T42p or T43p 3DMark01 Benchmark Requested

Message

skibum1981 · #1 Post by **skibum1981** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:05 pm

Could someone please run a 3dmark01 benchmark on their p model? I am trying to compile a list of video benchmarks and I would like to see how the FireGL V3200 does. Here's what I got so far, FYI:

Model GPU 3DMark01

Dell Inspiron XPS Gen 2 Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra/256MB 23,522
Hypersonic Aviator EX7 ATI Radeon X800 256MB 20,686
HP nw8240 ATI Fire GL V5000/128MB 17,309
Gateway M680X ATI Radeon X700/128MB 16,694
Voodoo Envy m:515 Nvidia GeForce 6600/128MB 13,719
Acer Ferrari 3200 ATI Mobility Radeon 9700/128MB 10,859
Dell Inspiron 9300 ATI Radeon X300/128MB 9,609
Panasonic Toughbk 51 ATI Radeon 9600/64MB 9,553
Fujitsu Lifebook N3510 ATI Radeon X300/64MB DDR2 9,530
Sony S360 ATI Radeon 9700/64MB 8,105
HP nx6125 ATI Radeon X300/128MB (shared) 4,284
Dell Latitude D410 Intel integrated 915GM/128MB(shared) 4,226
IBM T43 ATI Radeon X300/64MB 2,909

(Source: Laptop Mag)

roast · #2 Post by **roast** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:50 pm

I don't have any 3dmark01's, but I have 3dmark03's and 3dmark05's with the stock IBM driver and Omega drivers.

stock ibm driver, 1024, No AA
3dmark03 - 3154
3dmark05 - 1247

omega 2.6.25a, 1024, No AA
3dmark03 - 3388
3dmark05 - 1449

pcmark04: 4177.
cpu: 4111, memory: 3470, graphics: 2533, hdd: 3733.

My model is the 2668-G2U with the FireGL v3200.

skibum1981 · #3 Post by **skibum1981** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:55 pm

Thanks for the benchmarks. Is there any way, for the sake of comparison, that you could run an '01?

roast · #4 Post by **roast** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:04 pm

skibum1981 wrote:Thanks for the benchmarks. Is there any way, for the sake of comparison, that you could run an '01?

Yea, sure. Give me an hour (and if it's not posted in an hour, later tonight; have a group project I need to do).

roast · #5 Post by **roast** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:25 pm

stock ibm driver, 1024, No AA
3dmark2001se (build 330) - 11675

Unfortunately I don't really want to re-install the omega driver because it totally messed up OpenGL, which I need. If I ever do try the Omega driver again, I'll re-run the bench.

skibum1981 · #6 Post by **skibum1981** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:20 pm

roast wrote:stock ibm driver, 1024, No AA
3dmark2001se (build 330) - 11675

Unfortunately I don't really want to re-install the omega driver because it totally messed up OpenGL, which I need. If I ever do try the Omega driver again, I'll re-run the bench.

Alright thanks so much Roast! Good to see how the "p" model stacks up...

nirvana0001 · #7 Post by **nirvana0001** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:25 pm

how come t43 with x300 only got 2909 in 3dmark01? I saw it got 95XX in another review.

skibum1981 · #8 Post by **skibum1981** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:27 pm

Finalized numbers with T43p:

Notebook Model; GPU; 3DMark01

Dell Inspiron XPS Gen 2; Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra/256MB; 23,522
Hypersonic Aviator EX7; ATI Radeon X800 256MB; 20,686
HP nw8240; ATI Fire GL V5000/128MB; 17,309
Gateway M680X; ATI Radeon X700/128MB; 16,694
Voodoo Envy m:515; Nvidia GeForce 6600/128MB; 13,719
IBM Thinkpad T43p; ATI Fire GL V3200/128mb; 11,675
Acer Ferrari 3200; ATI Mobility Radeon 9700/128MB; 10,859
Dell Inspiron 9300; ATI Radeon X300/128MB; 9,609
Panasonic Toughbook 51; ATI Radeon 9600/64MB; 9,553
Fujitsu Lifebook N3510; ATI Radeon X300/64MB; 9,530
Sony S360; ATI Radeon 9700/64MB; 8,105
HP nx6125; ATI Radeon X300/128MB (shared); 4,284
Dell Latitude; D410 Intel integrated 915GM/128MB(shared); 4,226
IBM T43; ATI Radeon X300/64MB; 2,909

Navck · #9 Post by **Navck** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:24 pm

Something looks rigged there
No way GMA can surpass an X300 with 64MB of dedicated RAM... I think 3dMark01 creators were payed by Dell *Cough*

nirvana0001 · #10 Post by **nirvana0001** » Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:47 pm

skibum1981, where you got those score?

FTC · #11 Post by **FTC** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:42 am

Hi, just in case you want to complete the table with another data point.I ran tests in a T42 2373-L77 (PM 1.8 w/radeon 9600/64M) and here are the results :

IBM Driver stock
3DMark01 9886
3DMark03 2525

Catalyst 5.6 Mobility Modded drivers
3DMark01 10306
3DMark03 2746

Catalyst 5.6 o/c to 400/230 (perfectly stable and no overheat at all)
3DMark01 11473
3DMark03 3099

Regards

skibum1981 · #12 Post by **skibum1981** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:44 pm

nirvana0001 wrote:skibum1981, where you got those score?

www.laptopmag.com

skibum1981 · #13 Post by **skibum1981** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:46 pm

Notebook Model; GPU; 3DMark01

Dell Inspiron XPS Gen 2; Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra/256MB; 23,522
Hypersonic Aviator EX7; ATI Radeon X800 256MB; 20,686
HP nw8240; ATI Fire GL V5000/128MB; 17,309
Gateway M680X; ATI Radeon X700/128MB; 16,694
Voodoo Envy m:515; Nvidia GeForce 6600/128MB; 13,719
IBM Thinkpad T43p; ATI Fire GL V3200/128mb; 11,675
Acer Ferrari 3200; ATI Mobility Radeon 9700/128MB; 10,859
IBM Thinkpad T42; ATI Radeon 9600/64MB; 9,886
Dell Inspiron 9300; ATI Radeon X300/128MB; 9,609
Panasonic Toughbook 51; ATI Radeon 9600/64MB; 9,553
Fujitsu Lifebook N3510; ATI Radeon X300/64MB; 9,530
Sony S360; ATI Radeon 9700/64MB; 8,105
HP nx6125; ATI Radeon X300/128MB (shared); 4,284
Dell Latitude; D410 Intel integrated 915GM/128MB (shared); 4,226
IBM Thinkpad T43; ATI Radeon X300/64MB; 2,909

skibum1981 · #14 Post by **skibum1981** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:47 pm

Can someone please do a 3Dmark01 of the T43 w/ the x300? I am quite a bit disturbed by Laptop Magazine's results ... I would imagine the T43 x300 could do better than that!

Navck · #15 Post by **Navck** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:16 pm

I will.

Navck · #16 Post by **Navck** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:37 pm

Blantant lies of the 3rd kind! I think Dell payed them to fix that benchmark number

T43 2687DDU on 1400x1050/Highest detail, no AA/AF Edit - Stock driver as well
5043 3dmarks

Custom built high end gaming desktop (Sapphire X800 Pro overclocked, Athlon +3200 939, ASUS A8V Deluxe, Crucial Ballistix high end DDR modules, 512x2mb (1024MB), etc)
21806 3dmarks

My TP got a score better than my older
Pentium 4/2.66GHz, Ge Force 3 Ti500, unknown model iWill mobo, 256x4 RDRAM Modules at 533MHz
3507 3dmarks

PS, that XPS Gen 2 =
CPU = Slightly "faster" (Slightly) vs my T43, comparablity slower than my desktop
Go 6800 Ultra = Actually equivlent to 6600GT underclocked in a desktop
PS, 512MB of ram on my T43... Sooo it ranks correct here.. I think someone lied on hose benchmarks to a new level of lying. *Cough hack cough*

Shows you what Dell does.

skibum1981 · #17 Post by **skibum1981** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:23 pm

It could have simply been a typo. An x300, though not a great chip, should outperform integrated graphics...

ddignam · #18 Post by **ddignam** » Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:09 pm

jeffman12 wrote:No one can benchmark a T42p?

