Update connector hanging at 66%?

Operating System, Common Application & ThinkPad Utilities Questions...
Post Reply
Message
Author
CoolRunnings
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:29 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

Update connector hanging at 66%?

#1 Post by CoolRunnings » Sat Feb 05, 2005 7:06 pm

I've been trying to get the update connector working for the last few days off and on and it keeps hanging at 66% and going no further... This is a clean installation and it has done this from day one. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling it but to no avail. Any suggestions?

Sasha
Freshman Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: White Plains, NY
Contact:

Initially....

#2 Post by Sasha » Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:22 pm

..I thought that it was hanging up too.....but if I kept it open, it completed the update process in a couple of minutes....this is when it checks for the updates......

And when it has to download, the same thing happens...looks like it has hung up at 66%, 75% and 93%...but give it time and it completes the process....

I have a clean install on my machine too....

HTH

Sasha
ThinkPad W700ds 2757CTO, ThinkPad T42p 2373HVU, MCSa and my EOS 40D - My new loves! ;-)

K. Eng
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1946
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:10 am
Location: Pennsylvania, United States

#3 Post by K. Eng » Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:27 pm

I would avoid the update connector. When I bought my ThinkPad it was slow and unreliable, and things haven't changed much in the past two years.

I would use the driver matrix:

http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site. ... PAD-MATRIX

Download the packages you want, extract them, and then use the ThinkPad Software Installer to install them. This has worked well for me and is far less aggrevating than watching the update connector stall at 66% for the nth time.
Homebuilt PC: AMD Athlon XP (Barton) @ 1.47 GHz; nForce2 Ultra; 1GB RAM; 80GB HDD @ 7200RPM; ATI Radeon 9600; Integrated everything else!

CoolRunnings
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:29 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

#4 Post by CoolRunnings » Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:41 pm

Yeah, over 20 minutes at 66% shouldn't be normal... Java - compile once, crash everywhere. :P

K. Eng
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1946
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:10 am
Location: Pennsylvania, United States

#5 Post by K. Eng » Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:14 pm

ROFL :D

It's been 5 years since I've written anything in Java (the last program I wrote in Java was some software that was supposed to find the optimal path between nodes on a geometric plane - airport routing type problem).

My biggest complaint was "compile once, run slow everywhere." The penalty for the virtual machine is much less today, but on UltraSparc II/Solaris and Pentium III/Windows NT4 platforms performance was abysmal.
CoolRunnings wrote: Java - compile once, crash everywhere. :P
Homebuilt PC: AMD Athlon XP (Barton) @ 1.47 GHz; nForce2 Ultra; 1GB RAM; 80GB HDD @ 7200RPM; ATI Radeon 9600; Integrated everything else!

CoolRunnings
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:29 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Contact:

#6 Post by CoolRunnings » Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:21 pm

Ha ha! Performance may be better but it's STILL sad... I used to use this program called "Arachnophilia" as my main text editor for websites. Then the author went nuts and put the whole thing in Java. I refuse to use it anymore because of that. It's slow and cludgy now. :(

selvan777
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 507
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:41 am
Location: Folsom, CA, US
Contact:

#7 Post by selvan777 » Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:20 pm

Even though I've used it successfully, I don't depend on it. It's a piece of junk.
T23 2647-NU8 (retired X20)
XP Pro SP3
Firefox

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Windows OS (Versions prior to Windows 7)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests