Network Storage Devices

Talk about "WhatEVER !"..
Post Reply
Message
Author
sliston32
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:01 pm
Location: London, UK

Network Storage Devices

#1 Post by sliston32 » Wed Sep 20, 2006 6:45 am

Hi im looking for a network storage device to use for backing up my home pc and my z60m. I was looking at a buffalo link station pro and was wondering if anyone had any experience with this or has a better suggestion. Size of the drives doesnt need to be huge but around 250g would be nice with logging and sleep mode which the link station does not have......
I have been using a second drive on the home pc but its been giving bad sector reports and i know its going to fail soon.......
looked a building a raid system as i have a spare p3 board but decided against it for space and time considerations
Thanks for your input

Sean
Z60M 2 GHz
1.5 G RAM 100 GB HDD
WIN XP PRO/SUSE 10.2 Dual Boot

bwd
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: Victoria, BC
Contact:

#2 Post by bwd » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:56 pm

Hi Sean:
I just bought a Synology NAS DS-101. I'm very happy with it so far - no problems, it is easy to use and set up, and has a lot of extra features (print server, email alerts, usb support). It also has logging and hibernate modes. The price was $110 cdn without the hard drive. I put a 320GB western digital IDE drive inside. I'm using Acronis True Image Home to do daily backups and it's working well. Here is a review link:

http://www.tomsnetworking.com/2005/02/2 ... index.html

dave
Victoria BC, Canada Image
T60 2007-72U / 2GHz T2500 / 2GB RAM / 100GB@7200 / 15" Flexview 1400x1050 / X1400 (128MB) / IBM 11abg / BT / 6 + 9 cell / XP Pro

sliston32
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:01 pm
Location: London, UK

#3 Post by sliston32 » Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:47 am

Dave

cheers, an interesting alternative with better fetures.

Sean
Z60M 2 GHz
1.5 G RAM 100 GB HDD
WIN XP PRO/SUSE 10.2 Dual Boot

BillMorrow
*Senior* Admin
*Senior* Admin
Posts: 7154
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 9:40 pm
Location: San Francisco -> Florida -> Georgia
Contact:

#4 Post by BillMorrow » Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:23 am

i just MUST add, here, that i use acronis to make images and i store them on surplus 2.5 inch drives accumulated through the last few years..
especially since thinkpads have moved to SATA from PATA, i use all my older 60gig and 100gig PATA drives is a cheap (under $20 USD) external USB2 HDD box..

very handy and convienent..

the only better solution is a raid in an external box..

i use a 500gig raid1 in my desktop box to have redundant storage..
Bill Morrow, kept by parrots :parrot: & cockatoos
Sysop - forum.thinkpads.com

*
She was not what you would call refined,
She was not what you would call unrefined,
She was the type of person who kept a parrot.
~~~Mark Twain~~~

egibbs
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 6:05 am
Location: New Jersey

#5 Post by egibbs » Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:49 am

I have both a Linkstation (160 GB model) and a Netgear SC-101 with a 300 GB Seagate in it.

The Linkstation is fine - just sits there and does it's thing with no bother.

The Netgear works ok, but the software insists on installing it as a virtual local drive rather than a standard network drive. I guess for some people that is easier to understand, but it means you need to install a bunch of proprietary drivers and networking software. I would much prefer to access it as a standard network drive, but it doesn't give you that option.

Ed Gibbs

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#6 Post by jdhurst » Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:58 am

egibbs wrote:I have both a Linkstation (160 GB model) and a Netgear SC-101 with a 300 GB Seagate in it.

The Linkstation is fine - just sits there and does it's thing with no bother.

The Netgear works ok, but the software insists on installing it as a virtual local drive rather than a standard network drive. I guess for some people that is easier to understand, but it means you need to install a bunch of proprietary drivers and networking software. I would much prefer to access it as a standard network drive, but it doesn't give you that option.

Ed Gibbs
Is that virtual local drive a dynamic volume according to Disk Management Tools? If so, the volume cannot be moved to a different machine. Thanks, ... JD Hurst

egibbs
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 6:05 am
Location: New Jersey

#7 Post by egibbs » Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:52 am

Dunno, and I'm not on my home network right now to look.

You can certainly see and access the Netgear volume from multiple machines as long as you install the software - I have it on two different machines and it shows up like a local drive.

Slow as Eskimo snot though. Moving a 2 GB mpeg to it takes about 1/2 hour.

Ed Gibbs

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#8 Post by jdhurst » Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:56 am

egibbs wrote:Dunno, and I'm not on my home network right now to look.

You can certainly see and access the Netgear volume from multiple machines as long as you install the software - I have it on two different machines and it shows up like a local drive.

Slow as Eskimo snot though. Moving a 2 GB mpeg to it takes about 1/2 hour.

Ed Gibbs
That probably means the disk is operating in PIO mode (it probably can't do Ultra DMA over a network). And 'Mode' is independent of "basic / dynamic"
... JD Hurst

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Off-Topic Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests