports.SHoTTa35 wrote:well probably not. You can use 1 30" with the T60 now but not even with a desktop can you turn 2 30" with just 1 video card. EVen though some PCI-E cards have 2 DVI ports on them you can't run 2 dual link LCDs simulataneously. Not even with the latest nVidia cards can you do that and that's a $400 card. There just enough enough bandwidth to manage 2 LCDs at those resolutions at the sametime.
As i said though, even a T60 today can run a 30" LCD with the advanced MINI dock. NO extra card needed.
When using an advanced dock with a seperate video card do you have to reboot everytime you dock and undock or can you just hibernate to dock and undock? Are the advanced docks with seperate video cards a hassle?awolfe63 wrote:I count 11 different Nvidia cards that support 2 dual-link DVI ports.SHoTTa35 wrote:well probably not. You can use 1 30" with the T60 now but not even with a desktop can you turn 2 30" with just 1 video card. EVen though some PCI-E cards have 2 DVI ports on them you can't run 2 dual link LCDs simulataneously. Not even with the latest nVidia cards can you do that and that's a $400 card. There just enough enough bandwidth to manage 2 LCDs at those resolutions at the sametime.
As i said though, even a T60 today can run a 30" LCD with the advanced MINI dock. NO extra card needed.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_11761.html
They start under $200.
yea sounds like a hassle. I will stick with my mini dock. does anyone know the size of 2 external monitors I can use. 1 dvi and 1 vga.awolfe63 wrote:When I tried it with my T42 (ATI internal graphics), I had to reboot if I used an Nvidia graphics card and not if I used an ATI card - but I'm not sure I ever got it quite figured out right. I assume the answer is OS specific as well.
What size monitor in inches works best with native 1920 x 1200 resolution? I really appreciate the help. I prefer Dell monitors if that makes any difference.awolfe63 wrote:You can use 1920x1200 on each. The VGA one needs a good cable and works better with newer (T6x) thinkpads than older ones. Probably will be fine with T400/T500.
Sadly, if it was not a mistake, I could *almost* justify going to widescreen. This is one of those confusing things going on, there was once a trend of higher and higher resolution, now it's reversing and no one seems to notice or care. It the industry is determined that "widescreen is the path to enlightenment", then at least give me the same vertical resolution so I'm not losing pixels.mrichichdrew wrote:The demo we've seen is a 14.1", 1440x900, LED backlit screen. I assume 1680x1050 is a mistake.
This is incorrect. Even my $100 used ATI x1900xtx has my 2 30in monitors running at full 2560x1600 resolution.SHoTTa35 wrote:well probably not. You can use 1 30" with the T60 now but not even with a desktop can you turn 2 30" with just 1 video card. EVen though some PCI-E cards have 2 DVI ports on them you can't run 2 dual link LCDs simulataneously. Not even with the latest nVidia cards can you do that and that's a $400 card. There just enough enough bandwidth to manage 2 LCDs at those resolutions at the sametime.
As i said though, even a T60 today can run a 30" LCD with the advanced MINI dock. NO extra card needed.
I understand how you feel, and I am no fan of the wide screen either. Technically though, it is more difficult to provide the same vertical resolution on a 14.1" wide screen than to do so on a 14.1" 4:3 screen. The wide screen format is smaller in area as well as in height, so unless the manufacturer put into a higher dpi, which is likely to cost more and usually manufacturers would like to avoid, you will see a lower vertical resolution on the wide screen.laowai wrote:Sadly, if it was not a mistake, I could *almost* justify going to widescreen. This is one of those confusing things going on, there was once a trend of higher and higher resolution, now it's reversing and no one seems to notice or care. It the industry is determined that "widescreen is the path to enlightenment", then at least give me the same vertical resolution so I'm not losing pixels.mrichichdrew wrote:The demo we've seen is a 14.1", 1440x900, LED backlit screen. I assume 1680x1050 is a mistake.