$585 Million Plea in LCD Price-Fixing

Talk about "WhatEVER !"..
Post Reply

Non Availability of 4:3 screens due to price fixing or some kind of price gouging scheme by LCD manufacturers ?

Poll ended at Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:34 pm

yes
9
53%
no
5
29%
Cannot say
3
18%
 
Total votes: 17

Message
Author
rssb
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Richmond,VA

$585 Million Plea in LCD Price-Fixing

#1 Post by rssb » Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

There is a news article running now:

***************************************
$585 Million Plea in LCD Price-Fixing

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: November 12, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) — Three electronics companies have agreed to plead guilty and pay $585 million in fines for conspiring to drive up prices for people buying computers, TVs and other LCD screens.

In a plea deal filed Wednesday, LG, Sharp and Chunghwa Picture Tubes agreed to cooperate in an antitrust investigation being run by the Justice Department.

*******************************************

Is it possible that the non availability of regular 4:3 screens to do something with this ?

j-dawg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:32 pm
Location: PGH, PA

#2 Post by j-dawg » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:07 am

I think the shortage of 4:3 screens has more to do with the fact that nobody wants them anymore.

I'm not saying that's a correct sentiment, but I don't think it has anything to do with price fixing.
X61 Tablet - 1.6GHz C2D, SXGA+, 1GB RAM, 100GB HD, Vista Business.

i have other laptops but i'll be honest i never use 'em

Superego
Sophomore Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

#3 Post by Superego » Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:58 am

Agreed. Once people hopped on the widescreen bandwagon (or they were told to) it kind of killed the demand for 4:3 screens, and caused me to die a little inside :cry:.
W510: i7-820QM / 8GB 1066 RAM/ 1 GB NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M / 500GB 7200rpm / 15.6" HD 1080 / Arch Linux

beGi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Pag; Croatia

#4 Post by beGi » Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:23 am

j-dawg wrote:I think the shortage of 4:3 screens has more to do with the fact that nobody wants them anymore.

Not true, i want them. And i'm not saying that i would like to see every notebook in 4:3 format, atleast to have them on offer. Both formats have pros&cons...

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15740
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

#5 Post by ajkula66 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:06 pm

Anyone who follows this and other notebook forums knows that the demand for 4:3 ratio is still very much there, but the offers are not...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: T61p

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

rssb
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: Richmond,VA

#6 Post by rssb » Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:24 pm

Thanks to whoever moved it to the correct forum !.

The demand is definitely there, most people working in professional enviroment ( atleast where I work) miss the 4:3 screens. There was a survey taken and 93% people said they would prefer the 4:3 screen over widescreen, if all the other hardware remained the same.

AlphaKilo470
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2737
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:

#7 Post by AlphaKilo470 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:37 pm

I really prefer to do my work on a standard definition screen. However, I do enjoy having the wide angle for television viewing.

From my angle, widescreens are easier to market because they are still relatively new to the public and at the same time, it makes it easier on manufacturers to just produce one or the other; whether it be widescreen or standard def.
ThinkPad T60: 2GHZ CD T2500, 3gb RAM, 14.1" XGA, 60gb 7k100, Win 7 Ult
Latitude E7250: i5 5300U 2.3ghz, 12gb RAM, 12" 1080p touch, 256gb SSD, Win 10

Truthfinder
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Jersey by the Sea

#8 Post by Truthfinder » Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:53 am

ajkula66 wrote:Anyone who follows this and other notebook forums knows that the demand for 4:3 ratio is still very much there, but the offers are not...
I fully agree..................

I would like to buy a T400, but don NOT want the wide screen.... Yes, they are great for playing videos, but more than not, Thinkpad users, more over T series users are using ThinkPads for business use and this does not cover watching videos......... The 4x3 LCD is the way to go................ My 2 cents.

the Truthfinder :-)
ThinkPad T-60 2623D7U, 4GB Kingston HyperX / ThinkPad T-60P 2008-83U , 4GB Kingston HyperX.
Running Windows 7 on both units. Dedicated ThinkPad user for about 18 years.

ZaZ
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4460
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: Minnesota

#9 Post by ZaZ » Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:17 pm

I can live with the widescreen, though I prefer standard, but I'd prefer a higher quality panel instead of the junk they've been giving us of late.
E7440

Truthfinder
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Jersey by the Sea

#10 Post by Truthfinder » Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:38 am

FredGarvin wrote:I can live with the widescreen, though I prefer standard, but I'd prefer a higher quality panel instead of the junk they've been giving us of late.

Yes, I fully agree. The LCDs that they are pushing on us are typical junk, unlike what we have come to enjoy from the past, when IBM was at the helm..... Oh well, maybe Lenovo will wise up and get back to the business of providing quality LCDs with vivid imaging.
ThinkPad T-60 2623D7U, 4GB Kingston HyperX / ThinkPad T-60P 2008-83U , 4GB Kingston HyperX.
Running Windows 7 on both units. Dedicated ThinkPad user for about 18 years.

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

#11 Post by mattbiernat » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:23 pm

statistically statistics are incorrect 50% of the time.
i think that most people, the consumer market want widescreen because they can play movies on their laptop. i know... i know... you can use a TV to play your movie but most people seem to be using laptops as music, internet and DVD players. a little bit of word processing here and there.
so this explains why everybody wants widecreen, plus it sounds cool doesn't it? "i have a WIDESCREEN laptop"

beGi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Pag; Croatia

#12 Post by beGi » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:00 pm

mattbiernat wrote:statistically statistics are incorrect 50% of the time.
??? :?
mattbiernat wrote: i think that most people, the consumer market want widescreen because they can play movies on their laptop...
Maybe, and it does feel better to play movies on 16:9, but 4:3=mobility...

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

#13 Post by mattbiernat » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:11 pm

beGi wrote:
mattbiernat wrote:statistically statistics are incorrect 50% of the time.
??? :?
mattbiernat wrote:
what i mean is that statistics are very easily manipulated. that's where the saying comes from. learned in freshmen year English course.
but yes i do prefer 4:3. too bad they are gone.

beGi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Pag; Croatia

#14 Post by beGi » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:27 pm

English course and statistics, strange combination... It's true that someone who knows nothing about statistics can be easily manipulated, but others who do (myself included) will almost instantly know that something smells bad, or atleast not to take it for granted... Skepticism my friend(s) is the only way to know the truth...

Truthfinder
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Jersey by the Sea

16x9 vs: 4x3

#15 Post by Truthfinder » Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:11 pm

For myself, I would opt for a 4"x3" screen as I use my THINKPAD as a tool, not a movie machine, music toy and the such. This is actually why I went with IBM nearly 14 years ago.
If I was in the market for a toy, I would have purchased a H.P./ Acer, or one of the other $399.00 junkers.

JUST my 2 cents.

But, to each his / her own.

Best to all :-)
ThinkPad T-60 2623D7U, 4GB Kingston HyperX / ThinkPad T-60P 2008-83U , 4GB Kingston HyperX.
Running Windows 7 on both units. Dedicated ThinkPad user for about 18 years.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Off-Topic Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest