T42 vs new G4 ibook

T4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
ddutta
Sophomore Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:28 pm

T42 vs new G4 ibook

#1 Post by ddutta » Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:49 am

Has anyone compared the performance of a 1.6G T42 vs the newly released Apple G4 iBook with 1.33G proc?

tehsoul
Freshman Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

#2 Post by tehsoul » Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:00 am

how can you compare performance? it's x86 vs ppc, with different operating systems

ddutta
Sophomore Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:28 pm

#3 Post by ddutta » Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:23 am

using common apps. eg firefox, photoshop, matlab etc

nrj45
Sophomore Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: switzerland

#4 Post by nrj45 » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:43 am

If somebody run such tests, he has to do this under linux (for the tp). Since MAC OS X has a linux core.
17.06.05:
t43p (2668G4G), PM750, 2Go dual, 1032GAX (100gb/5k/16mb) 2010 error msg, SXGA+ 14.1", V3200, DVD-RW, GBeth, Intel abg, bt, 9 cells, XPPro/Ubuntu, Fingerprint,
800MHz-0.7Vcore, LCD min -> 13Watts

kaiser
Freshman Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:59 am

#5 Post by kaiser » Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:05 am

nrj45 wrote:If somebody run such tests, he has to do this under linux (for the tp). Since MAC OS X has a linux core.
Apple states somehow other specs:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/

OS X uses a Mach Kernel and BSD Userland. Nothing about Linux.

desdinova
User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

#6 Post by desdinova » Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:00 am

I've owned a bunch of macs, including a last-gen iBook (1.2GHz).

They're fine machines and probably mostly comparable to the P-Ms.
I would say the P-Ms would win in CPU-heavy stuff though. Video encoding, 3d rendering, audio tracking, VSTs, what have you.

The G4 is powerful per clock, but it doesn't perform miracles. The system bus is still 133 and I'm told that even if it were faster, the CPU wouldn't be able to keep up with it as-is.

Firefox, I doubt you'll notice a difference.
Photoshop is heavily, I'm told, optimised for Altivec, so the difference is probably negligable.
Matlab, no clue.

You don't really buy an ibook because it's a speed demon, you buy an ibook because it's well made, gets good battlife (I got 6hours with mine) and it runs OSX well.
OSX is a dream to use, and many linux/x11 programs have been ported to it.

The best solution would be to find your local Apple store and just spend an hour playing with one, they have all kinds of apps installed on the machines in-store.

Good luck.

Steve007
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: UK

Re: T42 vs new G4 ibook

#7 Post by Steve007 » Fri Aug 19, 2005 9:33 am

ddutta wrote:Has anyone compared the performance of a 1.6G T42 vs the newly released Apple G4 iBook with 1.33G proc?
No. What's the point?
(2373-G3G) T40p/P-M 1.6GHz/1GB/60GB/14.1 SXGA/64MB ATI Fire GL 9000/CDRW-DVD/Cisco 802.11b/WinXP Pro SP2

(2373-8TG) T42/P-M 735/1GB/40GB/14.1 XGA/32MB ATI Radeon 7500/CDRW-DVD/Intel 802.11bg/WinXP Pro SP2

ddutta
Sophomore Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:28 pm

#8 Post by ddutta » Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:22 am

The precise point is this: for linux lovers, T42 can be a pain .... esp to get everything like suspend, ACPI etc working. At every step you need to put in decent amounts of effort. After doing all this, you may still have to run MSOffice. Of course there is Open Office which is great but you need to read MSOffice documents that look different in OO. Hence you need a OS with the robustness of Linux and open source and still be able to use some commercial software.

On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything else :) So what do you do? If only apple sold its OSX for the 86 platform. Then you could buy a coool T42/43 and use OSX. Its unfortunate that IBM touts itself as linux friendly but cant make its laptops 100% linux friendly ... ready to go .

Isnt the above reason good enough?

emorphien
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:21 am
Location: Rochester
Contact:

#9 Post by emorphien » Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:50 am

The Pentium M will clobber it in single application performance the majority of the time. Clock for clock the performance is very close, and with the P-M clocking higher its not much of a contest.
X31, T43p (on sale soon I think :( ), T400

tehsoul
Freshman Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

#10 Post by tehsoul » Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:51 am

ddutta wrote:The precise point is this: for linux lovers, T42 can be a pain .... esp to get everything like suspend, ACPI etc working. At every step you need to put in decent amounts of effort. After doing all this, you may still have to run MSOffice. Of course there is Open Office which is great but you need to read MSOffice documents that look different in OO. Hence you need a OS with the robustness of Linux and open source and still be able to use some commercial software.

On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything else :) So what do you do? If only apple sold its OSX for the 86 platform. Then you could buy a coool T42/43 and use OSX. Its unfortunate that IBM touts itself as linux friendly but cant make its laptops 100% linux friendly ... ready to go .

Isnt the above reason good enough?
first of all, there's loads on information on running linux on thinkpads, and with decent linux knowledge, it's easy to get everything up and running. hell, if you don't know how to troubleshoot something like acpi (in this case, just googling and reading up on the issue), you better stay away from linux anyway.

if you like osx, get an ibook/powerbook... it's not like apple's laptop design is as horrible as dell's. hell, i'll probably even get an apple x86 12" ibook once they're released!

nirvana0001
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

#11 Post by nirvana0001 » Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:11 am

install both systems on T42 :lol:
I am sure the new X86 system can work on PC platform
2008 Alienware M9750 - 17" WUXGA C2D 2.0Ghz 4GB SLI 7950GTX 100GB+200GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB

desdinova
User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

#12 Post by desdinova » Sat Aug 20, 2005 3:46 pm

nirvana0001 wrote:install both systems on T42 :lol:
I am sure the new X86 system can work on PC platform
It kind of runs like [censored], and you need an SSE3 enabled cpu to use Rosetta. Without Rosetta you're limited to osx/x86 apps only, no PPC emulation.

So, you'd have a buggy, unsupported OS with no apps! Sounds good to me! :P

beerak
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: EU

#13 Post by beerak » Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:27 pm

tehsoul wrote:
ddutta wrote:The precise point is this: for linux lovers, T42 can be a pain .... esp to get everything like suspend, ACPI etc working. At every step you need to put in decent amounts of effort. After doing all this, you may still have to run MSOffice. Of course there is Open Office which is great but you need to read MSOffice documents that look different in OO. Hence you need a OS with the robustness of Linux and open source and still be able to use some commercial software.

On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything else :) So what do you do? If only apple sold its OSX for the 86 platform. Then you could buy a coool T42/43 and use OSX. Its unfortunate that IBM touts itself as linux friendly but cant make its laptops 100% linux friendly ... ready to go .

Isnt the above reason good enough?
first of all, there's loads on information on running linux on thinkpads, and with decent linux knowledge, it's easy to get everything up and running. hell, if you don't know how to troubleshoot something like acpi (in this case, just googling and reading up on the issue), you better stay away from linux anyway.

if you like osx, get an ibook/powerbook... it's not like apple's laptop design is as horrible as dell's. hell, i'll probably even get an apple x86 12" ibook once they're released!
I agree if you don't know how to handle Linux problems on Txx then it does not mean it is not possible to solve ... Windows is quite cool system because every manufacturer has drivers but anyway Linux in the qualified hands is powerful tool without limits.
Let's go'n'restart :-)

ThinkPad X40

nirvana0001
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

#14 Post by nirvana0001 » Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:48 pm

desdinova wrote:
nirvana0001 wrote:install both systems on T42 :lol:
I am sure the new X86 system can work on PC platform
It kind of runs like [censored], and you need an SSE3 enabled cpu to use Rosetta. Without Rosetta you're limited to osx/x86 apps only, no PPC emulation.

So, you'd have a buggy, unsupported OS with no apps! Sounds good to me! :P
http://www.pconline.com.cn/notebook/ski ... 928_2.html
2008 Alienware M9750 - 17" WUXGA C2D 2.0Ghz 4GB SLI 7950GTX 100GB+200GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB

desdinova
User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

#15 Post by desdinova » Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:16 pm

I didn't say you can't do it, I just think it's pointless to. I've done it in vmware and native.

Even if you just want to play with it, you really should do it on an SSE3 enabled CPU. Which, if I'm not mistaken, isn't *any* Pentium-M. With the SSE3 machine, you'll be able to actually download and use apps. Without, you're stuck with iLife and xcode... whee!

If you've got an new(ish) A64 or a new(ish) PIV, by all means, rock out.

But if you want to *use* OSX, buy a mac.

nirvana0001
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

#16 Post by nirvana0001 » Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:44 pm

desdinova wrote:
I didn't say you can't do it, I just think it's pointless to. I've done it in vmware and native.

Even if you just want to play with it, you really should do it on an SSE3 enabled CPU. Which, if I'm not mistaken, isn't *any* Pentium-M. With the SSE3 machine, you'll be able to actually download and use apps. Without, you're stuck with iLife and xcode... whee!

If you've got an new(ish) A64 or a new(ish) PIV, by all means, rock out.

But if you want to *use* OSX, buy a mac.
But how come they installed a lot apps on that computer?
2008 Alienware M9750 - 17" WUXGA C2D 2.0Ghz 4GB SLI 7950GTX 100GB+200GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB

desdinova
User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

#17 Post by desdinova » Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:28 pm

nirvana0001 wrote:But how come they installed a lot apps on that computer?
Do you mean the apps in the dock?

Those all come with osx.
From left to right: Finder, Dashboard, Mail, Safari, iChat, Address book, iTunes, iPhoto, iCal, quicktime, control panel, a url, trash.

Nothing particularly useful.

beerak
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: EU

#18 Post by beerak » Sun Aug 21, 2005 3:38 am

Just take a look on the applications you want to use, if there is some important app depending on the OS you need to use then choose that one. If you're windows or OSX developer there is no choice. If not, then it doesn't matter :wink:
Let's go'n'restart :-)

ThinkPad X40

nirvana0001
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

#19 Post by nirvana0001 » Sun Aug 21, 2005 10:30 pm

not the apps in the dock. they installed some extra softwares.
2008 Alienware M9750 - 17" WUXGA C2D 2.0Ghz 4GB SLI 7950GTX 100GB+200GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB

tom2517
Freshman Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:28 am

#20 Post by tom2517 » Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:07 pm

ddutta wrote:using common apps. eg firefox, photoshop, matlab etc
I don't have the 1.6 thinkpad or the ibook. But I do have the 2.13 T43 and 1.5 17 inch powerbook. While there isn't much difference in word processing or firefox. the T43 is much faster processing my raw files in photoshop and converting it to jpeg.

Obviously my T43 has a faster processor but I want to note that G4 runs very very hot. In fact, it crashed very often when processing my raw files because it ran too hot. With my T43, I can let it run overnight and never worry it will crash due to heat.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests