No extra strengthening was needed for the roof in order to support the solar panels. There is no absolute requirement that the roof and solar be done at the same time but it helps if both companies are involved so that what one company does (or doesn't do) won't affect the other. The solar company knew the roofers we selected and everything went smoothly. The ROI assumed a 5.5% annual increase in utility costs which I thought was a little high but with gasoline prices now topping out at just over $4/gal here in the South Bay, that might have been a conservative estimate

. The only real hiccups with this project were with the local power company (PG&E) and the configuration of the Envoy monitoring service. PG&E took their time coming out to inspect and approve the installation. The panels were ready to go for over four weeks before they were connected to the grid.
Once that happened I was able to get the data from the Envoy gateway directly from my home network. There's a web server built into the box that allows you to see the status of each microinverter and solar panel from any browser. It was also reporting that the internet connection to the Enlighten servers was good. However, Enlighten kept saying that they couldn't see my system. After a couple of go-arounds with Enlighten and Real Goods Solar everything was sorted out. My guess was that either Real Goods did not send Enlighten the physical map of the system, or Enlighten lost it the first time, or there was some miscommunication of account numbers. What you see on the Enphase web site for my installation accurately reflects the arrangement of each solar panel on my roof. There's three rows of panels, consisting of 6, 6 and 8. They are all facing south; the 180° in the upper right corner of the map. Visitors to the web site can see general information about the power but when I log into my account, I can click on each panel and get individual information just about that panel. This allows me to monitor the efficiency over time. This service was built into the cost of the installation for the first five years. After that, it's $180 for another five years of monitoring. I think it's a small cost for the peace of mind that it can deliver.
The monitoring service is one of the reasons why I opted for using microinverters instead of a single (large) inverter at the power panel. Additionally, if our electrical needs increase in the future, or if another family moving into the house needs more power, it's much easier to add on solar panels with this system. It also provides for more uniform power generation in the event one or more panels is shaded or develops a defect. With a traditional single inverter system, if one panel's output drops to 50%, the entire system goes down to 50%. It's the effect of the "weakest link". Using microinverters, one for every two solar panels in my case, when one panel gets shaded it only affects that microinverter's contribution to the overall system. Since there are 10 microinverters on the roof, that's a 10% power drop at the most.
The few bad things about microinverters is that it introduces more points of failure in the system and system costs are more than a single inverter. Although they are warrantied for 15 years and have a supposed MTBF of 100+ years (

), having more "pieces" in a system always means more chances of having problems or needing replacement later on.