x240 vs x220
Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:34 am
Received my x240 a few days ago, core i5 4300u (2.9ghz max) 4gb ram, and i put in a samsung 830ssd.
My old x220, with a core i5 2520m (3.2ghz max) 8gb ram, and now running an intel ssd,
I noticed chrome browser opens and loads a touch faster on the x220 in a side by side comparison. Then i noticed you tube videos will also load and play slightly faster on the x220. This lead me to run a benchmark on the two machines using passmark 8.0.
The x240 has a slightly better overall score, but the individual scores, the x220 is faster in everything except 3d graphics.
I would have preferred lenovo kept the x220 form factor and installed a full power haswell chip. The fn keys are difficult to use and i much preferred having real buttons to use with the trackpoint. i dont really notice the difference in weight (.2lbs). The thinner chasis is nice but at the expense of major performance and expansion limitations... oh well.
My old x220, with a core i5 2520m (3.2ghz max) 8gb ram, and now running an intel ssd,
I noticed chrome browser opens and loads a touch faster on the x220 in a side by side comparison. Then i noticed you tube videos will also load and play slightly faster on the x220. This lead me to run a benchmark on the two machines using passmark 8.0.
The x240 has a slightly better overall score, but the individual scores, the x220 is faster in everything except 3d graphics.
I would have preferred lenovo kept the x220 form factor and installed a full power haswell chip. The fn keys are difficult to use and i much preferred having real buttons to use with the trackpoint. i dont really notice the difference in weight (.2lbs). The thinner chasis is nice but at the expense of major performance and expansion limitations... oh well.