I got 4028 on aT42p, running on battery but maximum performance

nrj45 · #19 Post by **nrj45** » Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:34 am

Hello,
Here are my results : 3DMark2001 SE with directx9.0 patch (unable to launch otherwise).
standard 400MHz(core) and 250Mhz(mem) : 11236pts
o/c@480Mhz(core) and 300Mhz (Mem) : 12717pts

Torque · #20 Post by **Torque** » Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:14 am

T41P

3Dmark01 score: 9.985 points.

roast · #21 Post by **roast** » Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:39 pm

Oh yea, I forgot that all my tests on my T43p was performed at the normal factory clock of 400MHz GPU/250MHz Memory. No overclocking over here, just underclocking when I'm not playing a game. =)

ZL · #22 Post by ZL » Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:59 pm

Appears to be a rather low score on the t43. Any comments on game play with a t43 or t43P? Bench marks are nice but may not make up not the whole story. I would like to know before buying a IBM t43 that it can effectively run a game. I do wish they would have add offered an upgrade on the 64 x300 to the 125 x300card. Geez

jeffman12 · #23 Post by **jeffman12** » Sat Jul 09, 2005 11:49 pm

Anyone got benchmarks for a T42p?

jeffman12 · #24 Post by **jeffman12** » Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:39 pm

No one can benchmark a T42p?

Tobben · #25 Post by **Tobben** » Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:43 am

skibum1981 wrote:Can someone please do a 3Dmark01 of the T43 w/ the x300? I am quite a bit disturbed by Laptop Magazine's results ... I would imagine the T43 x300 could do better than that!

My results on my T43 without overclocking:

3DMark01 SE - 8268
3DMark03 - 2163
3DMark05 - 1047

Henry · #26 Post by **Henry** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:45 pm

Has anyone tried 3DMark01 on the Radeon 7500 32 MB (T42). Or does the test work on it? I'm kind of curious...maybe I'll try it myself later.

nirvana0001 · #27 Post by **nirvana0001** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:50 pm

Henry wrote:Has anyone tried 3DMark01 on the Radeon 7500 32 MB (T42). Or does the test work on it? I'm kind of curious...maybe I'll try it myself later.

approixmately 4000

Henry · #28 Post by **Henry** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:56 pm

Yeah you're right. I've tried it and got 3877. I guess that's comparable to GMA 900. Quite surprised, considering it's a pretty old GPU.

thinkpadz · #29 Post by **thinkpadz** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:58 pm

i tried it and it wouldnt produce a score since one of the tests(nature) wasnt supported.

Henry wrote:Has anyone tried 3DMark01 on the Radeon 7500 32 MB (T42). Or does the test work on it? I'm kind of curious...maybe I'll try it myself later.

tom2517 · #30 Post by **tom2517** » Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:04 am

roast wrote:I don't have any 3dmark01's, but I have 3dmark03's and 3dmark05's with the stock IBM driver and Omega drivers.

stock ibm driver, 1024, No AA
3dmark03 - 3154
3dmark05 - 1247

omega 2.6.25a, 1024, No AA
3dmark03 - 3388
3dmark05 - 1449

pcmark04: 4177.
cpu: 4111, memory: 3470, graphics: 2533, hdd: 3733.

My model is the 2668-G2U with the FireGL v3200.

I got the exact score as you on the 3dmark05 on my T43p (2.13ghz)

T42p or T43p 3DMark01 Benchmark Requested

T42p or T43p 3DMark01 Benchmark Requested

Radeon 7500

Re: Radeon 7500

7500 Test Results

Re: Radeon 7500

Who is online