best nvidia-based thinkpad

Solaris, RedHat, FreeBSD and the like
Post Reply
Message
Author
metacolo
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:49 am

best nvidia-based thinkpad

#1 Post by metacolo » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:21 pm

Since it looks like the T500/W500 will be ATI or intel discrete, I was wondering what the best T43p replacement option will be for the next year. I've never had good luck with ATI drivers under linux, and I don't think intel integrated graphics will meet my performance requirements for a desktop replacement.

Right now, the best option seems to be a T61p, although LED backlight, S-IPS or otherwise better panel, and 8GB RAM would be a lot better for a machine.

Second best seems to be giving up on "desktop replacement" and just getting an X300 (X500?) or tablet, and spending more time at my desk.

Is there anything else worth considering? Have ATI drivers actually gotten functional? The main reason I want to replace my T43p is the glitching often caused by Xgl/ATI fglrx/beryl; the main reason I don't is the lovely panel.

Troels
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

#2 Post by Troels » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:46 pm

Hello,
Well, the later fglrx (now catalyst for linux) features AIGLX support, which is a huge step forward. However, there are still glitches.

Another good thing is that AMD is releasing R5xx, R6xx, R7xx register information, and a OSS driver is under heavy development at the time. 2D i'd say is nothing less than completely stable. Some 3D is implemented as well, but not sure how it progresses right now.
Check out the Phoronix forums mainly: http://www.phoronix.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=43

It all now seems most of a mess, but it is due to this:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a ... bios&num=1

or in more detail this:

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a ... onhd&num=1

The two driver models will likely merge sooner or later.
So, in my opinion the ATi side will be the most exciting side for a long time to come. I don't know what nVidia's status is, but i have heard that they are more stable than fglrx/catalyst for linux, but that is all i can claim, since i have no first hand experience. So wait until someone with an nVidia GPU chimes in

qviri
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

#3 Post by qviri » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:40 pm

Thoughts:

although I am by no means a power user, the V5200 in my T60p seems to play very nicely with the latest Ubuntu, including the flashy cube/wobbly windows/win-tab effects.

To get 8 GB (more than 3 GB, in fact), you will need T61/R61/X61 or later. To get non-TN panels, at the present time you need T60 or older. So far there has been no indication that non-TN panels will be offered again in the future. I don't know about LED backlight beyond the fact that current (old) models with IPS screens don't have them.

If you don't need the portability that much, a desktop with an MVA/IPS LCD seems like a good way out of these contradictions.
X220/IPS, T60p/IPS
Nothing endures but change

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15734
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

#4 Post by ajkula66 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:14 am

Words "ThinkPad" and "nVidia" should not be found in the same sentence...it has never worked well, and still doesn't.

BTW, nothing against nVidia per se. But not on ThinkPads.

Get used to ATi, Linux support will eventually get where it needs to be. It's definitely gone a long way over the last several years.

My $0.02 only...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: R61

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

slagmi
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:25 am
Location: Ohio
Contact:

#5 Post by slagmi » Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:51 am

surprisingly, I've been more than pleased with the Nvidia Fx570m/256 in my T61P in both linux and vista

runs everything I want to run very well at the native 1680x1050 resolution, and the vista drivers finally appear to be maturing, as evidenced by the relative lack of glitches and performance issues.

all in all regarding nvidia/vista things are much better that a year ago. Regarding Linux, every 'Live' distro I've tried was able to load suitable drivers successfully, with minimal additional work

regarding thinkpad/nvidia that's a different story, others here probably can recall that history better than me, I never owned a nVidia video based thinkpad before this one.

only one issue noted- predesktop screens (not the BIOS/EFI, but rather screens such as a dismounted chkdsk or defrag) do not display at all. curiously, these screens do get displayed to an external monitor. I haven't reloaded, so I don't know if this affects windows setup or the rr environment. I'm pretty sure it will not affect Vista setup. Weird issue though, and one that many users would never even notice.

dickeywang
Freshman Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:33 am

#6 Post by dickeywang » Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:07 am

Well, I still see Nvidia is providing a better Linux driver than AMD/ATI, and my Quadro FX 570M is working very well under Ubuntu Hardy(suspend, hibernate, compiz, awn). However I admit that it seems AMD/ATI is catching up and considering the recent open source effort AMD/ATI did, I would recommend ATI based Thinkpad instead of Nvidia based ones.
T60 (2007-66U): upgraded to C2D T7400, 2GB DDR2-667, Hitachi Travelstar 5k250, 14" SXGA+, ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 (sold).
T61 (8891-CTO): C2D T7300, 4GB DDR2-667, Hitachi Travelstar 5k250, 14" SXGA+, Nvidia Quadro FX 570M (128MB).

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Linux Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests