T42 vs new G4 ibook
T42 vs new G4 ibook
Has anyone compared the performance of a 1.6G T42 vs the newly released Apple G4 iBook with 1.33G proc?
If somebody run such tests, he has to do this under linux (for the tp). Since MAC OS X has a linux core.
17.06.05:
t43p (2668G4G), PM750, 2Go dual, 1032GAX (100gb/5k/16mb) 2010 error msg, SXGA+ 14.1", V3200, DVD-RW, GBeth, Intel abg, bt, 9 cells, XPPro/Ubuntu, Fingerprint,
800MHz-0.7Vcore, LCD min -> 13Watts
t43p (2668G4G), PM750, 2Go dual, 1032GAX (100gb/5k/16mb) 2010 error msg, SXGA+ 14.1", V3200, DVD-RW, GBeth, Intel abg, bt, 9 cells, XPPro/Ubuntu, Fingerprint,
800MHz-0.7Vcore, LCD min -> 13Watts
Apple states somehow other specs:nrj45 wrote:If somebody run such tests, he has to do this under linux (for the tp). Since MAC OS X has a linux core.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/
OS X uses a Mach Kernel and BSD Userland. Nothing about Linux.
-
desdinova
- User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
I've owned a bunch of macs, including a last-gen iBook (1.2GHz).
They're fine machines and probably mostly comparable to the P-Ms.
I would say the P-Ms would win in CPU-heavy stuff though. Video encoding, 3d rendering, audio tracking, VSTs, what have you.
The G4 is powerful per clock, but it doesn't perform miracles. The system bus is still 133 and I'm told that even if it were faster, the CPU wouldn't be able to keep up with it as-is.
Firefox, I doubt you'll notice a difference.
Photoshop is heavily, I'm told, optimised for Altivec, so the difference is probably negligable.
Matlab, no clue.
You don't really buy an ibook because it's a speed demon, you buy an ibook because it's well made, gets good battlife (I got 6hours with mine) and it runs OSX well.
OSX is a dream to use, and many linux/x11 programs have been ported to it.
The best solution would be to find your local Apple store and just spend an hour playing with one, they have all kinds of apps installed on the machines in-store.
Good luck.
They're fine machines and probably mostly comparable to the P-Ms.
I would say the P-Ms would win in CPU-heavy stuff though. Video encoding, 3d rendering, audio tracking, VSTs, what have you.
The G4 is powerful per clock, but it doesn't perform miracles. The system bus is still 133 and I'm told that even if it were faster, the CPU wouldn't be able to keep up with it as-is.
Firefox, I doubt you'll notice a difference.
Photoshop is heavily, I'm told, optimised for Altivec, so the difference is probably negligable.
Matlab, no clue.
You don't really buy an ibook because it's a speed demon, you buy an ibook because it's well made, gets good battlife (I got 6hours with mine) and it runs OSX well.
OSX is a dream to use, and many linux/x11 programs have been ported to it.
The best solution would be to find your local Apple store and just spend an hour playing with one, they have all kinds of apps installed on the machines in-store.
Good luck.
Re: T42 vs new G4 ibook
No. What's the point?ddutta wrote:Has anyone compared the performance of a 1.6G T42 vs the newly released Apple G4 iBook with 1.33G proc?
(2373-G3G) T40p/P-M 1.6GHz/1GB/60GB/14.1 SXGA/64MB ATI Fire GL 9000/CDRW-DVD/Cisco 802.11b/WinXP Pro SP2
(2373-8TG) T42/P-M 735/1GB/40GB/14.1 XGA/32MB ATI Radeon 7500/CDRW-DVD/Intel 802.11bg/WinXP Pro SP2
(2373-8TG) T42/P-M 735/1GB/40GB/14.1 XGA/32MB ATI Radeon 7500/CDRW-DVD/Intel 802.11bg/WinXP Pro SP2
The precise point is this: for linux lovers, T42 can be a pain .... esp to get everything like suspend, ACPI etc working. At every step you need to put in decent amounts of effort. After doing all this, you may still have to run MSOffice. Of course there is Open Office which is great but you need to read MSOffice documents that look different in OO. Hence you need a OS with the robustness of Linux and open source and still be able to use some commercial software.
On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything else
So what do you do? If only apple sold its OSX for the 86 platform. Then you could buy a coool T42/43 and use OSX. Its unfortunate that IBM touts itself as linux friendly but cant make its laptops 100% linux friendly ... ready to go .
Isnt the above reason good enough?
On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything else
Isnt the above reason good enough?
first of all, there's loads on information on running linux on thinkpads, and with decent linux knowledge, it's easy to get everything up and running. hell, if you don't know how to troubleshoot something like acpi (in this case, just googling and reading up on the issue), you better stay away from linux anyway.ddutta wrote:The precise point is this: for linux lovers, T42 can be a pain .... esp to get everything like suspend, ACPI etc working. At every step you need to put in decent amounts of effort. After doing all this, you may still have to run MSOffice. Of course there is Open Office which is great but you need to read MSOffice documents that look different in OO. Hence you need a OS with the robustness of Linux and open source and still be able to use some commercial software.
On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything elseSo what do you do? If only apple sold its OSX for the 86 platform. Then you could buy a coool T42/43 and use OSX. Its unfortunate that IBM touts itself as linux friendly but cant make its laptops 100% linux friendly ... ready to go .
Isnt the above reason good enough?
if you like osx, get an ibook/powerbook... it's not like apple's laptop design is as horrible as dell's. hell, i'll probably even get an apple x86 12" ibook once they're released!
-
nirvana0001
- Junior Member

- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
-
desdinova
- User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
It kind of runs like [censored], and you need an SSE3 enabled cpu to use Rosetta. Without Rosetta you're limited to osx/x86 apps only, no PPC emulation.nirvana0001 wrote:install both systems on T42
I am sure the new X86 system can work on PC platform
So, you'd have a buggy, unsupported OS with no apps! Sounds good to me!
I agree if you don't know how to handle Linux problems on Txx then it does not mean it is not possible to solve ... Windows is quite cool system because every manufacturer has drivers but anyway Linux in the qualified hands is powerful tool without limits.tehsoul wrote:first of all, there's loads on information on running linux on thinkpads, and with decent linux knowledge, it's easy to get everything up and running. hell, if you don't know how to troubleshoot something like acpi (in this case, just googling and reading up on the issue), you better stay away from linux anyway.ddutta wrote:The precise point is this: for linux lovers, T42 can be a pain .... esp to get everything like suspend, ACPI etc working. At every step you need to put in decent amounts of effort. After doing all this, you may still have to run MSOffice. Of course there is Open Office which is great but you need to read MSOffice documents that look different in OO. Hence you need a OS with the robustness of Linux and open source and still be able to use some commercial software.
On the other hand, the T42 is such a fine piece of engineering that you dont want anything elseSo what do you do? If only apple sold its OSX for the 86 platform. Then you could buy a coool T42/43 and use OSX. Its unfortunate that IBM touts itself as linux friendly but cant make its laptops 100% linux friendly ... ready to go .
Isnt the above reason good enough?
if you like osx, get an ibook/powerbook... it's not like apple's laptop design is as horrible as dell's. hell, i'll probably even get an apple x86 12" ibook once they're released!
Let's go'n'restart 
ThinkPad X40
ThinkPad X40
-
nirvana0001
- Junior Member

- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
http://www.pconline.com.cn/notebook/ski ... 928_2.htmldesdinova wrote:It kind of runs like [censored], and you need an SSE3 enabled cpu to use Rosetta. Without Rosetta you're limited to osx/x86 apps only, no PPC emulation.nirvana0001 wrote:install both systems on T42
I am sure the new X86 system can work on PC platform
So, you'd have a buggy, unsupported OS with no apps! Sounds good to me!
2008 Alienware M9750 - 17" WUXGA C2D 2.0Ghz 4GB SLI 7950GTX 100GB+200GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB
-
desdinova
- User with bad email address, PLEASE fix!
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:03 am
- Location: Massachusetts
- Contact:
I didn't say you can't do it, I just think it's pointless to. I've done it in vmware and native.nirvana0001 wrote:http://www.pconline.com.cn/notebook/ski ... 928_2.html
Even if you just want to play with it, you really should do it on an SSE3 enabled CPU. Which, if I'm not mistaken, isn't *any* Pentium-M. With the SSE3 machine, you'll be able to actually download and use apps. Without, you're stuck with iLife and xcode... whee!
If you've got an new(ish) A64 or a new(ish) PIV, by all means, rock out.
But if you want to *use* OSX, buy a mac.
-
nirvana0001
- Junior Member

- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
But how come they installed a lot apps on that computer?desdinova wrote:
I didn't say you can't do it, I just think it's pointless to. I've done it in vmware and native.
Even if you just want to play with it, you really should do it on an SSE3 enabled CPU. Which, if I'm not mistaken, isn't *any* Pentium-M. With the SSE3 machine, you'll be able to actually download and use apps. Without, you're stuck with iLife and xcode... whee!
If you've got an new(ish) A64 or a new(ish) PIV, by all means, rock out.
But if you want to *use* OSX, buy a mac.
2008 Alienware M9750 - 17" WUXGA C2D 2.0Ghz 4GB SLI 7950GTX 100GB+200GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB
2007 Sony UX280p - 4.5" SVGA Core solo 1.2Ghz 1GB Ram 40GB HDD XP Pro
2007 Macbook Pro - 15.4" WSXGA C2D 2.33Ghz 2GB X1600 256MB 120GB
-
nirvana0001
- Junior Member

- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 pm
- Location: New York City
- Contact:
I don't have the 1.6 thinkpad or the ibook. But I do have the 2.13 T43 and 1.5 17 inch powerbook. While there isn't much difference in word processing or firefox. the T43 is much faster processing my raw files in photoshop and converting it to jpeg.ddutta wrote:using common apps. eg firefox, photoshop, matlab etc
Obviously my T43 has a faster processor but I want to note that G4 runs very very hot. In fact, it crashed very often when processing my raw files because it ran too hot. With my T43, I can let it run overnight and never worry it will crash due to heat.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 6 Replies
- 1352 Views
-
Last post by kfzhu1229
Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:08 pm
-
- 0 Replies
- 967 Views
-
Last post by AVN6293
Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:31 pm
-
-
T42 Boe-Hydis Panel Compatibility with T60
by Thinkpad4by3 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:34 pm » in ThinkPad T6x Series - 3 Replies
- 1697 Views
-
Last post by ajkula66
Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:53 am
-
-
- 6 Replies
- 1143 Views
-
Last post by shawross
Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:17 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests



