Share folder between Ubuntu and XP home

Solaris, RedHat, FreeBSD and the like
Post Reply
Message
Author
peahen
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 2:00 am
Location: Berkeley, CA

Share folder between Ubuntu and XP home

#1 Post by peahen » Wed May 23, 2007 1:22 pm

I have installed Ubuntu (Dapper) on my T60 and everything works fine. Sincie this is my first experience with dual systems, I was curious whether it's doable to share a folder between Linux and XP on the same machine.

I can see the Windows partition under Linux but it's read only. Any ideas? Thanks

MeaninglessNick
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

ntfs-3g

#2 Post by MeaninglessNick » Wed May 23, 2007 1:47 pm

look for

ntfs-3g ubuntu

on google.

I think it should be pretty straight forward. It was easy on debian, which is closely related.
X40, 570E (mothballed)

peahen
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 2:00 am
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: ntfs-3g

#3 Post by peahen » Wed May 23, 2007 2:17 pm

Many thanks. Will try it out tonight
MeaninglessNick wrote:look for

ntfs-3g ubuntu

on google.

I think it should be pretty straight forward. It was easy on debian, which is closely related.

kulivontot
Sophomore Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:01 pm

#4 Post by kulivontot » Wed May 23, 2007 3:05 pm

Just don't play around with the partition editors at all on your NTFS partitions. gParted ate a couple of my windows partitions when I tried to resize them.

Melvyn
Sophomore Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:21 am
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Contact:

#5 Post by Melvyn » Wed May 23, 2007 6:38 pm

Please correct me:
Does XP Home support NTFS?

As far as I know, it doesn't support ntfs, only fat32. So, there's no issue to access xp folder's from Linux.

Anyways, I recommend you create a small fat32 partition to store data shared among both OS.

Good luck
Lenovo ThinkPad T60p 8741-A11:
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 @2.16ghz, 3GB Ram, ATI Mobility FireGL V5250, HD 100gb @7200rpm
Old: ThinkPad T42 2373-M1U

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#6 Post by jdhurst » Wed May 23, 2007 7:13 pm

Melvyn wrote:Please correct me:
Does XP Home support NTFS?

As far as I know, it doesn't support ntfs, only fat32. <snip>
Good luck
No. Definitely No. Windows NT4, Windows 2000, Windows XP Home (yuccchh!) and Windows XP Pro *all* support NTFS. And no one, under any circumstances, use FAT with these systems. It is much too unreliable and prone to corruption. ... JDH

egibbs
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 896
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 6:05 am
Location: New Jersey

#7 Post by egibbs » Thu May 24, 2007 6:14 am

jdhurst wrote:And no one, under any circumstances, use FAT with these systems. It is much too unreliable and prone to corruption. ... JDH
Normally I'd agree with you JD, but he's wanting to share with Linux. IIRC Linux can read from NTFS just fine but writing to NTFS is risky and can corrupt the file system in rare cases.

The safest thing might be to create a small shared partition formatted as FAT that both Win and Lin can use to transfer files back and forth.

Ed Gibbs

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#8 Post by jdhurst » Thu May 24, 2007 7:02 am

@egibbs - that is handy to know.

What I prefer to do in this case is run Linux as a virtual machine, and then I just network the two machines. Corruption is not a problem in this case, and files can be shared and moved easily. Not everyone likes this method, however.
... JDH

Melvyn
Sophomore Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:21 am
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Contact:

#9 Post by Melvyn » Thu May 24, 2007 8:18 am

jdhurst wrote:No. Definitely No. Windows NT4, Windows 2000, Windows XP Home (yuccchh!) and Windows XP Pro *all* support NTFS. And no one, under any circumstances, use FAT with these systems. It is much too unreliable and prone to corruption. ... JDH
Well, well, I know xphome can access, read, write and execute over fat32. I've read that xphome lost some xppro features like ntfs.

I don't use xphome. Never installed it. I've seen several OEM machines with xp home preinstalled and all them use fat32.

By the way, I don't recomend FAT too.
Lenovo ThinkPad T60p 8741-A11:
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 @2.16ghz, 3GB Ram, ATI Mobility FireGL V5250, HD 100gb @7200rpm
Old: ThinkPad T42 2373-M1U

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#10 Post by jdhurst » Thu May 24, 2007 12:03 pm

Melvyn wrote:<snip>
Well, well, I know xphome can access, read, write and execute over fat32. I've read that xphome lost some xppro features like ntfs.

I don't use xphome. Never installed it. I've seen several OEM machines with xp home preinstalled and all them use fat32.

By the way, I don't recomend FAT too.
The post I responded to suggested XP Home *cannot* use NTFS. That is not true.

Any of the NTFS systems, however, *can* use FAT, but it is not recommended.

E Gibbs clarification for a small interchange partition is fine, but in general, NTFS is best.
... JDH

MeaninglessNick
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

NTFS risky on linux

#11 Post by MeaninglessNick » Thu May 24, 2007 3:02 pm

Obviously you have to make up your own mind whether to believe it, but the ntfs-3g project claims to be much safer than the old ntfs code. See their their web page for more information.

Your milage may vary, and if it eats your cat, don't blame me. Always have a backup (of your files anyway, if not your cat).
X40, 570E (mothballed)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Linux Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest