Greenpeace not happy with Apple; Apple not caring

Talk about "WhatEVER !"..
Post Reply
Message
Author
christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

Greenpeace not happy with Apple; Apple not caring

#1 Post by christopher_wolf » Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:37 pm

Latest Communique from our comrades at Greenpeace;

http://www.theregister.com/2006/09/26/g ... _campaign/

...Really?

Imagine that; Clean Design != Clean Product. This is, apparently, a revelation to our re...green comrades at Greenpeace.

Who would have imagined that their Apple laptops, which has all the appeal of a large designer piece of candy as well as minimalist elements, could contain any of those *icky* chemicals? This is not, obviously, hypocrisy and knee-jerk impulses. Not at all.

And, no, I am not bitter about the hijacking of the word "Organic" to mean something other than, simply put, "Made with Carbon atoms"...At least not today. :lol:
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Greenpeace not happy with Apple; Apple not caring

#2 Post by mattbiernat » Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:11 pm

article wrote:hybrid-engined battle tank
i love this quote! it exactly describes how greens work. they are often more problematic than helpful.

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

Re: Greenpeace not happy with Apple; Apple not caring

#3 Post by christopher_wolf » Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:05 pm

mattbiernat wrote:
article wrote:hybrid-engined battle tank
i love this quote! it exactly describes how greens work. they are often more problematic than helpful.
The Germans, during WWII, actually had some advanced King Tiger (a misnomer according to some historians, but their nomenclature for the tanks was *very* complex) tank prototypes that used electric transmissions and drives, for both the Henschel and Porsche chassis/turret versions.

The difference between this and a hybrid-battle tank from Greenpeace? The King Tiger electric prototypes actually *worked* many years ago to begin with, even though they required essential materials for the transmission and other parts special to them that germany was in shortage of during the war (hence the decision upon the variant that didn't use it). :D
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#4 Post by leoblob » Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:28 pm

I sure wish we didn't have threads like this on this board. :(
TP360 • TP365x • i1452 • TP T42 • Intellistation Z Pro

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Greenpeace not happy with Apple; Apple not caring

#5 Post by mattbiernat » Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:55 pm

christopher_wolf wrote: The Germans, during WWII, actually had some advanced King Tiger (a misnomer according to some historians, but their nomenclature for the tanks was *very* complex) tank prototypes that used electric transmissions and drives, for both the Henschel and Porsche chassis/turret versions.
I find it amazing how war can speed up progress in science. World War II saw a number of inventions such as radars, jet engines, rockets.
leoblob wrote:I sure wish we didn't have threads like this on this board. :(
why not? i 've just learned something very interesting about german tiger tank and this is in the off topic section.

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#6 Post by christopher_wolf » Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:06 am

There tends to be a small trend in Wars and the progress of Technology. Ever since the first world war, quite a few technological inventions have been developed and have found useful niches in the market; one of the biggest examples of this was the Cold War. It didn't go hot (most of the time), but it sure did spur on research and space exploration. It was one of the reasons that there were quite a few firsts made pretty far away from earth (the moon landing comes to mind) as well as the launches of many probes that provided valuable scientific information. So while wars are generally considered "bad," they also have a silver lining in that they sure are one heck of a motivation for technological progress; given that necessity is the mother of innovation. :)
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#7 Post by leoblob » Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:17 am

Because, in my opinion, the original intent of this thread was to engage in a political discussion. I'm on several message boards--none of them with the high standards were have here--and all of them do not permit any posts with religious, political, or sexual nature... even in their Off-Topic section.

The fact that this post is turning into a discussion of technology does not change my mind that the original intent was of a political nature... Quoting from the original post, "Latest Communique from our comrades at Greenpeace," and "...could contain any of those *icky* chemicals? This is not, obviously, hypocrisy and knee-jerk impulses. Not at all."

I don't see how you can deny that there's any sort of political agenda in the original post, or that it's a politically-motivated shot taken at a group with a potentially political agenda.

If politics/religion/sex are OK in the Off-Topic area of this board, that's up to the folks running the show here. I just didn't realize it.

440roadrunner
Sophomore Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:02 pm

#8 Post by 440roadrunner » Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:22 am

Tiger tanks were nothing at all to do with hybrid drive, the idea of which is to save braking energy in the battery so it can be "re used." They may have been advanced for their day, but somewhere, there was a truck way back in the 20's that I've read about that used this technology, and when electric motors and generators were far less than they were in WWII

German tanks were nothing more than what is known here in the US as "Diesel electric" drive, where the mechanics of a complicated transmission and shifting mechanism is simply replaced by a generator at the engine, and electric motors at the wheels.

In many ways, for huge heavy equipment such as the (in)famous Letourneau equipment, virtually all US railroad engines, and a few other things here and there, such as large mining shovels, Diesel electric power is much simpler than a hydraulic or mechanical counterpart.


Probably a closer match to modern hybrid drive is a Diesel submarine, but they don't even fit as applied to the modern context.

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

#9 Post by mattbiernat » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:48 am

leoblob wrote:Because, in my opinion, the original intent of this thread was to engage in a political discussion.
you know this is the only forum on the internet that i decided to join and participate. i've noticed there are two kinds of forums on the internet:
1) those that are overly restrictive and you can't talk almost about anything because of fear of retribution from the moderator
2) those that are not moderated end up behaving like uncivilized group of monkeys
I found this forum not to belong to any of these two groups. Many people in here are highly educated. Perhaps if you believe that green party is doing a very good job rating environment friendly companies, you could enlighten us why you think like that.

EDIT: LOL that's what happens when im half way asleep! I meant green peace and not green party. :o
Last edited by mattbiernat on Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#10 Post by leoblob » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:54 am

What is the "green party"?

GomJabbar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9765
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:57 am

#11 Post by GomJabbar » Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:11 pm

leoblob wrote:What is the "green party"?
For general information such as this, www.wikipedia.org is a good place to search to get an overview. Read a little about "green party" here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_party
DKB

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#12 Post by leoblob » Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:23 pm

I asked a moderator, and I was informed that political topics and discussion are OK on this board. I apologize for disrupting this thread.

Bob

skitty4gzus
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 620
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:07 pm
Location: Midland, MI

#13 Post by skitty4gzus » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:10 pm

This is not only captivating information to me, but its something I dont necessarily know much about. Keep pumping us with your knowledge and one day maybe some of it will bleed through the screen and magically make me closer to genius. Maybe then I could get an icon of a parrot with a crown on its head? Its gonna be a few years before that happens.
My New Baby! T42p 2373-HVU

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Off-Topic Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests