The world's biggest laptop??

Talk about "WhatEVER !"..
Message
Author
GuoXing
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 11:32 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:

#31 Post by GuoXing » Wed May 31, 2006 10:20 pm

EDIT:http://inventors.about.com/gi/dynamic/o ... 030896.htm

I love this laptop. ^^I want this.
Last edited by GuoXing on Wed May 31, 2006 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tan Guo Xing
Transnote/R52/ Z60t/ T60/

Account disabled on user\'s request

NS
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Singapore.. a tropical country..

#32 Post by NS » Wed May 31, 2006 10:24 pm

This is even better. Looks like a counter? http://inventors.about.com/gi/dynamic/o ... comp/hx20/
Last edited by NS on Wed May 31, 2006 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tfflivemb2
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 5532
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

#33 Post by tfflivemb2 » Wed May 31, 2006 10:34 pm

Yes, this topic has gone way off-topic, even for the off-topic conference.

As a side note: NS and GuoXing please take your bickering off line. This forum is not meant for you two to constantly nitpick each other to death.

NS
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Singapore.. a tropical country..

#34 Post by NS » Wed May 31, 2006 10:40 pm

No, i did not attack him. He also don't attack me. He loves to take the opportunity to remind me to read the rules especially when i confessed to him that i forgot to read it the other day.

GuoXing, thanks for the reminder. Thanks mate...

~:::Cheers:::~

archer6
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2674
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:51 pm
Location: California, USA

#35 Post by archer6 » Wed May 31, 2006 11:35 pm

I have truly enjoyed reading this thread. Brings up lots of memories of all the "latest & greatest" of the past.

Reminds me how hillarious I find it when I read this ongoing argument of 14.1 vs. 15" T60 models. Seems like a general consensus is that the 14.1 is sooooo much easier to carry that the massively heavier T60... :shock:

Just for kicks, I ordered the "optional travel bezel" for my 15" T60. Then I weighed both my 14.1" & 15" both of which are the same configuration.

Surprise....surprise... now the 15" T60 is only 4oz. heavier than the 14.1" T60!..... :D

Oh, and by the way, I was already carrying the T60 daily, as I really like the 15" IPS display.
Favorites From My ThinkPad Collection

Workstations... T40p ~ T41p ~ T42p ~ T43p ~ T60p ~ T61p ~ W500 ~ W510
T Series..... T22 ~ 30 ~ 40 ~ 41 ~ 42 ~ 43 ~ 60 ~ 400 ~ 500 ~ 510
X Series..... X20 ~ 30 ~ 40 ~ 60 ~ 60s ~ 200 ~ 200s ~ 301
Netbooks... S-10 ~ S-12

lophiomys
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:50 am
Location: Austria, EU

Tadpole V2 BullFrog I

#36 Post by lophiomys » Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:39 am

Bullfrog - a real whopper -
UltraSparc with Solaris 8)
seems to be all Made in USA.

http://www.tadpole.com/images/US/produc ... _large.jpg
http://www.tadpole.com/products/noteboo ... frogv2.asp

Dual Ultra Sparc
http://www.tadpole.com/images/US/produc ... _large.jpg

(Strangely enough their web site is an .asp, not a .jsp as you would expect)
Lophiomys
Thinkpads with 15inch 4:3 UXGA 133DPI IPS/Flexview: 2x T43p SATA Mod., 3x T42p (dying by Flexing), 2x T60p (1xATI, 1xIntel/new BoeHydis);
R51 SXGA+; X31; X41T; X41 Sata Mod; all Made in China; 570E, 701C; MBP15c3UB non-glossy mid09 / formerly 600X, 760E

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#37 Post by christopher_wolf » Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:32 pm

Sun actually has some new laptops out, costing upwards of $4K for the base model; I don't know who builds the laptops for Sun though.

http://store.sun.com/CMTemplate/CEServl ... tid=132680

:)

Seem a bit skimpy on the workstation details, only 2GB of memory, UltraSPARC IIi unless you pay significantly more for an UltraSPARC IIIi; 80GB IDE HDDs, etc
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

beeblebrox
**SENIOR** Member
**SENIOR** Member
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: No location is OK - BillM

#38 Post by beeblebrox » Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:36 am

tfflivemb2 wrote:
NS wrote:I did a google on this topic and i am going to buy a Kensington lock to try on it later and will report back the results. USe simple materials to unlock the lock. Fantastic and wonderful.

IMPORTANT: If you intend to leave your laptop for more than 1 minute, please bring it along with you or else it will be gone... Better be safe rather than sorry.
Please do not post how you were able to unlock it, aside from using a key.

Nonsense, Kensington is faced with a class action law suit, because its products are faulty by design. And when simple video clips on the internet emerged and showed that this Kensington Bike Lock (bike, not notebook!) could be opened with a simple BIC pen, Kensington sued the guy releasing the video clip for damages. That led to the counter claim and law suit against Kensington.
If you are not allowed to review a product and easily show how it fails, you are not being supposed to be sued by the product's maker.

Kensington sucks. I have a notbook lock, a rigid and a flexible bike lock. All of them are crap!

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#39 Post by christopher_wolf » Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:12 am

beeblebrox wrote:
tfflivemb2 wrote: Please do not post how you were able to unlock it, aside from using a key.

Nonsense, Kensington is faced with a class action law suit, because its products are faulty by design. And when simple video clips on the internet emerged and showed that this Kensington Bike Lock (bike, not notebook!) could be opened with a simple BIC pen, Kensington sued the guy releasing the video clip for damages. That led to the counter claim and law suit against Kensington.
If you are not allowed to review a product and easily show how it fails, you are not being supposed to be sued by the product's maker.

Kensington sucks. I have a notbook lock, a rigid and a flexible bike lock. All of them are crap!
Oh? You mean like the video that JHEM originally posted here?

http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... ington+bog

I must admit that it is pretty embarassing that the Kensington locks can get cracked like that; not much of a suprise though I guess.

Unless you have a ton of heavy duty locks mounted a la 4-point-corners on your Thinkpad in such a way as only their combo dials or keyslots are accessible, all that laptop locks do is delay the thief opening them or simply snapping the cable and making off with the laptop.
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

tfflivemb2
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 5532
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

#40 Post by tfflivemb2 » Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:31 am

beeblebrox wrote:
tfflivemb2 wrote:Please do not post how you were able to unlock it, aside from using a key.

Nonsense, Kensington is faced with a class action law suit, because its products are faulty by design. And when simple video clips on the internet emerged and showed that this Kensington Bike Lock (bike, not notebook!) could be opened with a simple BIC pen, Kensington sued the guy releasing the video clip for damages. That led to the counter claim and law suit against Kensington.
If you are not allowed to review a product and easily show how it fails, you are not being supposed to be sued by the product's maker.

Kensington sucks. I have a notbook lock, a rigid and a flexible bike lock. All of them are crap!
While you may feel that it is nonsense, IMHO I don't think that this forum should be used as a platform to advocate bypassing locks (and passwords for that matter).

As for JHEM posting that link, I had forgotten that I had read it here, but he is an Admin and is certainly welcome to do as he sees fit. THough, it should be noted that his post was more of a warning to those buying this type of lock.

The post that my comment was in response to, the poster was looking at testing it out and posting results, for the sake of doing so. There is a gray line between the two posts, but I still feel that we need to stay on the safer side of the line.

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#41 Post by christopher_wolf » Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:50 am

IMHO, the gray line gets snapped whenever somebody tries to go off and buy a lock that they think will fully protect their laptop from theft and end up getting a lock which can easily be countered; granted, such an ideal system doesn't exist, but it is as much of an obligation to alert people to the techniques that are used to bypass such security as it is to not link to it in the first place. A little searching will avail similar videos; there is a distinct difference between Reverse Engineering and learning about a system's strengths and weaknesses as opposed the gathering knowledge about a system in order to crack/break/steal it; the same goes for virus writers that try to probe a system for flaws and exploits so patches can be made against malware. If I was a consumer that wanted a lock, I would *certainly* wanted to have known about that video before purchasing a Kensington laptop lock. :)

And about the bike locks; they seriously need to make those locks better across the board for every maker, not just Kensington. As it stands, it doesn't take much thought, or force, to crack the majority of bike locks and I certainly wouldn't trust my bike to one of those kinds of locks.
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

JHEM
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 5571
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Medford, NJ USA
Contact:

#42 Post by JHEM » Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:09 am

tfflivemb2 wrote:As for JHEM posting that link, I had forgotten that I had read it here, but he is an Admin and is certainly welcome to do as he sees fit. THough, it should be noted that his post was more of a warning to those buying this type of lock.
More a case of not putting too much faith in any security measure beyond a well tuned MK VI eyeball.

A cable lock of any type shouldn't be looked at as anything beyond a low level of theft deterrent, not prevention.

Regards,

James
James at thinkpads dot com
5.5K+ posts and all I've got to show for it are some feathers.... AND a Bird wearing a Crown

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Off-Topic Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest