Linux and Wireless Cards

Solaris, RedHat, FreeBSD and the like
Post Reply
Message
Author
fcgarcia
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Linux and Wireless Cards

#1 Post by fcgarcia » Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:02 pm

Already asked many times but I need simple answer. Cousin starting business with 10 employees. Going Open Source per my request (and can't afford 10 copies of XP and Office).

Will use laptops w/o builtin Wi-fi. Will use SuSe 9.2 but has Xandros, Yoper, and Novell Linux (SuSe 9) as alternatives. I have provided comparison list of popular Windows programs and their Open Source alternative.

Question: What Wireless (802.11g) cards should they buy for accessing their Wireless setup as well as Wi-Fi hotspots. These are not techie folks and could not compile "Hello World".

Thanks for "listening" and for your time.

FCG
Frank C. Garcia
fcgarcia@live.com

kevinh
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

#2 Post by kevinh » Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:30 pm

Since those machines are for a business, you might also consider CentOS 4 (www.centos.org), built from RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 source code--RHEL 4 in everything but name. CentOS 4 has pre-built modules already included for the Intel Pro 2100B and 2200BG wireless cards. Just copy the firmware to the proper directory, create the config files, and you are off. CentOS 4 with the Intel card runs great on my T42.

Kevin

AndreasMeier
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:26 pm

#3 Post by AndreasMeier » Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:40 pm

Take care of buying cards with wpa encryption !
I have good experience with the intel cards (centrino build-in) and an old netgear MA401 card. Both are working very well.
Regards,
Andreas

stgreek
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: Chalkida, GR
Contact:

#4 Post by stgreek » Sun Jun 12, 2005 6:30 am

Your best bet are cards that use an Orinoco/Lucent/Agere chipset (like an old netgear) or the cisco cards. The Orinoco/Lucent/Agere is essentially the same chipset, and was the first chipset that had fully open-source drivers, and therefore has been tested the most. As for Cisco, if you can get the Cisco Aironet 340/350 cards for cheap at ebay go for it, as they are pretty much guaranteed not to cause problems. Intel cards are OK, unless you want to use encryption, in which case it is a hit or miss case.

Hope this helps
Stavros

fcgarcia
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#5 Post by fcgarcia » Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:16 pm

Thank you all for your comments.

FCG
Frank C. Garcia
fcgarcia@live.com

gattler
User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:39 pm

atheros

#6 Post by gattler » Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:45 am

I have the chance to get an Atheros Wifi Card against the build-in Intel 2200 Wifi in my T42. What do you think is better/easier (for Linux) ?

gattler
User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:39 pm

any1

#7 Post by gattler » Thu Oct 20, 2005 9:46 am

anyone a clue?

dlichterman
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:09 pm

#8 Post by dlichterman » Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:25 pm

I have the DLink xtreme G stuff and it now works under Knoppix4.0!!!! It is a atheros based chipset as far as I can tell.

kgorilla
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:44 pm

Re: atheros

#9 Post by kgorilla » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:13 am

gattler wrote:I have the chance to get an Atheros Wifi Card against the build-in Intel 2200 Wifi in my T42. What do you think is better/easier (for Linux) ?
info about the 2200 and linux here.. http://thinkwiki.org/wiki/MiniPCI_slot

carbon_unit
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: South Central Iowa, USA

#10 Post by carbon_unit » Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:05 am

I am using Xandros 3.02 with an Intel 220bg and it works well. I use 256 bit WPA encryption at home and it works fine, The only problem is switching from an encrypted connection to an unencrypted connection requires a reboot. Switching to an encrypted connection works fine. Roaming using "any" for an SSID and no encryption works fine. It just picks up what ever signal is available.
T60 2623-D7U, 3 GB Ram.
Dual boot XP and Linux Mint.
Registered linux user #160145

Volker
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Contact:

#11 Post by Volker » Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:55 am

For the record, ipw2100 / ipw2200 are now in the official kernel, starting with version 2.6.14.
carbon_unit wrote:The only problem is switching from an encrypted connection to an unencrypted connection requires a reboot.
I've never seen that kind of bug. Are you sure that you properly disable encryption (iwconfig ethX key off)? You might want to try a newer version of the driver.

carbon_unit
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: South Central Iowa, USA

#12 Post by carbon_unit » Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:44 pm

It is not too big of a problem for me. I use the encryption at home and before I leave I turn off the encryption and shutdown. When I boot up later it is fine. Most place I go to don't use encryption no matter how much I preach to them. :?:
Xandros will probably release a new version next month if they follow the previous release cycle.
T60 2623-D7U, 3 GB Ram.
Dual boot XP and Linux Mint.
Registered linux user #160145

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Linux Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests