is Atheros A/B/G not fully compatible?

Solaris, RedHat, FreeBSD and the like
Post Reply
Message
Author
benplaut
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:20 pm
Contact:

is Atheros A/B/G not fully compatible?

#1 Post by benplaut » Sun May 15, 2005 5:11 pm

i am finding that the Atheros A/B/G II card that i shelled out alot of $$$ for might not be fully linux compatible! it seems to not be able to scan for networks, and the only way i can get it to work is using the cr*ppy Gnome network outlet (that means manually entering the essid and key... every time i reboot...)

anyone else having problems?

i am using ubuntu- are some other distros working? :?

confused :oops:
--<<(({{[[Ben Plaut]]}}))>>--

If the only tool you have is a hammer,
Every problem begins to look like a nail

runixd
Freshman Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:09 pm
Location: London, UK

#2 Post by runixd » Mon May 16, 2005 8:10 am

something is wrong, you should be scanning just fine,
"iwconfig ath0 scan" shows nothing ?

Edward Mendelson
**SENIOR** Member
**SENIOR** Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:11 am

#3 Post by Edward Mendelson » Mon May 16, 2005 8:40 am

The commands you want to use may be these:

ifconfig ath0 up
iwlist ath0 scan

Notice that the second command begins iwlist, not ifconfig or iwconfig.

The MadWifi drivers for the Atheros chip are still what's politely called a work-in-progress, but you shouldn't have to enter the ESSID by hand during bootup, but you may want to consider adding the ESSID etc to your /etc/network/interfaces file, something like this:

iface ath0 inet static
address 192.168.1.101
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.1.0
wireless-essid MYWIRELESSESSID
wireless-key 010a4c3c3c

Obvously the wireless key is a made-up example, and so are the addresses, but you get the idea.

Also, if you create a Location for your setup, you probably won't need to bother with the manual setting in the /etc/network/interfaces card, but I can't confirm this.

runixd
Freshman Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:09 pm
Location: London, UK

#4 Post by runixd » Mon May 16, 2005 1:27 pm

well, MadWifi been working for me for 2 years without problems, maybe in the beginning only. Having to enter ESSID is not something to be afraid of, I, for one, have to enter MAC of my router, otherwise a no go and haven't tracked the problem.

Before putting stuff into /etc/network/interfaces, its a good idea to test settings first, ifup/ifdown may be hard to debug.

so you would:

iwconfigath0 essid SOME_ESSID mode managed rate auto enc KEY ap any

and assuming your router serves as dhcpd

dhclient ath0
you can also scan for surround area
iwlist ath0 scan

man iwconfig will list you the options you can give and iwlist ath0 scan will provide all you need about AP to connect to.
When it works, follow Edward and put it in interfaces.

benplaut
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:20 pm
Contact:

#5 Post by benplaut » Mon May 16, 2005 4:34 pm

i have tried all of the commands above, and have still had no success...

i have been at constant battle with wireless for about 2 months now :cry:
--<<(({{[[Ben Plaut]]}}))>>--

If the only tool you have is a hammer,
Every problem begins to look like a nail

Edward Mendelson
**SENIOR** Member
**SENIOR** Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:11 am

#6 Post by Edward Mendelson » Mon May 16, 2005 5:03 pm

Bill,

If you can connect once with the Gnome applet, you should be able to connect all the time by entering the proper info in the interfaces file.

I haven't tried SuSE Linux 9.3, but wireless in 9.2 certainly worked out of the box - roaming wasn't well-supported, but it was possible to get things to work.

Edward Mendelson

benplaut
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:20 pm
Contact:

#7 Post by benplaut » Tue May 17, 2005 12:22 am

Edward Mendelson wrote:Bill,

If you can connect once with the Gnome applet, you should be able to connect all the time by entering the proper info in the interfaces file.

I haven't tried SuSE Linux 9.3, but wireless in 9.2 certainly worked out of the box - roaming wasn't well-supported, but it was possible to get things to work.

Edward Mendelson
it works OK in all the live distros i tried... but ubuntu killed it :evil:
--<<(({{[[Ben Plaut]]}}))>>--

If the only tool you have is a hammer,
Every problem begins to look like a nail

runixd
Freshman Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:09 pm
Location: London, UK

#8 Post by runixd » Tue May 17, 2005 7:06 am

it probably just missconfigured it, but without any debugging info its very hard to help you any further.

Edward Mendelson
**SENIOR** Member
**SENIOR** Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:11 am

#9 Post by Edward Mendelson » Tue May 17, 2005 8:50 am

Have you at least *tried* the technique of entering the data into /etc/network/interfaces? Works perfectly here. And if you've installed the program "resolvconf" (that's the separate downloadable program, NOT the resolv.conf file which is a very different thing), then uninstall it.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Linux Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests