Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
-
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
How's the A4-5000 CPU in an x140e compare to the T2500 Core Duo in performance? I know they're about 7 years apart and the latter is only 32bit. But just as far as snappiness in browsing and basic tasks, what might I expect?
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
Based on what I could remember about Kabini, it is approximately around the speed of an equally clocked Clawhammer. That isn't too bad, but a Dothan could easily keep pace with a Clawhammer, clock-for-clock.
On the Intel side, the Yonah Core Duo is essentially 2 die-shrunken Dothans in 1 die on a substrate with their L2 caches unified. Some minor additions such as SSE3 were also included, but that does not affect the overall instructions-per-clock in comparison to Dothan. Unless that specific application heavily uses SSE3 instructions.
As for the A4-5000 vs Core Duo T2500 comparison, I am afraid that I can't give a very accurate answer. I can only roughly guess that the A4-5000 would be no match for the T2500 in single-threaded operations, but the A4-5000 will be far exceeding the multi-threaded capabilities of the T2500. As in, something like a approximate two-fold boost in multi-threaded performance.
In basic tasks, such as what you mentioned, would be far more suitable and responsive for the A4-5000. This is only assuming that the latest features (4 cores are used properly) of the A4-5000 are used, though. However, in specific tasks that require better single-threaded performance, expect the T2500 to be slightly quicker.
On the Intel side, the Yonah Core Duo is essentially 2 die-shrunken Dothans in 1 die on a substrate with their L2 caches unified. Some minor additions such as SSE3 were also included, but that does not affect the overall instructions-per-clock in comparison to Dothan. Unless that specific application heavily uses SSE3 instructions.
As for the A4-5000 vs Core Duo T2500 comparison, I am afraid that I can't give a very accurate answer. I can only roughly guess that the A4-5000 would be no match for the T2500 in single-threaded operations, but the A4-5000 will be far exceeding the multi-threaded capabilities of the T2500. As in, something like a approximate two-fold boost in multi-threaded performance.
In basic tasks, such as what you mentioned, would be far more suitable and responsive for the A4-5000. This is only assuming that the latest features (4 cores are used properly) of the A4-5000 are used, though. However, in specific tasks that require better single-threaded performance, expect the T2500 to be slightly quicker.
-
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
Thanks, Screamer. I put in an eBay order for an x140e. I'm anxious to see how it does when I get it. No matter what, I'm sure it'll at least run cooler than my T2500 T60. 

-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 2743
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 am
- Location: Metro Manila, Philippines
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
If the OS you use is like Windows 10 that has a nasty habit of running programs behind your back (downloading and installing updates), then a quad-core like the A4-5000 might be a better idea. Had Win 10 installed on an X61T (with 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo L7700) and the background tasks ate up an entire CPU core.
Having a quad-core means losing only 25% of your CPU power, as opposed to half on a dual-core CPU.
Also, an SSD is highly recommended-- my mom has a quad-core Celeron N3160 laptop, which was slow as molasses with Windows 10 and HDD; upgrading the HDD to a budget SSD (WD Green 120GB) made it much better.

Also, an SSD is highly recommended-- my mom has a quad-core Celeron N3160 laptop, which was slow as molasses with Windows 10 and HDD; upgrading the HDD to a budget SSD (WD Green 120GB) made it much better.
Daily driver: X220 4291-C91 i7-2620M
Backup: X601 Core 2 Duo T8100
Toy: X60F Core Solo U1300
On loan: X220 4291-P79 i5-2520M
In pieces: two retired but working X61Ts
RIP: 760XD 9546-U9E; X61 7676-A24; and a BOE-Hydis HV121P01-100 in failed SXGA+ mod
Backup: X601 Core 2 Duo T8100
Toy: X60F Core Solo U1300
On loan: X220 4291-P79 i5-2520M
In pieces: two retired but working X61Ts
RIP: 760XD 9546-U9E; X61 7676-A24; and a BOE-Hydis HV121P01-100 in failed SXGA+ mod

-
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
Well, the x140e arrived. I upgraded it to 8GB and put a 256GB Samsung 850Pro SSD in it. It's snappier than I thought it would be. Battery life pretty amazing, too. Although I much prefer the 1400x1050 screen on the T60, I'm still pretty happy with this unit.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Found: Thinkpad P53 with RTX 5000
by RMSMajestic » Fri Nov 13, 2020 4:26 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 1 Replies
- 312 Views
-
Last post by Brad
Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:09 am
-
-
- 8 Replies
- 2687 Views
-
Last post by thealphaoverseer
Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:18 am
-
-
SOLD: 51NB ThinkPad X210 Pre-1st Gen Intel Core i5-8250U 8GB DDR4 RAM 1920x1200 IPS
by stanleylieber » Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:26 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 0 Replies
- 408 Views
-
Last post by stanleylieber
Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:26 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests