precip9 wrote:You must have a Kill-A-Watt:
http://www.p3international.com/products/p4400.html
What does it tell you?
In a like situation, I would consider partitioning the computer tasks between the laptop and a tablet. Use the laptop only when the task demands it. An Android tablet can be paired with mouse and keyboard. Office suites exist. When not charging, power consumption of a 10" tablet is around 3 watts.
Have the Kill-A-Watt; don't have the T420 and T430.
For personal sanity, compatibility with the world that pays the bills and the need to actually type and compose volumes, this will be a Microsoft-only Thinkpad environment, regardless of the potential and even occasionally superior merits of Linux and Cupertino. Thanks for the suggestions.
We actually were
given a brand-new MBP, which addressed the power consumption issue (averaging 15 W/H) - but after a couple days of the Jobs Experience, we sent it back, as there was temptation to put it on the chopping block and play Paul Bunyan, or re-enact the final "PC LOAD Letter" scene from Office Space.
dr_st wrote:First, practicality. I imagine that your retreat needs to power a lot of stuff which is way more hungry than a laptop. Probably by like two orders of magnitude. to power consumption measurements.
A reasonable assumption, but not applicable in this case. The refrigerator, stove and heaters run on propane, and share a separate hard-wired battery system with the tiny demand water-pump. There is no TV, satellite, coffee maker, microwave, toaster, space heater, air conditioning or laser printer.
Interior lighting is minimalist LED, and the structure is not only extremely well-insulated, it is designed to maximize natural heating and cooling.
The laptop is the sole power hog.
The overriding vote was cast yesterday, in favor of "order now, and worry about power later", so we're going with a T530. If the power system can't keep up, we'll be augmenting the battery bank ($$$).
I'm planning to buy a second 9-cell battery, which I intend to charge externally.
Am I correct to infer that the battery "security" chip only affects acceptance in the T530, not the charging mechanism?