X270 had a very good review (4 stars out of 5), and was praised for its potential almost-24-hours max battery life.
However, it did not get the Editor's Choice status.
www.pcmag.com/review/352469/lenovo-thin ... arbon-2017
That honor went to X1 Carbon (Generation 5), which got the Editor's Choice award
Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
Review on X270
Review on X270
Daily Driver: (X1E3) X1 Extreme 3rd Gen | mobile broadband (WWAN)
Current Thinkpads: X1E3 | X1E1 | X1C10 | X1C9 | X1C4 | X1C3 | X230
Retired Thinkpads: X250 | T410 | T42 | 560 (circa 1996)
Current Thinkpads: X1E3 | X1E1 | X1C10 | X1C9 | X1C4 | X1C3 | X230
Retired Thinkpads: X250 | T410 | T42 | 560 (circa 1996)
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:25 am
- Location: N. Bellmore, ny
Re: Review on X270
According to the rating, i can say the reviewer is a mac loving trackpad user. Atmost i would give it 2 stars.
Sent from my E6553 using Tapatalk
Sent from my E6553 using Tapatalk
Thinkpad4by3's Law of the Universe.
The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.
The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 1 Replies
- 1087 Views
-
Last post by dr_st
Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:42 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests