Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Back when Thinkpad 770 was the blingest piece of toy, I can see why the image loading warning was useful and necessary. But in 2019, doesn't everyone have an internet access with enough speed and usage allowance that few 10s megabytes of data won't dent their internet meter at all?
Just wondering if it's still strictly enforced in the forum I know when in Rome...
Just wondering if it's still strictly enforced in the forum I know when in Rome...
With the original box and documentation : 600, 380XD, 385XD, X24, X30(10th Anniv), T42p, T43, R52, W700ds
Without : 385XD, 600X, 770X, W701, T420, T430, T520, X230
Not working & for parts : At least a dozen
Other laptops : Dell, Alienware, Lenovo
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
It's like, sort of enforced, when someone feels like enforcing it.
Apparently, not everyone has high-speed internet, go figure. Some people also just don't like (many) inline images.
Most likely 1-2 small pics will go unnoticed / unenforced. If you feel like posting more / larger images - please put a warning in the title.
Anything obnoxiously large (the kind that may stretch the screen for the average viewer) will definitely get taken down, and I would take it down even if the forum never had any rules regarding images in the first place - simply because it's annoying and borderline disrespectful.
Apparently, not everyone has high-speed internet, go figure. Some people also just don't like (many) inline images.
Most likely 1-2 small pics will go unnoticed / unenforced. If you feel like posting more / larger images - please put a warning in the title.
Anything obnoxiously large (the kind that may stretch the screen for the average viewer) will definitely get taken down, and I would take it down even if the forum never had any rules regarding images in the first place - simply because it's annoying and borderline disrespectful.
Thinkpad 25 (20K7), T490 (20N3), Yoga 14 (20FY), T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X220 4291-4BG
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:25 am
- Location: N. Bellmore, ny
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
I tend to read this on my phone and a long post with a nice fat image at the bottom, most of the time I'll stop reading regardless if I'm interested or not because it's just a pain to scroll.dr_st wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:35 pmIt's like, sort of enforced, when someone feels like enforcing it.
Apparently, not everyone has high-speed internet, go figure. Some people also just don't like (many) inline images.
Most likely 1-2 small pics will go unnoticed / unenforced. If you feel like posting more / larger images - please put a warning in the title.
Anything obnoxiously large (the kind that may stretch the screen for the average viewer) will definitely get taken down, and I would take it down even if the forum never had any rules regarding images in the first place - simply because it's annoying and borderline disrespectful.
Thinkpad4by3's Law of the Universe.
The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.
The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Yes, I have been a rather vocal supporter of this rule.Jefferson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:30 pmBack when Thinkpad 770 was the blingest piece of toy, I can see why the image loading warning was useful and necessary. But in 2019, doesn't everyone have an internet access with enough speed and usage allowance that few 10s megabytes of data won't dent their internet meter at all?
Just wondering if it's still strictly enforced in the forum I know when in Rome...
My apartment's connection is technically unlimited fibre-optic, but it is shared amongst the whole building and this means my connection can be insufferably slow some days (to the extent that I will take a hike to my University campus instead to do anything on the internet).
My phone (where I often view this forum from), is also a small 5 (used to be 3 until quite recently, but I'm finally starting to move up in life) gb per month data plan. Exceeding this means the worst data overage slowdown speed anyone has ever seen, often leading to a website loading timeout.
Please use imgur. It's a great workaround and it means that I won't have to use all my data just looking through this forum.
Last edited by madicetea on Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
MadIceTea, Thinkpad Enthusiast
Daily: X250 FHD
Museum: PC110 20MB, X61 T9300 SXGA+ LED
Donated: x2001 AFFS i5-530 (to my alma matter)
Past: 701Cs German, 535/X, 760E/XL, i-series 12/14xx, piano s30, R60e, X60, X61, T60, T61, X200 P8700, X121e
That chicken sure looks funny.
Daily: X250 FHD
Museum: PC110 20MB, X61 T9300 SXGA+ LED
Donated: x2001 AFFS i5-530 (to my alma matter)
Past: 701Cs German, 535/X, 760E/XL, i-series 12/14xx, piano s30, R60e, X60, X61, T60, T61, X200 P8700, X121e
That chicken sure looks funny.
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Not necessarily, because some internet service providers set data limits for 'cost' related reasons. Plus, even a few megabytes of data would still be quite massive for those that are on a single-digit gigabyte plan.
I believe that it is still enforced, since this topic's original poster had thrown up quite a rant when he was forced to link the images that he had posted.
In my opinion, I think it would be better to link the images instead. It would remove the need for us to scroll (especially on some phones), or complain about the images being too big. Or, as demonstrated in that particular topic, start an argument that would be 3-5 posts long.
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
I'm so tempted now...
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
We do have a photo posting forum...
I would still maintain a respectable size even in there though. No one needs to see a photo at 3000x4000 pixels.
I would still maintain a respectable size even in there though. No one needs to see a photo at 3000x4000 pixels.
A31p P-IV 2Ghz, 2MB, 2653-R6U
T500 T9600 2055-BE9
T510 i5 4384-DV7
T510 i7 4349-A64
T520 i7QM 4242-4UU Highly Modified
T16 i7 1260P 21BV000SUS
T500 T9600 2055-BE9
T510 i5 4384-DV7
T510 i7 4349-A64
T520 i7QM 4242-4UU Highly Modified
T16 i7 1260P 21BV000SUS
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Welcome to the forum!
You're new here but this subject matter has been discussed ad nauseam for years now. This forum still attracts ThinkPad enthusiasts from all over the globe, and as long as we have members stuck with no real broadband in no man's land - something that is far more common in the U.S. than most people would believe - the current rules are likely to stay in place.FrankTodd wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:56 amI don’t understand how difficult it is to insert into any editor that doesn’t cut quality, to make a photo convenient for quality. Or embed this feature in the forum. There are a large number of different quality services for this, I am sure that it is not difficult to integrate into the forum.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Ever heard the expression a picture is worth a thousand words?
The rule is paradoxical. This is the only computer forum I am aware of that has a rule like this in place. Pictures and image posting are natural, especially when talking about new builds, screen grabs, etc. Computers are a multi media platform. The idea that you cannot capitalize on this in 2019 is baffling and a little ironic. If anything, image posting should be encouraged by forum staff to round out the multi media experience. One reason I don't contribute to the forum very often is due to this rule being enforced. If I cant really show my work off here, then what's the point of even having a forum in the first place?
I've heard of the whole cell phone issue, but I say too bad. If you don't have an LTE connection in 2019 you shouldn't be browsing the web in the first place. And its a fallacy to believe only the US has "broadband" capabilities. Many countries in fact out pace the United States in overall internet bandwidth speeds. Same goes without saying for cell phones, the United States is again out of first place by a notable margin.
This image shows the relative 4G coverage around the globe, and the scale is 1-100% for reference.
Edited picture to conform to the 50Kb cap. Its now wasted because nobody can make out the data because its super tiny. Again this is 4G coverage around the globe:
One way to get a pulse on what members think is to conduct a poll. I think you'd be surprised how many people are disgusted with and despise this rule.
The rule is paradoxical. This is the only computer forum I am aware of that has a rule like this in place. Pictures and image posting are natural, especially when talking about new builds, screen grabs, etc. Computers are a multi media platform. The idea that you cannot capitalize on this in 2019 is baffling and a little ironic. If anything, image posting should be encouraged by forum staff to round out the multi media experience. One reason I don't contribute to the forum very often is due to this rule being enforced. If I cant really show my work off here, then what's the point of even having a forum in the first place?
I've heard of the whole cell phone issue, but I say too bad. If you don't have an LTE connection in 2019 you shouldn't be browsing the web in the first place. And its a fallacy to believe only the US has "broadband" capabilities. Many countries in fact out pace the United States in overall internet bandwidth speeds. Same goes without saying for cell phones, the United States is again out of first place by a notable margin.
This image shows the relative 4G coverage around the globe, and the scale is 1-100% for reference.
Edited picture to conform to the 50Kb cap. Its now wasted because nobody can make out the data because its super tiny. Again this is 4G coverage around the globe:
One way to get a pulse on what members think is to conduct a poll. I think you'd be surprised how many people are disgusted with and despise this rule.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Which is why one posts a link...and not an actual picture...with so many hosting sites available it doesn't take an awful lot of time to do AND you can use those uploaded images on several different sites. Been there, done that.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:15 am
Edited picture to conform to the 50Kb cap. Its now wasted because nobody can make out the data because its super tiny. Again this is 4G coverage around the globe:
Those who are disgusted with the rule and despise it are free not to participate in this forum. Since I hate repeating myself ad nauseam...One way to get a pulse on what members think is to conduct a poll. I think you'd be surprised how many people are disgusted with and despise this rule.
ajkula66 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:03 pm
This forum still attracts ThinkPad enthusiasts from all over the globe, and as long as we have members stuck with no real broadband in no man's land - something that is far more common in the U.S. than most people would believe - the current rules are likely to stay in place.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Don't mind me, I'm just venting about this picture thing. Trying to wrap my head around this.
Lets see: A multi-media device (computer) forum wherein multi media is essentially outlawed. So bizarre.
The forum should be a medium for information transfer and knowledge gain. I'd encourage you to come up to date from the dark ages and I for one think if the cap was removed nobody would complain, except for the usual 2-3 cell phone people who always post in these threads about how difficult it is browsing this forum with their 1G data plan from 1996. Because that is the reason right? I mean, the main reason we can't post large pictures is because some people are still dialing up to the internet to browse this particular forum? Other than the usual suspects, in all honesty, how many people still browse this forum on a less than adequate connection? I bet the number is close to ZERO.
Lets see: A multi-media device (computer) forum wherein multi media is essentially outlawed. So bizarre.
The forum should be a medium for information transfer and knowledge gain. I'd encourage you to come up to date from the dark ages and I for one think if the cap was removed nobody would complain, except for the usual 2-3 cell phone people who always post in these threads about how difficult it is browsing this forum with their 1G data plan from 1996. Because that is the reason right? I mean, the main reason we can't post large pictures is because some people are still dialing up to the internet to browse this particular forum? Other than the usual suspects, in all honesty, how many people still browse this forum on a less than adequate connection? I bet the number is close to ZERO.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
-
- **SENIOR** Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 2:26 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Because it eats up hosting resources maybe? Or slows the forum software? That’s why I request that members post links and host resources outside of the forum that I own and operate.storm-chaser wrote:Don't mind me, I'm just venting about this picture thing. Trying to wrap my head around this.
Lets see: A multi-media device (computer) forum wherein multi media is essentially outlawed. So bizarre.
The forum should be a medium for information transfer and knowledge gain. I'd encourage you to come up to date from the dark ages and I for one think if the cap was removed nobody would complain, except for the usual 2-3 cell phone people who always post in these threads about how difficult it is browsing this forum with their 1G data plan from 1996. Because that is the reason right? I mean, the main reason we can't post large pictures is because some people are still dialing up to the internet to browse this particular forum? Other than the usual suspects, in all honesty, how many people still browse this forum on a less than adequate connection? I bet the number is close to ZERO.
John P. O'Banion, JD, PE, BSEE
Registered Patent Attorney
http://www.intellectual.com
X220 (McDonnell bios), X230 (1vyrain bios), T530 (1vyrain bios), X1 Carbon 5th Signature Edition
Registered Patent Attorney
http://www.intellectual.com
X220 (McDonnell bios), X230 (1vyrain bios), T530 (1vyrain bios), X1 Carbon 5th Signature Edition
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
And I bet that you would be very surprised with the answer...there are large chunks of this country where Internet is at A.D. 2003 speeds...at best.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:11 pmOther than the usual suspects, in all honesty, how many people still browse this forum on a less than adequate connection? I bet the number is close to ZERO.
Not everyone has FiOS or U-verse available in their neighbourhood. Or even a decent cellular connection. I know it's hard to believe at this day and age but that's the way things are. We can debate why U.S. lags behind the rest of the civilized world in this respect, but that won't change the current state of affairs.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 am
- Location: Metro Manila, Philippines
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Good thing my image hosting service (flickr) automatically generates preview pics of different sizes. I put the 240x180 preview in an img tag, which in turn is put inside a url tag, so clicking the preview pic leads to the full-size image.
Planned Purchase: T480s i5-8350 FHD Touch
Impulse Buy: Thinkpad not named for safety reasons
RIP: X220 4291-C91 X61 7676-A24 760XD-U9E
Impulse Buy: Thinkpad not named for safety reasons
RIP: X220 4291-C91 X61 7676-A24 760XD-U9E
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
I must admit that I do not understand your rant.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:15 amThe rule is paradoxical. This is the only computer forum I am aware of that has a rule like this in place. Pictures and image posting are natural, especially when talking about new builds, screen grabs, etc. Computers are a multi media platform. The idea that you cannot capitalize on this in 2019 is baffling and a little ironic. If anything, image posting should be encouraged by forum staff to round out the multi media experience. One reason I don't contribute to the forum very often is due to this rule being enforced. If I cant really show my work off here, then what's the point of even having a forum in the first place?
Maybe you are not aware of the fact that there is a forum called Pictures of your ThinkPad & desk setup, and that this is exactly the place to show off your new build, screen grabs, whatever. It specifically says, in the forum description: "LARGE picture files allowed here". I've personally posted more than a dozen threads of my Thinkpads (and not only), full of pictures, in that forum, and haven't received a single complaint.
The only exception I see is what I already mentioned earlier is this thread:
If you want to have a thread that's mostly pics - please put it in the pics forum, no issue.dr_st wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:35 pmAnything obnoxiously large (the kind that may stretch the screen for the average viewer) will definitely get taken down, and I would take it down even if the forum never had any rules regarding images in the first place - simply because it's annoying and borderline disrespectful
If you just want to have some pics that are related to the topic of discussion / help demonstrate something, but the thread is not otherwise centered on them, feel free to post them in any forum, as long as they are reasonably small / there are not too many of them. Given the fact that most image hosting services offer automatic thumbnail generation or automatically provide embedded images of different sizes, there is little reason not to take a little extra step and format the images/links in a way that will be easy on the viewers.
If one just wants to be lazy, and simply embed 30 images taken by their 10-megapixel (>4K resolution) camera without any editing, well, then, I, for one, don't want this kind of crap in the forum, and if we need a silly archaic rule to "hide behind" to avoid this kind of crap, then so be it.
P.S. Speaking only for myself; the other forum members / administrators may have different opinions.
Thinkpad 25 (20K7), T490 (20N3), Yoga 14 (20FY), T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X220 4291-4BG
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
The rule is probably more useful for people in rural US who still have very poor internet as there is little money to be made, both in the US and Europe rural areas are poorly served by high speed internet or mobile.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:15 amI've heard of the whole cell phone issue, but I say too bad. If you don't have an LTE connection in 2019 you shouldn't be browsing the web in the first place. And its a fallacy to believe only the US has "broadband" capabilities. Many countries in fact out pace the United States in overall internet bandwidth speeds. Same goes without saying for cell phones, the United States is again out of first place by a notable margin.
Home - Win 10 MSi GF63 Gaming Laptop /Arch GNOME 3/X230 Tablet /X61 [Korean] - Debian 10/T60p - Ubuntu 20.10 Helix 2
Work - Win10/Thinkpad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Work - Win10/Thinkpad X1 Tablet Gen 2
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Please forgive me for dragging you guys through this again and I understand its been rehashed many times before, but I have yet a few points Id like to raise with the community. And this is probably a fruitless endeavor on my behalf because it could be the year 2030 and I have a sneaking suspicion that the rule will never be lifted. First, the idea of a tiny 50Kb cap on image size is hilarious. Just popping up google takes more than that.
In all sincerity I think you should put your ear to the ground and hear the people. Especially new members are very much turned off when their initial post about a recent build becomes yet another debate about posting pictures and invariably the admin take the pics down and issue yet another warning (ad nauseum). Wouldn't it be nice if you didn't have to muddy the waters? Listening to your members is an important step towards resolution here. As I said, this is the only forum I've encountered with this bizarre rule.
This is a quote from section 5 of the rules of the road:
As moderators you guys hold the keys to the kingdom so at the end of the day you have the final say, and I have to respect that regardless of the outcome here.
In all sincerity I think you should put your ear to the ground and hear the people. Especially new members are very much turned off when their initial post about a recent build becomes yet another debate about posting pictures and invariably the admin take the pics down and issue yet another warning (ad nauseum). Wouldn't it be nice if you didn't have to muddy the waters? Listening to your members is an important step towards resolution here. As I said, this is the only forum I've encountered with this bizarre rule.
This is a quote from section 5 of the rules of the road:
So, can this claim even be substantiated? I mean what if the number is ZERO? Would you then change the rule? Or come up with another reason to eliminate large images? Again, a poll might be in order because I probably count the luddites here on one hand. This rule has been in place since 2005. Does the forum management not realize that internet speeds have improved exponentially since then?Reason: many people look at the forum using cellphones, which may have Download Restrictions.
As moderators you guys hold the keys to the kingdom so at the end of the day you have the final say, and I have to respect that regardless of the outcome here.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
My point was in explaining the irony of the situation we have here. Exactly what part are you not getting and perhaps I can break it down further for you?I must admit that I do not understand your rant.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
I participate in several forums that have the same or similar rules. None of them is ThinkPad-related, though.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 11:13 am
In all sincerity I think you should put your ear to the ground and hear the people. Especially new members are very much turned off when their initial post about a recent build becomes yet another debate about posting pictures and invariably the admin take the pics down and issue yet another warning (ad nauseum). Wouldn't it be nice if you didn't have to muddy the waters? Listening to your members is an important step towards resolution here. As I said, this is the only forum I've encountered with this bizarre rule.
While Internet speeds have improved in many places, there are numerous rural areas where the service outright sucks. Whether you choose to believe so or not is up to you. I would suggest that you familiarize yourself with both the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the tariffs (in the telecom sense of the word) associated with it. My belief is that this course of action would help your understanding of the subject matter which is quite lacking IMO. BTW, I've been drawing my paycheck from this very industry for the past 20 years and am prevented from saying certain things by that fact alone. There is nothing, however, that legally prevents me from pointing you or anyone else to sources that are available for one to do their own research.
So, can this claim even be substantiated? I mean what if the number is ZERO? Would you then change the rule? Or come up with another reason to eliminate large images? Again, a poll might be in order because I probably count the luddites here on one hand. This rule has been in place since 2005. Does the forum management not realize that internet speeds have improved exponentially since then?
The bottom line is: this forum - along with its German-language cousin - is the single largest well of ThinkPad-related knowledge on this planet. It's free to sign up for and use. That's as good as it gets, regardless of one's opinion on the forum rules themselves.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Okay so that being said, what's the point? You make it difficult for 99% of the forum population for the unsubstantiated one percent who may have slow internet?!
Apparently, the forum management doesn't listen to their membership base. Sad and unfortunate situation we find ourselves in. I will take my business elsewhere until the ban is lifted. The forum is a medium of expression yet pictures must be under 50kb? Yeah, something is seriously wrong with that logic.
Apparently, the forum management doesn't listen to their membership base. Sad and unfortunate situation we find ourselves in. I will take my business elsewhere until the ban is lifted. The forum is a medium of expression yet pictures must be under 50kb? Yeah, something is seriously wrong with that logic.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
You have absolutely no data to back up your 99% vs. 1% statement.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:18 pmOkay so that being said, what's the point? You make it difficult for 99% of the forum population for the unsubstantiated one percent who may have slow internet?!
You have no "business" to take elsewhere. It's not like this forum has been making any money from your posts.Apparently, the forum management doesn't listen to their membership base. Sad and unfortunate situation we find ourselves in. I will take my business elsewhere until the ban is lifted. The forum is a medium of expression yet pictures must be under 50kb? Yeah, something is seriously wrong with that logic.
To quote the immortal Lord Byron:
"FARE thee well! and if for ever,
Still for ever, fare thee well:"
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- **SENIOR** Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 2:26 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Here’s a recap of the rule:
“5. PICTURES. IF needed, you may add one or more photographs to your post. In that case you must also place a warning in the Subject: line!
PLEASE note that you may have multiple thumbnails (ideally linking to full-sized images) as long as their sum does NOT exceed the 50KB limit.”
Whether the 50k is antiquated with current technology or not, the request to link off-site just makes good sense:
“(ideally linking to full-sized images)”
Post a thumbnail and link off-site. Even a caveman can do it.
“5. PICTURES. IF needed, you may add one or more photographs to your post. In that case you must also place a warning in the Subject: line!
PLEASE note that you may have multiple thumbnails (ideally linking to full-sized images) as long as their sum does NOT exceed the 50KB limit.”
Whether the 50k is antiquated with current technology or not, the request to link off-site just makes good sense:
“(ideally linking to full-sized images)”
Post a thumbnail and link off-site. Even a caveman can do it.
John P. O'Banion, JD, PE, BSEE
Registered Patent Attorney
http://www.intellectual.com
X220 (McDonnell bios), X230 (1vyrain bios), T530 (1vyrain bios), X1 Carbon 5th Signature Edition
Registered Patent Attorney
http://www.intellectual.com
X220 (McDonnell bios), X230 (1vyrain bios), T530 (1vyrain bios), X1 Carbon 5th Signature Edition
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
That's why you might want to take a poll and find out what your membership base is all about, because clearly you do not have a clue either and I would estimate the real number is closer to ZERO percent.You have absolutely no data to back up your 99% vs. 1% statement.
The rule hasn't been updated in 14 YEARS? You do realize it was created back when dial up was prevalent? Or is this rule simply going to exist for infinity? Because the forum administration has been totally non responsive up to this point for calls to change the rule.
Hell, why not just shut the forum down completely. There are plenty of people out there who have no internet connection. By your logic these people should hold all the power and therefore if they cant get to the forum why should anyone else?
Sorry for rehashing this over and over (its just the most infuriating thing ever)
this will likely be my last post for a while - Mods thank you for putting up with me
p.s compromise is key.. perhaps lift the 50kb ceiling in favor of something like a 250kb limit?
I mean you could throw us a bone every once in a while, it wouldn't actually hurt to do that...
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
That's why you may want to start your own ThinkPad forum and see how many users run to join it.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 10:51 pm
That's why you might want to take a poll and find out what your membership base is all about, because clearly you do not have a clue either and I would estimate the real number is closer to ZERO percent.
If the subject of this discussion qualifies as the most infuriating thing ever, you must have lived an extremely sheltered life.Sorry for rehashing this over and over (its just the most infuriating thing ever)
I thought you were leaving...I mean you could throw us a bone every once in a while, it wouldn't actually hurt to do that...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Oh, I think I understand it better now, thanks. The fact that you've completely ignored everything I (and others) said about the Pictures forum (which exists for the sole purpose of people being able to post pics of anything they like without any archaic limitations) shows me that you are not trying to solve any practical problem, because there is none. You are just ranting for the sake of ranting, because apparently you are bothered by the simple fact that there exists one forum on the internet that has one rule that you do not agree with and do not find justified.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 11:19 amMy point was in explaining the irony of the situation we have here. Exactly what part are you not getting and perhaps I can break it down further for you?
Well, good luck. Feel free to take your business elsewhere, whatever that business may be.
Just one comment:
This is a strawman argument. I am not familiar with any cases where admins issued warnings for posting pics outside of limits, especially for new members. Not to say that it hasn't happened, but if it did - I call it poor judgment of the mod/admin. It is definitely not the norm and has never been the norm.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 11:13 amEspecially new members are very much turned off when their initial post about a recent build becomes yet another debate about posting pictures and invariably the admin take the pics down and issue yet another warning (ad nauseum)
Thinkpad 25 (20K7), T490 (20N3), Yoga 14 (20FY), T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X220 4291-4BG
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 23812
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:17 am
- Location: Loch Garman, Éire
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Over 10% of your posts have been complaints.
If you don't like it here, why bother?
I'd say: good riddance!
If you don't like it here, why bother?
I'd say: good riddance!
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Oh God. Let me see if we can break this down one more time. The problem is that I use pictures and / or screen grabs in most of my replies and in most threads, so yes while there is a sub forum dedicated to large pictures it doesn't help when replying to any of the other sub forums. That's the practical problem I see. My intent is not to troll, I just think an "archaic" rule originally intended for people with dial up should have justification if implemented in the year 2019. So far, you guys have basically come up with ZERO reasons why the rule should continue to be enforced. And some folks are beginning to sound more and more like luddites with every reply.The fact that you've completely ignored everything I (and others) said about the Pictures forum (which exists for the sole purpose of people being able to post pics of anything they like without any archaic limitations) shows me that you are not trying to solve any practical problem, because there is none.
Yes I have lived a relatively sheltered life but every person has the right to stand up for what they believe in, and in this situation I'm just trying to make a case for those who oppose this particular rule. Giving a voice to the masses, so to speak. My expectations are low but I had to make a go of it, nevertheless.If the subject of this discussion qualifies as the most infuriating thing ever, you must have lived an extremely sheltered life.
I've seen it happen more than once. It happened to me for example - when I posted my original T61p build. The thread turned from sharing my recent build with my fellow compatriots to a debate about pictures and how I should take them down ASAP. Not the direction I was hoping it would go in! Muddying the waters.This is a strawman argument. I am not familiar with any cases where admins issued warnings for posting pics outside of limits, especially for new members. Not to say that it hasn't happened, but if it did - I call it poor judgment of the mod/admin. It is definitely not the norm and has never been the norm.
Maybe I'm foolish, maybe I'm blind. I'm only human after all. I came here to share and grow and exchange information. After that was cut short due to multiple admin warnings about my pictures yes I have grown a little cynical. It just seems we might have some luddites in our midst. These people oppose technology yet run a forum dedicated to technology? If that's not paradoxical I don't know what is.Over 10% of your posts have been complaints.
If you don't like it here, why bother?
I'd say: good riddance!
This is still the best ThinkPad forum on the web, hands down. I could never complete with what you guys have created here. The forum is excellent in nearly all respects. Except one.That's why you may want to start your own ThinkPad forum and see how many users run to join it.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Sounds like it's just not the right platform for you. In most forums I'm posting on, pictures are used sparingly. Forums are still mostly for reading and less for slide-shows. Perhaps you should go to Discord or a more modern platform instead.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:31 amThe problem is that I use pictures and / or screen grabs in most of my replies
It's not enforced. There are small pics (the key point here is - small, not obnoxious, not obtrusive) everywhere, and very rarely someone complains about them being >50K. Especially if there is a "PIC" warning in the thread title.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:31 amSo far, you guys have basically come up with ZERO reasons why the rule should continue to be enforced.
Did you actually get a warning for this? Because, being a mod, I can view your user record, and I see no warnings there at all. Do you mean that someone broke the tags on the 10 3000-something by 2000-something pictures that you posted, which break the page layout for every user? I don't think there is a single user who likes to see that, never mind the size or the bandwidth. Maybe you are used to forum software that automatically resizes images for you, well, this one doesn't, and it is basic netiquette to make sure that what you post is actually readable by others. Something which you didn't bother to do.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:31 amI've seen it happen more than once. It happened to me for example - when I posted my original T61p build. The thread turned from sharing my recent build with my fellow compatriots to a debate about pictures and how I should take them down ASAP. Not the direction I was hoping it would go in! Muddying the waters.
We do. But it's not just the luddites that have a problem with huge stretchy pics, and it's time you understand that.storm-chaser wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:31 amIt just seems we might have some luddites in our midst.
Thinkpad 25 (20K7), T490 (20N3), Yoga 14 (20FY), T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X220 4291-4BG
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
-
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:46 pm
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
Yeah it was apparently not a warning on my record, just a reply from a mod on my thread. Mod broke the tags and then inserted a small paragraph in red explaining why this behavior was not acceptable. I obviously had missed the protocol for posting images but it was still a turn off for me as a new member.Did you actually get a warning for this? Because, being a mod, I can view your user record, and I see no warnings there at all. Do you mean that someone broke the tags on the 10 3000-something by 2000-something pictures that you posted, which break the page layout for every user? I don't think there is a single user who likes to see that, never mind the size or the bandwidth. Maybe you are used to forum software that automatically resizes images for you, well, this one doesn't, and it is basic netiquette to make sure that what you post is actually readable by others. Something which you didn't bother to do.
And I get the idea that large pictures can be obnoxious but on the flip side a tiny 50KB picture could also be considered that way, and to small or to difficult to read. If I had to chose one or the other I would definitely go for the larger image that's readable, clear and concise and could be saved for later high resolution viewing.
Forums are a medium for information exchange on multiple layers and levels. This "information" exchange can take place in various forms such reading/writing, viewing embedded videos and posting images. In my opinion putting a restriction on any one of these layers could be considered a hindrance to the information exchange as a whole. One would think forum management would want to accelerate and amplify ALL these layers in an effort to maximize the forums full potential.Forums are still mostly for reading and less for slide-shows
It was enforced by admin on me just yesterday after I posted a small CPUz screenshot - the image was definitely not obtrusive but was taken down regardless.It's not enforced. There are small pics (the key point here is - small, not obnoxious, not obtrusive) everywhere, and very rarely someone complains about them being >50K. Especially if there is a "PIC" warning in the thread title.
Indeed, some general members do have a problem with huge stretchy pics, but then again there is likely a contingent of members who would prefer the larger images. For example, when you do a google image search do you go after the large or small pictures? I almost exclusively go straight for the larger.We do. But it's not just the luddites that have a problem with huge stretchy pics, and it's time you understand that.
Computer monitors have evolved greatly in the past couple years and now support insane, amazingly high resolutions. So for most, I don't think viewing the larger image is going to be a problem in terms of thread readablility.
AMD Phenom II 965 @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
AMD Phenom II 960T @ 4.1Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600, SSD
Lenovo T61p 15.4" - Core 2 extreme X9000 CPU @ 3.4Ghz, SSD
Toshiba Satellite A505D - 2.5Ghz, 4GB RAM, 80GB SSD
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 23812
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:17 am
- Location: Loch Garman, Éire
Re: Is image-loading warning still enforced in the forum in 2019?
That "small" screenshot was 124.11 KB, well over the 50KB limit!It was enforced by admin on me just yesterday after I posted a small CPUz screenshot - the image was definitely not obtrusive but was taken down regardless.
Keep ignoring, start looking for another Forum...
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
T23 no image
by Tom81 » Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:52 pm » in ThinkPad T20-T23 & T30 Series. NOT for T25-Retro - 1 Replies
- 1307 Views
-
Last post by Tom81
Thu Jan 04, 2024 6:52 pm
-
-
-
T570 + Dock no Image on the 2nd Display?!
by Boy2006 » Sat Feb 24, 2024 2:37 am » in ThinkPad T430-T490 / T530-T590 Series - 5 Replies
- 337 Views
-
Last post by dr_st
Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:32 pm
-
-
-
XY Tech and CNMod Still Active?
by filipinogamer21 » Tue Oct 10, 2023 2:09 pm » in 51nb and other modded Thinkpads - 6 Replies
- 4543 Views
-
Last post by Frost
Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:55 pm
-
-
-
X230 trackpoint, mouse buttons and some keys still not working after keyboard change
by frog4 » Mon Jan 22, 2024 4:24 pm » in ThinkPad X230-X280 / X390 Series - 2 Replies
- 1251 Views
-
Last post by frog4
Tue Jan 23, 2024 5:22 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests