My last laptop was an old T42. You know how it is..lid latches, proper Thinkpad keyboard, mass of approximately two or three lesser laptops. It was my only computer for a long time, and I absolutely loved that thing. Unfortunately it died right around the time I built a desktop system (of, I suspect, a lifted GPU chip caused by my ignorantly moving the laptop around by the front thirds of the case *cough*) and I never got around to pulling the mainboard and figuring out what went wrong.
Rather than doing so now and dealing with its dinosaur-era Pentium M, I figured it'd be better to get something modernish that retains the bulletproofness I fondly remember.
I looked at Lenovo's modern offerings, and found myself thoroughly unimpressed with what look to be ugly, generic "business" laptops with chiclet keyboards and more cost-cutting measures in place than you can shake a stick at. Which led to me looking at the biggest, meanest not-modern Thinkpad I could find...which in turn led me to the W530.
I understand that the w530 (and T530 aside from the graphics I suppose)
* ships with a chiclet keyboard, but can be easily converted to a more classic board
* can be freely swapped between HD++ and FHD TN panels, but needs some extra steps to convert to IPS if I wish
* has a fairly wide range of processor upgrades, up to a very beefy i7
* can have a reasonably powerful quadro 2000m that might or might not be fully Win10 compatible (doesn't bother me so much, used to Win7 anyway)
* is the last Thinkpad to have a lid latch
* is the last Thinkpad to have quite so much of a "almost more likely to damage pavement as it is to receive damage in a fall" build quality
* is the last Thinkpad to have an ultrabay that isn't a "cleverly" disguised fixed expansion slot
...there's more I'm sure I missed, just what came off the top of my head.
So, thread title? I don't have my heart dead-set on this particular model, and am open to alternatives. Also open to being corrected on any of the above, it's entirely possible I got something wrong.
The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.
Battery rebuild for increased capacity and to make sure I have good cells in it. It looks like the w530's 9-cell has something like 2800-2900mah cells in it; 18650s can get a bit better than that, and I've read the controller will adjust to bigger ones to a certain extent. Assuming I don't trip their silly DRM doing it.
Not an immediate worry, though, unless I get a laptop with an already-bad battery. More of a rainy-day project.
Some of my work involves showing other people stuff, it would be nice to have the widest viewing angle possible. I've looked at reviews, though, and the TN panel's angles do look adequate.
IPS also has better color reproduction and contrast.
But again...not an immediate worry. The stock TN panels look like they'll serve fine, certainly good enough for work and videos.
How resistant is the W530 chassis to flexing and being improperly lifted (e.g. by the corners), and are there any known issues with the mainboard being damaged if it does flex? I plan on being a bit more careful than I was with my T42, but it would be good to know in advance if it's more resilient in that regard anyway.
- Senior Member
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 11:21 pm
- Location: Pardubice, Czech Republic
- Senior Member
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:13 pm
- Location: kingston, ontario, Canada
I rather look at W540 for better USB 3.0 support over Ivy Bridge type W530 and T530 due to early USB 3.0 not refined enough. I know this because I had Haswell and Broadwell generation notebooks and USB 3.0 was much faster. Also processors is more clocked higher than Ivy bridge.
- Similar Topics
- Last post
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests