The New York Times (AP) wrote:In this first successful experiment, researchers from the United States and England were able to cloak a copper cylinder.
It's like a mirage, where heat causes the bending of light rays and cloaks the road ahead behind an image of the sky.
''We have built an artificial mirage that can hide something from would-be observers in any direction,'' said cloak designer David Schurig, a research associate in Duke University's electrical and computer engineering department.
The Philadelphia Experiment revisited
The Philadelphia Experiment revisited
FYI: Scientists Create Cloak of Invisibility
DKB
-
dsigma6
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:13 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
I was reading this story yesterday on comcast, and figured it to be like the last "cloak" i read about; using a setup involving a computer, a projection screen, cameras and some other gadgetry...but this appears to be the real deal. Very encouraging for the future, but this will be used against us in manners that could make us wish it was never invented. Once they have a cloak radar that picks up all sorts of waves, they'll have to get even more creative.
[Current] [Dell Latitude D630] : [Past] [T43] [T40] [T23] [T20] [R40] [X22] [600E] [570] [765D]
-
tfflivemb2
- Moderator1

- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
-
Thinkpaddict
- Senior Member

- Posts: 504
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:15 am
- Location: Sacramento, California
-
440roadrunner
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:02 pm
As a former Navy RADAR technician, my specialty was Ground Controlled Approach, and on one unit we had something called "Moving Target Indicator".
This essentially envolved two twin IF amplifier strips, to produce equal and opposite signals, with a delay line in one path equal to the "trip" through one amplifier.
The idea was that you exactly matched the main signal with one which was exactly 180 out of phase. Since the delay on a moving target (the airplane) changes constantly, then supposedly things like rocks, trees, and hills gets eliminated.
(This works vaguely similar to the audio noise reduction systems, I believe Mercedes and others are playing with)
I've wondered from time to time, when this could be applied to light.
This essentially envolved two twin IF amplifier strips, to produce equal and opposite signals, with a delay line in one path equal to the "trip" through one amplifier.
The idea was that you exactly matched the main signal with one which was exactly 180 out of phase. Since the delay on a moving target (the airplane) changes constantly, then supposedly things like rocks, trees, and hills gets eliminated.
(This works vaguely similar to the audio noise reduction systems, I believe Mercedes and others are playing with)
I've wondered from time to time, when this could be applied to light.
-
christopher_wolf
- Special Member
- Posts: 5741
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
- Location: UC Berkeley, California
- Contact:
There are a few peoblems with that as a cloaking device;
1.) You won't be able to see out of it, obviously. Biggest problem.
2.) It isn't entirely stealth, given the proper conditions, it will produce an interference pattern; not only that, but you are changing the path of the light as well...So you could also pick up a "difference" map of the light as it takes a tad longer to travel in a path around the object as it would otherwise have gone in a straight line.
3.) If you used a very short wave pulse, you would get what amounts to a "blur" effect upon the reciept of those beams at some other sensor (be they reflected or simply bent very litte, in which case you need to have another sensor at the end). Comparing it to the original wave pattern would easily show the difference and the outline of the cloaked object. This is why the stealth ship "Sea Shadow" couldn't be too stealth as it would show up on a look-down-shoot-down radar system as a giant hole in a bunch of waves, especially it's own wake. It is kind of like a holographic device, except in reverse and you can only get the outlines assuming that the cloaking system is good enough to bend *all* the incident rays of light or other EM such as microwaves (i.e. it would be extremely hard to bend a ray inbound directly *normal* to any given flat surface on the object).
1.) You won't be able to see out of it, obviously. Biggest problem.
2.) It isn't entirely stealth, given the proper conditions, it will produce an interference pattern; not only that, but you are changing the path of the light as well...So you could also pick up a "difference" map of the light as it takes a tad longer to travel in a path around the object as it would otherwise have gone in a straight line.
3.) If you used a very short wave pulse, you would get what amounts to a "blur" effect upon the reciept of those beams at some other sensor (be they reflected or simply bent very litte, in which case you need to have another sensor at the end). Comparing it to the original wave pattern would easily show the difference and the outline of the cloaked object. This is why the stealth ship "Sea Shadow" couldn't be too stealth as it would show up on a look-down-shoot-down radar system as a giant hole in a bunch of waves, especially it's own wake. It is kind of like a holographic device, except in reverse and you can only get the outlines assuming that the cloaking system is good enough to bend *all* the incident rays of light or other EM such as microwaves (i.e. it would be extremely hard to bend a ray inbound directly *normal* to any given flat surface on the object).
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c
~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"
~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"
If they're as durable as most fanboys claim them to be I'm sure they'd be able to take itThinkpaddict wrote:Very interesting. I doubt they will make an effective cloaking device anytime this century, but it is a nice start. About cloaking devices for unattended Thinkpads, beware what you wish for! You wouldn't want to inadvertently sit on your Thinkpad now, would you?
760ED All the way.
FEEL THE BURN! From the bottom of that particular laptop... right in the bawsack! eek
FEEL THE BURN! From the bottom of that particular laptop... right in the bawsack! eek
-
Thinkpaddict
- Senior Member

- Posts: 504
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:15 am
- Location: Sacramento, California
I am sure it depends on the person doing the sittinggearguy wrote:If they're as durable as most fanboys claim them to be I'm sure they'd be able to take itThinkpaddict wrote:Very interesting. I doubt they will make an effective cloaking device anytime this century, but it is a nice start. About cloaking devices for unattended Thinkpads, beware what you wish for! You wouldn't want to inadvertently sit on your Thinkpad now, would you?
-
wswartzendruber
- Junior Member

- Posts: 377
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:33 am
- Location: Idaho, USA
When my T22 gave up the ghost (bloated charging capacitor), I took the thing and slammed it into a pillar as hard as I could twice. Nothing.Thinkpaddict wrote:Very interesting. I doubt they will make an effective cloaking device anytime this century, but it is a nice start. About cloaking devices for unattended Thinkpads, beware what you wish for! You wouldn't want to inadvertently sit on your Thinkpad now, would you?
Model: Lenovo ThinkPad T400
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, 3 MB L2 Cache)
RAM: 4 GB PC-8500 (1067 MHz, Dual-channel)
HDD: 500 GB, 54000 RPM
Audio: Conexant CX20561 (192 kHz, 24-bit)
Video: Intel GMA 4500MHD
Wireless: Intel 5300
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, 3 MB L2 Cache)
RAM: 4 GB PC-8500 (1067 MHz, Dual-channel)
HDD: 500 GB, 54000 RPM
Audio: Conexant CX20561 (192 kHz, 24-bit)
Video: Intel GMA 4500MHD
Wireless: Intel 5300
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Flush-mount Laptop Adapters Part 7: SD/SDHC/SDXC Revisited *PICS*
by dr_st » Tue May 02, 2017 3:36 am » in Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions - 0 Replies
- 491 Views
-
Last post by dr_st
Tue May 02, 2017 3:36 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




