Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
-
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
How's the A4-5000 CPU in an x140e compare to the T2500 Core Duo in performance? I know they're about 7 years apart and the latter is only 32bit. But just as far as snappiness in browsing and basic tasks, what might I expect?
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
Based on what I could remember about Kabini, it is approximately around the speed of an equally clocked Clawhammer. That isn't too bad, but a Dothan could easily keep pace with a Clawhammer, clock-for-clock.
On the Intel side, the Yonah Core Duo is essentially 2 die-shrunken Dothans in 1 die on a substrate with their L2 caches unified. Some minor additions such as SSE3 were also included, but that does not affect the overall instructions-per-clock in comparison to Dothan. Unless that specific application heavily uses SSE3 instructions.
As for the A4-5000 vs Core Duo T2500 comparison, I am afraid that I can't give a very accurate answer. I can only roughly guess that the A4-5000 would be no match for the T2500 in single-threaded operations, but the A4-5000 will be far exceeding the multi-threaded capabilities of the T2500. As in, something like a approximate two-fold boost in multi-threaded performance.
In basic tasks, such as what you mentioned, would be far more suitable and responsive for the A4-5000. This is only assuming that the latest features (4 cores are used properly) of the A4-5000 are used, though. However, in specific tasks that require better single-threaded performance, expect the T2500 to be slightly quicker.
On the Intel side, the Yonah Core Duo is essentially 2 die-shrunken Dothans in 1 die on a substrate with their L2 caches unified. Some minor additions such as SSE3 were also included, but that does not affect the overall instructions-per-clock in comparison to Dothan. Unless that specific application heavily uses SSE3 instructions.
As for the A4-5000 vs Core Duo T2500 comparison, I am afraid that I can't give a very accurate answer. I can only roughly guess that the A4-5000 would be no match for the T2500 in single-threaded operations, but the A4-5000 will be far exceeding the multi-threaded capabilities of the T2500. As in, something like a approximate two-fold boost in multi-threaded performance.
In basic tasks, such as what you mentioned, would be far more suitable and responsive for the A4-5000. This is only assuming that the latest features (4 cores are used properly) of the A4-5000 are used, though. However, in specific tasks that require better single-threaded performance, expect the T2500 to be slightly quicker.
-
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
Thanks, Screamer. I put in an eBay order for an x140e. I'm anxious to see how it does when I get it. No matter what, I'm sure it'll at least run cooler than my T2500 T60.
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 3832
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 am
- Location: Metro Manila, Philippines
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
If the OS you use is like Windows 10 that has a nasty habit of running programs behind your back (downloading and installing updates), then a quad-core like the A4-5000 might be a better idea. Had Win 10 installed on an X61T (with 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo L7700) and the background tasks ate up an entire CPU core. Having a quad-core means losing only 25% of your CPU power, as opposed to half on a dual-core CPU.
Also, an SSD is highly recommended-- my mom has a quad-core Celeron N3160 laptop, which was slow as molasses with Windows 10 and HDD; upgrading the HDD to a budget SSD (WD Green 120GB) made it much better.
Also, an SSD is highly recommended-- my mom has a quad-core Celeron N3160 laptop, which was slow as molasses with Windows 10 and HDD; upgrading the HDD to a budget SSD (WD Green 120GB) made it much better.
Planned Purchase: T480s i5-8350 FHD Touch
Impulse Buy: Thinkpad not named for safety reasons
RIP: X220 4291-C91 X61 7676-A24 760XD-U9E
Impulse Buy: Thinkpad not named for safety reasons
RIP: X220 4291-C91 X61 7676-A24 760XD-U9E
-
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 5:23 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: A4-5000 vs T2500 Core Duo?
Well, the x140e arrived. I upgraded it to 8GB and put a 256GB Samsung 850Pro SSD in it. It's snappier than I thought it would be. Battery life pretty amazing, too. Although I much prefer the 1400x1050 screen on the T60, I'm still pretty happy with this unit.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Semi-scientific battery test: 2 core 7600U vs 4 core 1145G7
by mikemex » Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:50 am » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 1 Replies
- 1476 Views
-
Last post by mikemex
Wed Jan 17, 2024 10:31 pm
-
-
-
FS: Intel Core i7-3630QM CPU + RAM
by PiZzA EnGiNeEr » Mon Oct 30, 2023 12:26 am » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 1 Replies
- 2113 Views
-
Last post by wilocampo
Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:59 am
-
-
-
T420 - Quad Core CPU and BIOS upgrade (or downgrade)
by ojciec » Fri Dec 15, 2023 4:49 pm » in ThinkPad T400/T410/T420 and T500/T510/T520 Series - 3 Replies
- 6305 Views
-
Last post by axur-delmeria
Mon Dec 18, 2023 12:04 am
-
-
-
Is anyone selling a modded T500 mobo for quad core CPUs?
by funnylilcat » Thu Jan 11, 2024 5:37 pm » in ThinkPad T400/T410/T420 and T500/T510/T520 Series - 8 Replies
- 2305 Views
-
Last post by BillMorrow
Mon Mar 04, 2024 1:38 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests