T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Message

thinkpadz · #1 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:29 pm

This is my T41P running @ everyday speeds.

1.6 pm 1.2vcore FireGL T2 380/260

1gb pc2700, 60 gb 16mb cache 5400 rpm drive, winxp-sp2

3dmark01 score 11,005

http://img319.imageshack.us/my.php?image=11k5ef.jpg

http://img319.imageshack.us/my.php?imag ... ail7br.jpg

More benches to come..

Sisoft Mem

http://img7.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mem0wp.jpg

Sisoft HardDrive

http://img7.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sshd4ff.jpg

Navck · #2 Post by **Navck** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:34 pm

T43 2687DDU on 1400x1050/Highest detail, no AA/AF Edit - Stock driver as well
5043 3dmarks

Ouch, that hurts.

Custom self built high end gaming desktop (Sapphire X800 Pro overclocked, Athlon +3200 939, ASUS A8V Deluxe, Crucial Ballistix high end DDR modules, 512x2mb (1024MB), etc)
21806 3dmarks

Good however that that T41p can compare up to that level.

Also - Why does that FireGL have 256MB of ram?

JHEM · #3 Post by **JHEM** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:37 pm

thinkpadz wrote:1.6 pm 1.2vcore FireGL T2 360/260

1gb pc2700, 60 gb 16mb cache 5400 rpm drive, winxp-sp2

How'd you wind up with a 1.6GHz processor and a 5400RPM in your GGU?

Mine has a 1.7GHz CPU and a 7K60!

Regards,

James

thinkpadz · #4 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:38 pm

I got 22,254 with a radeon 9500np!!!!!

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8183102

Navck wrote:T43 2687DDU on 1400x1050/Highest detail, no AA/AF Edit - Stock driver as well
5043 3dmarks

Ouch, that hurts.

Custom self built high end gaming desktop (Sapphire X800 Pro overclocked, Athlon +3200 939, ASUS A8V Deluxe, Crucial Ballistix high end DDR modules, 512x2mb (1024MB), etc)
21806 3dmarks

Good however that that T41p can compare up to that level.

Also - Why does that FireGL have 256MB of ram?

thinkpadz · #5 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:40 pm

cause its not really a ggu but close enough.
I just put this board in it yesterday.
it was a t41 2373-4gu...

JHEM wrote:
thinkpadz wrote:1.6 pm 1.2vcore FireGL T2 360/260

1gb pc2700, 60 gb 16mb cache 5400 rpm drive, winxp-sp2
How'd you wind up with a 1.6GHz processor and a 5400RPM in your GGU?

Mine has a 1.7GHz CPU and a 7K60!

Regards,

James

JHEM · #6 Post by **JHEM** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:50 pm

Navck wrote:Also - Why does that FireGL have 256MB of ram?

It's reported as:

Total Local Video Memory 128 MB
Total Local Texture Memory 128 MB
Total AGP Memory 256 MB

Regards,

James

JHEM · #7 Post by **JHEM** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:06 pm

thinkpadz wrote:cause its not really a ggu but close enough.
I just put this board in it yesterday.
it was a t41 2373-4gu...

What makes it even close to a GGU? I don't understand.

What did the board come out of?

Regards,

James

thinkpadz · #8 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:11 pm

well theres no 4gu with this sys board and aside from having a 1.6 instead of the 1.7 I'd say its the closest thing to it.

JHEM wrote:
thinkpadz wrote:cause its not really a ggu but close enough.
I just put this board in it yesterday.
it was a t41 2373-4gu...
What makes it even close to a GGU? I don't understand.

What did the board come out of?

Regards,

James

thinkpadz · #9 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:12 pm

apparently that is something with the driver cause its just 128mb T2.

JHEM wrote:
Navck wrote:Also - Why does that FireGL have 256MB of ram?
It's reported as:

Total Local Video Memory 128 MB
Total Local Texture Memory 128 MB
Total AGP Memory 256 MB

Regards,

James

JHEM · #10 Post by **JHEM** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:20 pm

thinkpadz wrote:well theres no 4gu with this sys board and aside from having a 1.6 instead of the 1.7 I'd say its the closest thing to it.

But you only have an XGA display and a 5400RPM HD, so I don't understand why you're comparing it to a T41p.

What machine did the system board come from?

Regards,

James

thinkpadz · #11 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:27 pm

its a new board.
it is the replacement board for t41p/t42p or r50 I believe.
IBM FRU # 27R1848
I may sell this lcd and upgrade to sxga havent decided yet.
as far as the drive goes...I've yet to see anyone post a hd bench mark with a 7200 rpm drive so I'm not really sold that they are faster than this drive anyway.
not to mention this drive doesn't consume the power the 7200 drives do.
Its consumes just a bit more than some of the 4200 rpm drives.

JHEM wrote:
thinkpadz wrote:well theres no 4gu with this sys board and aside from having a 1.6 instead of the 1.7 I'd say its the closest thing to it.
But you only have an XGA display and a 5400RPM HD, so I don't understand why you're comparing it to a T41p.

What machine did the system board come from?

Regards,

James

JHEM · #12 Post by **JHEM** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:40 pm

I get 8848 on my 2373GEU, 1.7GHz (set for adaptive), 1.5GB, 7K60 running the tests in XGA.

http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/I ... jectType=6

Regards,

James

JHEM · #13 Post by **JHEM** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:17 pm

thinkpadz wrote:as far as the drive goes...I've yet to see anyone post a hd bench mark with a 7200 rpm drive so I'm not really sold that they are faster than this drive anyway.

Just did a quick Sandra HD test, 29MB/s, but I've got a ton of apps open and Mailwasher checked for email at least twice.

thinkpadz wrote:not to mention this drive doesn't consume the power the 7200 drives do. Its consumes just a bit more than some of the 4200 rpm drives.

The same thing applies to the 7K60, besides the fact that as it's transferring data faster, it would actually use LESS battery power overall.

Regards,

James

thinkpadz · #14 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:30 pm

cool, thanks for the comparison.
and yeah, you may be right...
I guess I'm happy considering this is a 70$ ebay drive. The 16mb cache comes in handy when encoding etc...

JHEM wrote:
thinkpadz wrote:as far as the drive goes...I've yet to see anyone post a hd bench mark with a 7200 rpm drive so I'm not really sold that they are faster than this drive anyway.
Just did a quick Sandra HD test, 29MB/s, but I've got a ton of apps open and Mailwasher checked for email at least twice.
thinkpadz wrote:not to mention this drive doesn't consume the power the 7200 drives do. Its consumes just a bit more than some of the 4200 rpm drives.
The same thing applies to the 7K60, besides the fact that as it's transferring data faster, it would actually use LESS battery power overall.

Regards,

James

thinkpadz · #15 Post by **thinkpadz** » Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:37 pm

Looks like the IBM FGT2 Drivers are the way to go for apps/bench/cad/games...

11,254 3dmarks! from a t41p!

here's 3DMark01 score with T41P PM 1.6 1.2vcore/1gb ram/FireGL T2 385/265 /60gb hd/xp-sp2 everyday speeds(no pixel/texture tearing)

http://img36.imageshack.us/my.php?image=edph9wz.jpg

I'm using the latest IBM drivers found here:

http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site. ... MIGR-41918

I'm also having sucess running Q3, Doom3, HL2 etc without a hitch with these drivers...

They not only perform better for me than the omega and dna series but they do it all, cad, games, bench etc..

the other two were flakey at best with games...

btw....that bench was run from battery power, using the performance profile.

T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

Re: T41P FireGL T2 Bench mark results..

well 11.2k done with FGT2, not bad...

Who is online