WANT TO TRY BUT NEW TO LINUX?
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:15 pm
First, I am no Linux grand master. I've been a Linux user for six years now and I like to download and look over different Linux distros.
The Ubuntu project is focused on user friendliness. Many newbies start out with one of the Ubuntu family (Xubuntu is popular for example).
I play with Slax, [censored] Small Linux (DSL, which is dormant at this time), Suse, Fedora, the newer project xPud, and many others.
The distro I find is best all around for "try it out" newbies is a small distro called Puppy Linux. The Puppy project is strongly focused on compact size, speed of boot and speed of operation. It's very feasible for someone with DSL or Cable Internet to download and burn it to CD. It's very good for breathing new life into older computers, a second focus of the Puppy Project. Each time I am impressed all over again by a new version of Puppy, the next version impresses me all over again. A third focus is user friendly.
Puppy Linux 4.31, most recent version, remains small, auto loads itself into RAM memory, so long as you have 128MB or more RAM and runs from RAM. It is amazing how much of Puppy the project has managed to automate.
Users can now have Puppy install itself onto a USB Flash stick! I use 4.31 daily for surfing and general use. Yet, I have the entire distro, programs, & data installed onto a 2GB flash stick with plenty of room left to add programs, data, temp files.
I originally installed Puppy onto an 8GB stick but found that overkill, moved it to 2GB and installed the newest Knoppix to the 8GB stick.
If I were a newbie, I would skip [censored] Small Linux. Its been dormant about two years now. I think it will prove abandoned. I'd go right to Puppy,
a much smaller user friendly distro (but less user friendly than Puppy or Ubuntu) is xPud. It really is ready to use in under 10 seconds even on an old Pentium III Compaq. The downside of starting out with Ubuntu is it is big. It takes much longer than Puppy to boot up, needs more RAM and you get irritating delays as it uses the Live CD like a hard drive. In my opinion, Ubuntu is one of the bloated Linux Distros. Puppy is more user friendly minus the bloat many Linux distros have been gaining, trying to ape Microsoft Windows desktop.
NOTE: Puppy is designed to work fast from a CD. For older PCs that cannot boot from USB devices, Puppy on CD is fine so long as the PC has over 128MB usable RAM. For pre-Pentium IV PCs, users say older pre Puppy 4 versions are better.
--Bruised
The Ubuntu project is focused on user friendliness. Many newbies start out with one of the Ubuntu family (Xubuntu is popular for example).
I play with Slax, [censored] Small Linux (DSL, which is dormant at this time), Suse, Fedora, the newer project xPud, and many others.
The distro I find is best all around for "try it out" newbies is a small distro called Puppy Linux. The Puppy project is strongly focused on compact size, speed of boot and speed of operation. It's very feasible for someone with DSL or Cable Internet to download and burn it to CD. It's very good for breathing new life into older computers, a second focus of the Puppy Project. Each time I am impressed all over again by a new version of Puppy, the next version impresses me all over again. A third focus is user friendly.
Puppy Linux 4.31, most recent version, remains small, auto loads itself into RAM memory, so long as you have 128MB or more RAM and runs from RAM. It is amazing how much of Puppy the project has managed to automate.
Users can now have Puppy install itself onto a USB Flash stick! I use 4.31 daily for surfing and general use. Yet, I have the entire distro, programs, & data installed onto a 2GB flash stick with plenty of room left to add programs, data, temp files.
I originally installed Puppy onto an 8GB stick but found that overkill, moved it to 2GB and installed the newest Knoppix to the 8GB stick.
If I were a newbie, I would skip [censored] Small Linux. Its been dormant about two years now. I think it will prove abandoned. I'd go right to Puppy,
a much smaller user friendly distro (but less user friendly than Puppy or Ubuntu) is xPud. It really is ready to use in under 10 seconds even on an old Pentium III Compaq. The downside of starting out with Ubuntu is it is big. It takes much longer than Puppy to boot up, needs more RAM and you get irritating delays as it uses the Live CD like a hard drive. In my opinion, Ubuntu is one of the bloated Linux Distros. Puppy is more user friendly minus the bloat many Linux distros have been gaining, trying to ape Microsoft Windows desktop.
NOTE: Puppy is designed to work fast from a CD. For older PCs that cannot boot from USB devices, Puppy on CD is fine so long as the PC has over 128MB usable RAM. For pre-Pentium IV PCs, users say older pre Puppy 4 versions are better.
--Bruised