#7
Post
by dsvochak » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:14 pm
"$100 to repair a tape deck?
I would just buy the part and try to fix it myself... "
The problem was in order to replace the belt you had to remove the head mechanism. In order to get it to work when you put it back together, you needed the equipment to make sure the heads were aligned. The $100 was basically for use of the equipment. I offered $50 but they wouldn't take it. Which is interesting because instead of $50 gross income they got $0. Multiply that by a lot of customers and you're out of business.
There was an interesting editorial in today's Detroit Free Press titled "Tech Trash" which appears to not yet be available on line. If anyone wants, I'll edit this post and provide a link when it's available.
In any case, the relevant quotes are as follows, with my editorial comments in brackets
"Michigan officials estimate only 5% of e-waste is approriately recycled. The state is, however, on the right track, tightening up its computer-disposal practices and paying Dell a $21 "recovery fee" for the eventual proper disposal of each of the 7,500 new PC's going into the Department of Human Services." [which doesn't explain why the state apparently bought from Dell rather than IBM, but is nice that Dell appears to be assuming some sort of recycling obligation]
"High tech industries do not build their products with recycling in mind. They might, though, if they knew most of those products were eventually going to be returned." [and especially if high tech industries knew they were going to have to pay the environmental clean up costs if they didn't "appropriately recycle"]
As far as rechargable batteries, I use them all the time and have for years. The only problem becomes what you do with it when it will no longer recharge.
Even though East Lansing is relatively enlightened in this regard, you have to hunt for someone to take it. If you want people to recycle, it has to be something that's easy to do. If it's hard to do (either in time or money) it won't happen.
In a way, eBay and other on-line auction sites and used equipment sellers are providing a significant amount of "recycling" which has probably reduced e-waste by some significant amount. All I really mean by this is the on-line sites make it easier to recycle equipment than putting an ad in your local paper.
I'm writing this on a T23. It will only be replaced in two circumstances: 1) Doesn't work anymore and can't be fixed; 2) Doesn't run some software that I need (not some software that I want, software I need--there's a big difference).
Whether the reason to replace this machine is 1 or 2 above, the first places I would look are eBay, IBM Used equipment and the "For Sale/Wanted" forum here. In either case, I'm likely to pay less than if I buy new and I save a machine from becoming e-waste.
I've only got a disposal problem if the reason is 1 above. And only to the extent that I can't strip the broken machine and use the parts in the T21 and the other T23's we've got. Which significantly reduces my concerns.
On the other hand, it doesn't do much to keep the people making the new machines working.
I used to be an anarchist but I quit because there were too many rules