W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

W500/510/520 and W700/710 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
fredsmith999
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:08 pm
Location: london, uk

W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#1 Post by fredsmith999 » Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:14 pm

I like the look of a quad core w510. Say a 720 or 820qm, 8gb ram.
How would performance compare to a typical new cheaper laptop with 4th or 5th gen i5 dual core?
I can't find newish benchmarks for it and the general cpu comparison doesn't look very promising.

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15734
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#2 Post by ajkula66 » Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:48 pm

Welcome to the forum!

W510 in QC guise still packs plenty of punch, but will run quite a bit warmer and have significantly worse battery life than newer systems.

What's the intended use for the system in the first place?
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: R61

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

fredsmith999
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:08 pm
Location: london, uk

Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#3 Post by fredsmith999 » Wed Apr 29, 2015 1:47 am

Thanks. Nothing enormously demanding, just regular use plus some coding, VMs, little bit of simulation.
But i am looking for a laptop that will sit on my desk 99% of the next 3 years so battery unimportant.
Nice to run lots of things at once: a vm open, workspaces, etc. Also i might need more power in the future (studying maths, actuarial, econ. etc.). For a mobile device i could manage on 2 cores but here, power is nice and why not?

W510 pretty cheap but w520 rather a lot more: but seems much more powerful on the benchmarks in reviews: 2720qm w520 can't DOUBLE 720qm w510 performance can it? Surely the gap not THAT big. But average passmark score of 2720qm systems, generally, IS double. Worth the money for future proofing?

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15734
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#4 Post by ajkula66 » Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:51 am

fredsmith999 wrote:Worth the money for future proofing?
I'd say "yes".

W520 runs SATA III in the main bay where W510 is still SATA II. The former also has the option of using the WWAN slot for a mSATA boot drive.

If you're going to run VMs a cool-running system would be preferred to prevent throttling, and in that respect W520 wins hands down as well.

My $0.02 only...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: R61

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

fredsmith999
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:08 pm
Location: london, uk

Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#5 Post by fredsmith999 » Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:27 am

Thanks, saving up for the w520, unless i find a cheap t520 first. With quad and discrete graphics would that be as good? (they have cheaper nvidia cards but looks good enough)

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15734
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#6 Post by ajkula66 » Wed Apr 29, 2015 7:48 am

fredsmith999 wrote:Thanks, saving up for the w520, unless i find a cheap t520 first. With quad and discrete graphics would that be as good? (they have cheaper nvidia cards but looks good enough)
Well, W520 with QC has 4 RAM slots where T520 only has two...so I'd go with a W, but that's your money to spend...or not.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: R61

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

QWERTY Andreas
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:40 am
Location: Copenhagen Denmark

Re: W510 quad: performance compared to new stuff

#7 Post by QWERTY Andreas » Fri May 01, 2015 12:41 am

Take a look at the numbers yourself: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core ... 034.0.html

It is not that "fast" anymore (but still usable for some time to come), and it generates quite alot of heat.
Thinkpad W500 (2.53 GHz P8700, 4 GB RAM, FireGL V5700, WUXGA)
Thinkpad T61F 14" (2.53 GHz QX9300, 6 GB RAM, Quadro FX570m 256 MB, SXGA). Advanced dock with AMD Radeon HD7750
Custom build ITX desktop (i5 4590, 8GB RAM, AMD R7 260X, custom watercooling)
Thinkpad 8, Fujitsu F-07C


FS: T61F

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad W500/510/520 and W7x0 Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests