Intel HD 3000 (Sandy Bridge graphics) vs. Nvidia Optimus
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:56 pm
I have no experience with either graphics option and was hoping for some feedback on which is a better purchase for me. I've heard Optimus provides better performance but that it can cause problems (et. al especially if one wants to run a Linux Distro etc).
Assuming I will be able to get Intel HD 3000 graphics on the upcoming T420, do you think I'll have powerful enough graphics to do everything I want? Only gaming I'd do would be "old school" counter-strike. But I do want to be able to play mp4 h.264 video files off my hard drive smoothly.
I have a discrete ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 on an old T60. This video card works fine for me (except for 3D stuff). Not sure if this provides a reference point for performance comparisons or not. Would the Intel HD 3000 provide any performance gain over this ATI card?
Love to hear any feedback and info you can share. thanks.
Assuming I will be able to get Intel HD 3000 graphics on the upcoming T420, do you think I'll have powerful enough graphics to do everything I want? Only gaming I'd do would be "old school" counter-strike. But I do want to be able to play mp4 h.264 video files off my hard drive smoothly.
I have a discrete ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 on an old T60. This video card works fine for me (except for 3D stuff). Not sure if this provides a reference point for performance comparisons or not. Would the Intel HD 3000 provide any performance gain over this ATI card?
Love to hear any feedback and info you can share. thanks.