W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
-
fredsmith999
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:08 pm
- Location: london, uk
W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
I like the look of a quad core w510. Say a 720 or 820qm, 8gb ram.
How would performance compare to a typical new cheaper laptop with 4th or 5th gen i5 dual core?
I can't find newish benchmarks for it and the general cpu comparison doesn't look very promising.
How would performance compare to a typical new cheaper laptop with 4th or 5th gen i5 dual core?
I can't find newish benchmarks for it and the general cpu comparison doesn't look very promising.
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15731
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
Welcome to the forum!
W510 in QC guise still packs plenty of punch, but will run quite a bit warmer and have significantly worse battery life than newer systems.
What's the intended use for the system in the first place?
W510 in QC guise still packs plenty of punch, but will run quite a bit warmer and have significantly worse battery life than newer systems.
What's the intended use for the system in the first place?
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
fredsmith999
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:08 pm
- Location: london, uk
Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
Thanks. Nothing enormously demanding, just regular use plus some coding, VMs, little bit of simulation.
But i am looking for a laptop that will sit on my desk 99% of the next 3 years so battery unimportant.
Nice to run lots of things at once: a vm open, workspaces, etc. Also i might need more power in the future (studying maths, actuarial, econ. etc.). For a mobile device i could manage on 2 cores but here, power is nice and why not?
W510 pretty cheap but w520 rather a lot more: but seems much more powerful on the benchmarks in reviews: 2720qm w520 can't DOUBLE 720qm w510 performance can it? Surely the gap not THAT big. But average passmark score of 2720qm systems, generally, IS double. Worth the money for future proofing?
But i am looking for a laptop that will sit on my desk 99% of the next 3 years so battery unimportant.
Nice to run lots of things at once: a vm open, workspaces, etc. Also i might need more power in the future (studying maths, actuarial, econ. etc.). For a mobile device i could manage on 2 cores but here, power is nice and why not?
W510 pretty cheap but w520 rather a lot more: but seems much more powerful on the benchmarks in reviews: 2720qm w520 can't DOUBLE 720qm w510 performance can it? Surely the gap not THAT big. But average passmark score of 2720qm systems, generally, IS double. Worth the money for future proofing?
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15731
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
I'd say "yes".fredsmith999 wrote:Worth the money for future proofing?
W520 runs SATA III in the main bay where W510 is still SATA II. The former also has the option of using the WWAN slot for a mSATA boot drive.
If you're going to run VMs a cool-running system would be preferred to prevent throttling, and in that respect W520 wins hands down as well.
My $0.02 only...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
fredsmith999
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:08 pm
- Location: london, uk
Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
Thanks, saving up for the w520, unless i find a cheap t520 first. With quad and discrete graphics would that be as good? (they have cheaper nvidia cards but looks good enough)
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15731
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
Well, W520 with QC has 4 RAM slots where T520 only has two...so I'd go with a W, but that's your money to spend...or not.fredsmith999 wrote:Thanks, saving up for the w520, unless i find a cheap t520 first. With quad and discrete graphics would that be as good? (they have cheaper nvidia cards but looks good enough)
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
QWERTY Andreas
- Junior Member

- Posts: 460
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:40 am
- Location: Copenhagen Denmark
Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff
Take a look at the numbers yourself: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core ... 034.0.html
It is not that "fast" anymore (but still usable for some time to come), and it generates quite alot of heat.
It is not that "fast" anymore (but still usable for some time to come), and it generates quite alot of heat.
Thinkpad W500 (2.53 GHz P8700, 4 GB RAM, FireGL V5700, WUXGA)
Thinkpad T61F 14" (2.53 GHz QX9300, 6 GB RAM, Quadro FX570m 256 MB, SXGA). Advanced dock with AMD Radeon HD7750
Custom build ITX desktop (i5 4590, 8GB RAM, AMD R7 260X, custom watercooling)
Thinkpad 8, Fujitsu F-07C
FS: T61F
Thinkpad T61F 14" (2.53 GHz QX9300, 6 GB RAM, Quadro FX570m 256 MB, SXGA). Advanced dock with AMD Radeon HD7750
Custom build ITX desktop (i5 4590, 8GB RAM, AMD R7 260X, custom watercooling)
Thinkpad 8, Fujitsu F-07C
FS: T61F
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
did any T520 models have quad-core i7 with Intel (NOT nVIDIA) graphics?
by jthorn42 » Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:46 pm » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 8 Replies
- 1138 Views
-
Last post by jthorn42
Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:02 pm
-
-
-
Z60m - Recommended Windows version and some other stuff.
by larsoverland » Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:47 am » in ThinkPad R, A, G and Z Series - 3 Replies
- 1425 Views
-
Last post by larsoverland
Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:22 pm
-
-
-
boot 98se via USB with w510
by D L Davis » Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:23 pm » in ThinkPad W500/510/520 and W7x0 Series - 6 Replies
- 1551 Views
-
Last post by D L Davis
Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:43 pm
-
-
-
Slow to reach the BIOS spash screen - W510
by 6G7hg » Sun Jan 15, 2017 1:55 pm » in ThinkPad W500/510/520 and W7x0 Series - 8 Replies
- 1743 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:43 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests



