Low resource malware scanners that does not require personal info to register?
-
thinkpadcollection
- Senior Member

- Posts: 540
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:13 pm
- Location: kingston, ontario, Canada
Low resource malware scanners that does not require personal info to register?
Topic asks all.
I use forticlient but it is real heavy on CPU if I push computer hard and it does not ask for personal info.
Cheers, thinkpadcollection.
I use forticlient but it is real heavy on CPU if I push computer hard and it does not ask for personal info.
Cheers, thinkpadcollection.
Re: Low resource malware scanners that does not require personal info to register?
Malwarebytes Free
Arch//Openbox R61//GNOME 3 X201i/X230 Tablet //Spectrwm T61/X61/X61 Debian 9/X32
Work - Win7/X220T BunsenLabs T43
Retired T60p/T60/X30/X31/X61S RIP T400/T21/X61T/X200T
Work - Win7/X220T BunsenLabs T43
Retired T60p/T60/X30/X31/X61S RIP T400/T21/X61T/X200T
-
tarvoke
- Junior Member

- Posts: 273
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:45 pm
- Location: Slightly Outside America
Re: Low resource malware scanners that does not require personal info to register?
definitely malwarebytes. although I don't think the free version does active work in the background, you'll need to manually scan files. I don't think the free version even does automated daily system checks or actively monitor memory/execution. pretty sure that in the past you needed the paid version for all those extra conveniences? regardless it's still a great application.
a surprisingly good product is MS Security Essentials (evolved from Windows Defender) - Win8 comes with it by default, but for Win7 you need to DL from microsoft and install yourself. it is a great anti-virus as well as anti-malware, actively scans memory, programs and downloads, etc., and is surprisingly lightweight.
(my previous favorite Avast has been, for years, increasingly turning into an awful heavyweight piece of adware, so I really have to thank whomever at MS...)
also consider something like sandboxie to run your web browser inside of (also your mail client, etc...)
or if you're already using chrome/chromium browser, I'm fairly sure it already operates in its own internal sandbox, which is pretty cool.
also also consider using something like noscript (firefox) or scriptsafe (chrome) to stop unnecessary/potentially-dangerous cross-site scripting. it's a bit of an annoyance starting out, to unblock your common/frequent/trusted websites, until it all works normally again, but once you do, surfing will be a lot safer. with the added bonus of hardly ever seeing ads again.
and consider ghostery (both firefox and chrome) as well. it mainly takes care of 3rd party ads / web-bugs / etc., but the very nature of that means it is also helping prevent cross-site attacks as well.
a surprisingly good product is MS Security Essentials (evolved from Windows Defender) - Win8 comes with it by default, but for Win7 you need to DL from microsoft and install yourself. it is a great anti-virus as well as anti-malware, actively scans memory, programs and downloads, etc., and is surprisingly lightweight.
(my previous favorite Avast has been, for years, increasingly turning into an awful heavyweight piece of adware, so I really have to thank whomever at MS...)
also consider something like sandboxie to run your web browser inside of (also your mail client, etc...)
or if you're already using chrome/chromium browser, I'm fairly sure it already operates in its own internal sandbox, which is pretty cool.
also also consider using something like noscript (firefox) or scriptsafe (chrome) to stop unnecessary/potentially-dangerous cross-site scripting. it's a bit of an annoyance starting out, to unblock your common/frequent/trusted websites, until it all works normally again, but once you do, surfing will be a lot safer. with the added bonus of hardly ever seeing ads again.
and consider ghostery (both firefox and chrome) as well. it mainly takes care of 3rd party ads / web-bugs / etc., but the very nature of that means it is also helping prevent cross-site attacks as well.
go away.
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15733
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: Low resource malware scanners that does not require personal info to register?
Agreed 1001%.tarvoke wrote:definitely malwarebytes. although I don't think the free version does active work in the background, you'll need to manually scan files. I don't think the free version even does automated daily system checks or actively monitor memory/execution. pretty sure that in the past you needed the paid version for all those extra conveniences? regardless it's still a great application.
The problem with MSE is that it fails miserably in most of the real world AV testing. Just throw it into any search engine and the results are...duh.a surprisingly good product is MS Security Essentials (evolved from Windows Defender) - Win8 comes with it by default, but for Win7 you need to DL from microsoft and install yourself. it is a great anti-virus as well as anti-malware, actively scans memory, programs and downloads, etc., and is surprisingly lightweight.
Once again agreed 1001%.and consider ghostery (both firefox and chrome) as well. it mainly takes care of 3rd party ads / web-bugs / etc., but the very nature of that means it is also helping prevent cross-site attacks as well.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
tarvoke
- Junior Member

- Posts: 273
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:45 pm
- Location: Slightly Outside America
Re: Low resource malware scanners that does not require personal info to register?
ouch! I had no ideaajkula66 wrote:The problem with MSE is that it fails miserably in most of the real world AV testing. Just throw it into any search engine and the results are...duh.
good thing then that I've finally been using x200t + lunix-mint as my daily workstation - best-beloved x61t now sits there, lid closed, doing nothing, aside from providing comfort
((and, yes, George, the glorious x220t from you is still "too nice for everyday"
go away.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Keyboard & Thinkpoint Inert On Bootup After Bad Malware Fighter DeInstall
by jimwg » Tue May 16, 2017 11:01 am » in ThinkPad R, A, G and Z Series - 4 Replies
- 454 Views
-
Last post by Thinkpad4by3
Tue May 16, 2017 4:09 pm
-
-
-
IBM Personal System 2 8550 50Z Processor upgrade
by ThinkPad560X » Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:58 am » in IBM or Lenovo Desktops/Workstations/ThinkStations only - 16 Replies
- 900 Views
-
Last post by ThinkPad560X
Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:38 am
-
-
-
Camera LED does not work? Make sure it's not taped over. :)
by dr_st » Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:00 pm » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 0 Replies
- 800 Views
-
Last post by dr_st
Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:00 pm
-
-
- 0 Replies
- 421 Views
-
Last post by vanaya
Sun May 07, 2017 11:08 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests



