lophiomys wrote:My point with Linux is, that if there are annoyances, you find a informative error log l all the time, you fix it and it is running forever.
Uh, no, you don't. I've worked with various Linux versions, and I know there isn't always an informative log. Or maybe it's there somewhere buried under thousands of lines of useless junk that somebody thinks are important to log, which is as good as unexisting. Or maybe it's there but it's not informative to you because you don't understand what the heck it says, and you have to search online to decipher it. Granted, in the end you will get to the bottom of it, but you would probably be just as lucky for searching for solutions for Windows problems.
lophiomys wrote:On the other side Windows, does inexplicable things all the time, even Win7, there are often misleading error messages, or you simply don't know whats going on, and sometimes it helps to reboot twice. I'm just fed up with this.
So you don't know how to handle Windows as well as you handle Linux. There are people that are the opposite. That doesn't make Linux or Windows superior to one another.
Bottom line is that all these error messages and logs were written by people. If you suggest that the people who write logs and error messages for Linux are somewhat inherently doing a better job than the Windows people, we'll have to agree to disagree.
My experience shows that on average Linux is not more or less problematic than Windows - just different. And locating the solution to the problem takes (at least me) on average the same amount of time on both operating systems.