Attended vs unattended installation (windows server 2003)

Operating System, Common Application & ThinkPad Utilities Questions...
Post Reply
Message
Author
NS
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Singapore.. a tropical country..

Attended vs unattended installation (windows server 2003)

#1 Post by NS » Fri May 26, 2006 10:09 pm

I am going to install Windows Server 2003 in my R52 TP for my school work.

May i know what are the benefits of attended installation and the potential problems with attended installation? Same goes for unattended installation. I am stuck at these options. All suggestions are welcome. Should i choose for unattended installation or attended installation? Thanks.

GuoXing
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 11:32 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:

#2 Post by GuoXing » Sat May 27, 2006 5:00 am

Attended installation:

Benefits:
1) It takes the least amount of preparation
2) As long as you have a computer that suits the OS requirements and a copy of the server 2003 CD, you can start the installation
3) Same type of installation method as Windows XP and 2000

Potential Problems:
1) Time consuming
2) You need to sit down and stare at the computer and wait for the next prompt.

Unattended installation:

Benefit:
1) Saves time

Potential Problem:
1) A single typo can cause error
Tan Guo Xing
Transnote/R52/ Z60t/ T60/

Account disabled on user\'s request

BruisedQuasar
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:12 am
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan

#3 Post by BruisedQuasar » Sat May 27, 2006 5:36 pm

Can you run your existing Windows 2000 \XP software on Server 2003, or do you need Server 2003 ready versions?

Just curious because Vista is built on Server 2003, not on Win NT


--Bruised
The More I Learn, the Less I Think I Know
The Less I Think I Know, the More I Learn
I'M... Still Learning
--Bruised

GuoXing
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 11:32 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:

#4 Post by GuoXing » Sat May 27, 2006 10:45 pm

NS (Koh B H) is using the 3 months trial version for his school work. So what he wants here is to install 2003 and also can see his XP. He is the school DNS server student manager. He knows how to install but he needs to know the difference between attended and unattended software installation.

*NS, no offence here*
Tan Guo Xing
Transnote/R52/ Z60t/ T60/

Account disabled on user\'s request

XCoalMiner
Sophomore Member
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 11:01 am
Location: SE PA (USA)

#5 Post by XCoalMiner » Sun May 28, 2006 9:51 pm

Unattended installations are primarily intended to make it less labor intensive and also make it consistent to do mass deployments on a large scale, such as in large corporations or organizations.

You're doing it on a single laptop. That, and if you've never installed Windows Server 2003 before, then do it interactively the the first few times. After you see how it works, then do it unattended. I've installed it several times recently on VMWare images on laptops, it takes less than an hour to complete.

More information here: http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsSe ... x?mfr=true - see the section on creating an Answer File/Setup Settings for Unattended Installation.

NS
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Singapore.. a tropical country..

#6 Post by NS » Tue May 30, 2006 12:38 am

^^Thanks. I am done with the installation 3 hours ago. I used the attended installation. I sit down and watched it download and finally it is over. VMWare image is faster. Can pause and play. Thanks for the suggestions.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Windows OS (Versions prior to Windows 7)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests