600x 2645-9fu: 650mHz, or 500?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:43 pm
ok folks, thinking cap time:-)
twbook.pdf says 2645-9fu has an Intel Pentium III 650mHz, and the BIOS agrees--SpeedStep: but various speedmeters say its 500mHz, and moreover, the intel "Processor Frequency ID Utility" reports 500mHz not only as the operating frequency, also as the "Expected Frequency," defined as "the highest speed at which the tested processor was manufactured to operate."
In windows 2000 I've set the power schemes to "always on," or "minimal power management," and removed the battery to boot on wall power. And it's not OS dependent: knoppix (linux) kernel 2.6.15 also reports 500mHz.
could the BIOS be wrong? It is version ITET55WW, dated 11/30/99. (This is still the eBay seller's machine; I've not changed the BIOS.)
discussion here and elsewhere has centered upon getting the faster processors actually to run at their rated speeds. But my question--given the Intel result--is whether this machine actually *has* a 500mHz processor, and the BIOS is incorrect. You who haved swapped processors, does the BIOS get the new info, or does it persist with the old? Could some evil genius have swapped in a lesser cpu, and fooled the BIOS?
comments appreciated
thanks
tom
tom
twbook.pdf says 2645-9fu has an Intel Pentium III 650mHz, and the BIOS agrees--SpeedStep: but various speedmeters say its 500mHz, and moreover, the intel "Processor Frequency ID Utility" reports 500mHz not only as the operating frequency, also as the "Expected Frequency," defined as "the highest speed at which the tested processor was manufactured to operate."
In windows 2000 I've set the power schemes to "always on," or "minimal power management," and removed the battery to boot on wall power. And it's not OS dependent: knoppix (linux) kernel 2.6.15 also reports 500mHz.
could the BIOS be wrong? It is version ITET55WW, dated 11/30/99. (This is still the eBay seller's machine; I've not changed the BIOS.)
discussion here and elsewhere has centered upon getting the faster processors actually to run at their rated speeds. But my question--given the Intel result--is whether this machine actually *has* a 500mHz processor, and the BIOS is incorrect. You who haved swapped processors, does the BIOS get the new info, or does it persist with the old? Could some evil genius have swapped in a lesser cpu, and fooled the BIOS?
comments appreciated
thanks
tom
tom