Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
-
shooteagle
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
- Location: Port Chester, NY
i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
the price difference is $50. The one game i probably play is diablo 3 otherwise mainly internet, MS word, MS excel, Quicken, some home video playing. Is this worth it/
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
I would say no.
ThinkPad L14 - 2.1GHz Ryzen 4650U | 16GB | 256GB | 14" FHD | Win11P
ProBook 470 G5 - 1.6GHz Core i5 | 16GB | 2.2TB | 17" FHD | Mint
ProBook 470 G5 - 1.6GHz Core i5 | 16GB | 2.2TB | 17" FHD | Mint
-
Cigarguy
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:08 pm
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
Slight speed bump. For games I'd look into upgrading the GPU vs CPU and/or an aftermarket SSD.
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
How do you "upgrade" the GPU on an X201T or an X230T?
First Thinkpad 755CX in 1995. First IBM: PC 1982 8088 w 64K RAM, dual floppy. Currently in use:
X230T with Win8Pro x64, i7, 500gb ssd; W700 WUXGA RAID 1 Blu-Ray W7Pro x64, occasionally a T61p with Win7Pro x64
X230T with Win8Pro x64, i7, 500gb ssd; W700 WUXGA RAID 1 Blu-Ray W7Pro x64, occasionally a T61p with Win7Pro x64
-
Cigarguy
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1761
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:08 pm
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
If buying new then I'd "look" into being able to get a unit with an upgraded GPU. If not then I'm sure Lenovo can do it.....for a fee.
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
Unless I'm mistaken, the integrated Intel HD 4000 is the only video option available for the X230 / X230T, so if you need more juice you'd need to look into external options.
Thinkpad L14 gen 2 | AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850u | 64gb RAM | 1tb SK Hynix P31 Gold | Intel AX210
Desktop: AMD Threadripper 1950x | 64gb RAM | 512gb Samsung 970 Pro + 1tb Crucial SSD | Ubuntu 20.04 LTS | Dell S2721DGF
Previous Thinkpads: A21m, R40, X61, T410, T420, W520
Desktop: AMD Threadripper 1950x | 64gb RAM | 512gb Samsung 970 Pro + 1tb Crucial SSD | Ubuntu 20.04 LTS | Dell S2721DGF
Previous Thinkpads: A21m, R40, X61, T410, T420, W520
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
When I compared all the features based on the Intel specs site, the main difference I noticed was the 3210M does not support Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
This is important for fast operation of virtual machines when using VirtualBox or KVM (I use GNU/Linux).
Unless you plan on using that I doubt the $ is worth it. To me it was just another checklist item not to forget.
This is important for fast operation of virtual machines when using VirtualBox or KVM (I use GNU/Linux).
Unless you plan on using that I doubt the $ is worth it. To me it was just another checklist item not to forget.
-
Lockheed
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:16 am
- Location: France (most of the time)
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
Except it appears that neither VBox nor VMware support that as of yet.MagicFab wrote:When I compared all the features based on the Intel specs site, the main difference I noticed was the 3210M does not support Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
This is important for fast operation of virtual machines when using VirtualBox or KVM (I use GNU/Linux).
T420s - i7, 16GB RAM, Samsung 850 EVO + 1TB Hitachi 9.5mm, Nvidia, Oleh Bios.
W500 - C2D P9500, 8GB RAM, Samsung 830 SSD + 750GB Hitachi HDD, Intel+ATI GPU, bright WUXGA, FP-reader
Arch Linux, BTRFS+ZFS on LUKS
W500 - C2D P9500, 8GB RAM, Samsung 830 SSD + 750GB Hitachi HDD, Intel+ATI GPU, bright WUXGA, FP-reader
Arch Linux, BTRFS+ZFS on LUKS
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
I stand corrected.
I don't use VMware and I don't plan to use VB on this system, so yes, this matters only if you're going to use KVM for now. When and if VB (or VMWare) support this, it may be important to you. Here is the bug report for VB, BTW:
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/5252
I don't use VMware and I don't plan to use VB on this system, so yes, this matters only if you're going to use KVM for now. When and if VB (or VMWare) support this, it may be important to you. Here is the bug report for VB, BTW:
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/5252
Re: i5-3210M vs i5-3320M
VT-d allows you to pass hardware through to a VM. VMware server products support it, but their workstation and player do not. However, virtual box on linux has supported it for awhile. I was using it to connect my WiFi card directly to a VM back in February of this year. I have since switched to KVM.
http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.h ... assthrough
http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.h ... assthrough
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests






