Is the original 770X 8GB HD *that* inefficient?
-
catnap1972
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:30 am
- Location: Pennsylvania USA
Is the original 770X 8GB HD *that* inefficient?
I recently replaced the original 8GB Travelstar drive with an 80GB Samsung drive that I acquired and find that I can maybe get another 30 minutes of battery life (2:30'ish vs. a shade over 2 hrs). Are the older drives this bad in terms of power usage or is this just a fluke?
One other thing about the newer drive--can't even hear it. The older drive literally sounded like a jet engine compared to this one.
One other thing about the newer drive--can't even hear it. The older drive literally sounded like a jet engine compared to this one.
-
catnap1972
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:30 am
- Location: Pennsylvania USA
I got the same drive in my T40, man that sure is a great drive silent and very energy efficient.catnap1972 wrote:New one is 5400 RPM
When i replaced the "enourmous" 4gb drive that my 600x came with a 7k100 100GB it added 45 minutes more to battery life.
So my opinion is that the original drive may not be that bad just that the newest are more efficient. Example the cache from your new drive is 8mb the old one had like 1 or 2mb. More cache means than less rotation is needed for your drive to find the info.
X32/2.0GHZ/2GB/ENGENIUS EMP-8602+S 600mw mini pci/WD 250GB
X60/1.83GHZ/2GB/Atheros/7K100
X60/1.83GHZ/2GB/Atheros/7K100
-
mattyprice4004
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:53 am
- Location: England!
I put a Toshiba 80GB 5400RPM drive in my 600E and got upto 3 hours when I could only *ever* get 2 and 10 mins at the most...
I use the extra time to kock the brightness up a bit
as the backlight in mine is a bit... knackered 
I use the extra time to kock the brightness up a bit
IBM ThinkPad 600E, PII 400MHz, 352MB PC100 SDRAM, 80GB Toshiba 5400RPM HDD, DVDROM.
-
serverbook
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:30 am
- Location: oz
Re: Is the original 770X 8GB HD *that* inefficient?
depends how the drive was set with feature tool program.catnap1972 wrote:I recently replaced the original 8GB Travelstar drive with an 80GB Samsung drive that I acquired and find that I can maybe get another 30 minutes of battery life (2:30'ish vs. a shade over 2 hrs). Are the older drives this bad in terms of power usage or is this just a fluke?
One other thing about the newer drive--can't even hear it. The older drive literally sounded like a jet engine compared to this one.
but it doesn't surpise me with 5.4 or 7.2 k drives as i have not seen them use more battery in the first hand.
samsungs are the best laptop drives going.($spent)
tp 600e gets up to30mps max sustained speeds
tp600x gets approx 28mps from their respective ata33 host busses.
thats on par with a well setup desktop running a seagate barracuda 11/30gb/ 7.2 k desktop drive running from a ata 100 (defaulted to ata66)host bus.
and about 20-25% faster tha a $4100 current spec packard bell
centrino 1.8 ghz laptop thats supposed to support ata 100 in the first hand.
thats why thinkpads rule.
work that out .
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
770X Aftermarket Battery? (*And quick PIII linux question)
by Choram » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:52 am » in ThinkPad Legacy Hardware - 1 Replies
- 928 Views
-
Last post by Dekks
Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:43 am
-
-
-
Thinkpad 770X recovery with 770Z discs?
by rheacox » Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:46 pm » in ThinkPad Legacy Hardware - 5 Replies
- 997 Views
-
Last post by fultontech
Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:20 pm
-
-
-
WTB: A X61 Tablet Motherboard and 8GB of RAM
by LibreKiller » Fri Mar 31, 2017 12:33 am » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 1 Replies
- 254 Views
-
Last post by wujstefan
Fri Mar 31, 2017 2:28 am
-
-
-
FS; Dell E7440 / 8gb ram / i5-4300U / 14" FHD touchscreen / 128gb + 320gb
by db999md » Sat Apr 08, 2017 11:02 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 0 Replies
- 246 Views
-
Last post by db999md
Sat Apr 08, 2017 11:02 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests




