Changing IBM bios for Phoenix or linuxbios or???? in 600x?

Older ThinkPads.. from the 600, the 7xx, the iSeries, 300, 500, the Transnote and, of course, the 701
Post Reply
Message
Author
hseaver
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Oshkosh, WI

Changing IBM bios for Phoenix or linuxbios or???? in 600x?

#1 Post by hseaver » Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:15 am

Has anyone ever tried replacing the crappy IBM bios for a better one like a Phoienix or linuxbios or AMD or ???

Robbyrobot
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

#2 Post by Robbyrobot » Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:54 am

Ever see a computer where someone flashed the wrong BIOS? :wink:
Makes a good doorstop, but not much else.

The BIOS chips aren't even socketed in the Thinkpads, so you can't replace them if you make a mistake.

About the only chance you'd have is if someone with a great deal of BIOS and assembly language knowledge had done some modifications for specifically your machine, but I haven't seen anything like that yet.

Like it or not, I think we're stuck...

dmitrio
Freshman Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:52 am
Location: MumbaUmba, MaltaPalta
Contact:

Re: Changing IBM bios for Phoenix or linuxbios or???? in 600

#3 Post by dmitrio » Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:15 pm

hseaver wrote:Has anyone ever tried replacing the crappy IBM bios for a better one like a Phoienix or linuxbios or AMD or ???
I wish, but no linuxbios on laptops so far
linuxbios.org

hseaver
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Oshkosh, WI

#4 Post by hseaver » Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:11 am

Actually there is linuxbios on some laptops. In fact it works on the Thinkpad T23. Anybody know what Northbridge and Southbridge chips the 600x uses?
A31 1.6GHZ 1GB
560x 266mhz 96mb
600x 500mhz 589mb

dmitrio
Freshman Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:52 am
Location: MumbaUmba, MaltaPalta
Contact:

#5 Post by dmitrio » Mon Aug 06, 2007 7:33 pm

hseaver wrote:Actually there is linuxbios on some laptops. In fact it works on the Thinkpad T23. Anybody know what Northbridge and Southbridge chips the 600x uses?
would you provide some info, links about linuxbios on laptops?
it would be interesting, full bootup in 3-4 sec instead of hibernation...
tnx

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#6 Post by jdhurst » Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:39 pm

dmitrio wrote:<snip>
it would be interesting, full bootup in 3-4 sec instead of hibernation...
tnx
Boot up time has precious little to do with BIOS, and NO Linux system I have run going back to RedHat 6 full boots in 3 seconds.
... JDH

hseaver
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Oshkosh, WI

#7 Post by hseaver » Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:43 pm

dmitrio wrote:
hseaver wrote:Actually there is linuxbios on some laptops. In fact it works on the Thinkpad T23. Anybody know what Northbridge and Southbridge chips the 600x uses?
would you provide some info, links about linuxbios on laptops?
it would be interesting, full bootup in 3-4 sec instead of hibernation...
tnx
Here was where I saw the TP T23 listed:
http://linuxbios.org/Supported_Motherbo ... inuxBIOSv1

But, elsewhere on the linuxbios website they spoke of the difficulties in porting it to laptops:

http://linuxbios.org/Laptop

Primarilly because most laptops, including IBM's, are not actually made by the company that sells them, and so there are many undocumented aspects. Which is something I never knew before.
A31 1.6GHZ 1GB
560x 266mhz 96mb
600x 500mhz 589mb

dmitrio
Freshman Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:52 am
Location: MumbaUmba, MaltaPalta
Contact:

boot time

#8 Post by dmitrio » Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:51 pm

jdhurst wrote:Boot up time has precious little to do with BIOS, and NO Linux system I have run going back to RedHat 6 full boots in 3 seconds.
... JDH
Front page http://linuxbios.org/Welcome_to_LinuxBIOS give this timing
Fast boot times (3 seconds from power-on to Linux console)

dmitrio
Freshman Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:52 am
Location: MumbaUmba, MaltaPalta
Contact:

same site discussion

#9 Post by dmitrio » Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:54 pm

hseaver wrote: Here was where I saw the TP T23 listed:
http://linuxbios.org/Supported_Motherbo ... inuxBIOSv1

But, elsewhere on the linuxbios website they spoke of the difficulties in porting it to laptops:

http://linuxbios.org/Laptop

Primarilly because most laptops, including IBM's, are not actually made by the company that sells them, and so there are many undocumented aspects. Which is something I never knew before.
seems i overlooked that page, tnx.
i was hoping you have additional information on it.

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: boot time

#10 Post by jdhurst » Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:01 am

dmitrio wrote:<snip>
Front page http://linuxbios.org/Welcome_to_LinuxBIOS give this timing
Fast boot times (3 seconds from power-on to Linux console)
Let us know if you make it work. Never, in 40 years, have I seen any computer of any kind of any make of any OS get to full running from a cold start 3 seconds after pushing the ON switch. However, I am prepared to keep an open mind. ... JDH

smugiri
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:29 pm
Location: Mississauga, ON
Contact:

Re: boot time

#11 Post by smugiri » Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:14 am

jdhurst wrote:
dmitrio wrote:<snip>
Front page http://linuxbios.org/Welcome_to_LinuxBIOS give this timing
Let us know if you make it work. Never, in 40 years, have I seen any computer of any kind of any make of any OS get to full running from a cold start 3 seconds after pushing the ON switch. However, I am prepared to keep an open mind. ... JDH
OK. Watch this space ... they have it down to about 10 secs now as you can see in this video and in this one.
Steve

Robbyrobot
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

#12 Post by Robbyrobot » Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:07 am

Never, in 40 years, have I seen any computer of any kind of any make of any OS get to full running from a cold start 3 seconds after pushing the ON switch.
I have. Atari ST with the OS in an EPROM. :lol:

hseaver
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Oshkosh, WI

#13 Post by hseaver » Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:13 pm

Well, there certainly is hope that a linuxbios might be forthcoming for the 600x --- at least the work is almost done on it's major chipsets, like the 440bX -- 82443BX and 82371AB bridges, etc.

http://linuxbios.org/Supported_Chipsets_and_Devices
A31 1.6GHZ 1GB
560x 266mhz 96mb
600x 500mhz 589mb

whizkid
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1555
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Contact:

Re: boot time

#14 Post by whizkid » Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:13 pm

jdhurst wrote:Never, in 40 years, have I seen any computer of any kind of any make of any OS get to full running from a cold start 3 seconds after pushing the ON switch. However, I am prepared to keep an open mind. ... JDH
Put one of these http://dreher.net/?s=projects/CFforAppl ... I/main.php in your Apple II and watch it boot from a CF card in about two seconds.
Machine-Project: 750P, 600X, T42, T60, T400, X1 Carbon Touch

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#15 Post by jdhurst » Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:30 pm

If I had to live on an Atari or on an Apple IIe, I would starve. The last Apple IIe I used would barely run let alone start in seconds.

The hype over fast starting machines is much overblown in my opinion. Anyone who lives only to start a computer has too little to do. My computer is up and running fast and smooth by the time my briefcase is open, my coffee is open and I have arranged my desk. Saving 3 minutes from time I have to invest anyway is not "saving" in an real sense.

If we want to continue the discussion, I will phrase it this way: Never in 40 years have I seen a computer worthy of using and worthy to do honest work start from a cold start in 15 seconds or less. I *was* looking for some realism, but perhaps that is not to be. ... JDH

hseaver
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:12 am
Location: Oshkosh, WI

#16 Post by hseaver » Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:03 pm

jdhurst wrote: If we want to continue the discussion, I will phrase it this way: Never in 40 years have I seen a computer worthy of using and worthy to do honest work start from a cold start in 15 seconds or less. I *was* looking for some realism, but perhaps that is not to be. ... JDH
Well, i f you look at the list of motherboards on the linuxbios site that are already working with it, you'll find plenty of fully functioning, very useful, modern computers to choose from. But there's a whole lot more too it than just being able to boot quickly. Getting rid of all the funky proprietary bios is the man idea.
And I'd love to have a laptop that would fully boot in five seconds -- it would save oodles of battery time, because it would also mean that I wouldn't hesitate to shut it down a lot more than I do.
A31 1.6GHZ 1GB
560x 266mhz 96mb
600x 500mhz 589mb

dmitrio
Freshman Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:52 am
Location: MumbaUmba, MaltaPalta
Contact:

solid computer

#17 Post by dmitrio » Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:54 pm

additional point to keep in mind
hardware, that is at the begining have proper initialization, and fully functional state at the end of the initialization would be easy to test. And that eliminate process of "double initialization" when BIOS by itself check on the hardware, and then OS on top go through initialization.

and second,
in some cases you even don't need to load OS to do certain tasks.
such as playback DVD (i believe, some laptops have this ability)
and that can be fully customized - think about security ...

Robbyrobot
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

#18 Post by Robbyrobot » Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:46 am

Never in 40 years have I seen a computer worthy of using and worthy to do honest work start from a cold start in 15 seconds or less.
Depends on how you define "worthy of using" and "honest work". I used an Atari ST from 1987-1991 for technical translation work that brought in more income than I had previously earned as an applications research chemist in industry, and it was quite an improvement over the typewriter I had previously used. It was also quite an improvement over the IBM systems available at the time, which I also looked at but rejected because of the inflated prices and the poor display. I only switched to a PC in 1991, after I had seen and become convinced of the advantages of WordPerfect 5.1 DOS.

I agree that the startup time is not really the "killer feature" of a computer, but that wasn't the claim up to now.
I *was* looking for some realism, but perhaps that is not to be. ...
"Realism" is a flexible thing and depends on how you define it. Everyone has his own ideas about that.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad Legacy Hardware”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests