Battery: buy, send to be rebuilt, other?
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 9:33 pm
My battery, which had been reduced to the still useful function of a highly portable Uninterupted Power Supply, stopped charging altogether the other day. (The orange light would flash continuously with the battery in place so I pulled it out according to instructions elsewhere in this forum.)
I would actually be happy enough spending very few dolloars replacing the battery with another to served the same UPS function. But I see no obvious source for doing so. (A dead battery on Ebay may well be perfectly dead.)
Alternatively, I can spend $40 or $50 before shipping and either send the battery out to be professionally rebuilt or buy one of the three new battery types that seem to be floating around (a search of 'thinkpad 600 battery' on pricegrabber.com wil turn them up).
I am, however, entirely uncertain of which is the best option. A new battery from IBM risks being rather old. In theory IBM should be in possession of proprietary information that would enable them to build a better battery. IBM competitors are using newer cells, with higher amps, and probably better chemistry. And the rebuilders are hopefully doing the same but packaging it back into the IBM designed circuitry and shell.
Any suggestions as to the best option, experiences with one or more of the alternatives, theories upon the matter generally, etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Thanx.
I would actually be happy enough spending very few dolloars replacing the battery with another to served the same UPS function. But I see no obvious source for doing so. (A dead battery on Ebay may well be perfectly dead.)
Alternatively, I can spend $40 or $50 before shipping and either send the battery out to be professionally rebuilt or buy one of the three new battery types that seem to be floating around (a search of 'thinkpad 600 battery' on pricegrabber.com wil turn them up).
I am, however, entirely uncertain of which is the best option. A new battery from IBM risks being rather old. In theory IBM should be in possession of proprietary information that would enable them to build a better battery. IBM competitors are using newer cells, with higher amps, and probably better chemistry. And the rebuilders are hopefully doing the same but packaging it back into the IBM designed circuitry and shell.
Any suggestions as to the best option, experiences with one or more of the alternatives, theories upon the matter generally, etc. would be greatly appreciated.
Thanx.