
I have been in technology since before the birth of the PC and remember the feeling I had after discovering IBM's "config disk" - remember those ? Pick any other brand of PC back then. Want to upgrade it ? Simple, crack the hood, plug in the board, load up the drivers and with a little luck, you're done.
This process on an IBM PC ? after the birth of say the PS/2's ?? my God, I wanted break the leg off the engineer(s) responsible for this "method" and beat them with it.
Now, many years later the same talent that brought you "config disks", creates sinister BIOS update routines which require not only the presence of a battery, but it must be a perfect one at that and 100% charged.
HELLO ! Thanks, but I'm perfectly comfortable using a brick and taking the risk to make sure power is not interrupted while flashing the system - just like every other manufacture warns thereby placing the risk with the user. IBM wants to protect :
a) ME ?
b) THEM ?
What a way to build customer loyalty. If it were my choice, there would never be another piece of IBM hardware in my entire oragnization.
With all the talent out there, has anyone figured out a way to either "fake out" the laptop into thinking a perfect battery is installed or is the real answer simply eliminating this protion of the routine from the flash utility (which would seem to make more sense) ?
If you have a solution, please post it ; a solid fix is needed. If you've got one, and are in the NY, NY area - the beers are on me. Been through all the other stuff listed listed on the other posts, none work and the latest utlility as we've all seen, needs a good hack.
The machines are decent and there's value to still be had using them but if IBM thinks this is the way to do things, I won't rest until their name is erased from history.