will extra ram improve graphics performance?
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
will extra ram improve graphics performance?
I have a T41p and would like to improve graphic performance, would increasing ram from 512 to 1 GB significantly improve the graphic performance?
Re: will extra ram improve graphics performance?
The only way to upgrade your performance is to get a new laptop..Jonathan Cordery wrote:I have a T41p and would like to improve graphic performance, would increasing ram from 512 to 1 GB significantly improve the graphic performance?
What graphics-intensive work do you do? Just curious..
Phil
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
There are 3 performance issues here.
1. the speed of the cpu; how fast it will run the program.
2. RAM; the amount of data it has to deal with without going to swap file.
3. Graphics performance in this case; how fast it can process the images.
Solution:
1. Nothing you can do unless you buy a faster TP.
2. More RAM will let you deal with greater amount of data without going to swap file, thus increasing performance in this respect.
3. The TP 'p' designated models has a Radeon graphic chip with its own dedicated memory. Adding more main memory is not going to help the graphic processing speed. Like #1, the only way to improve the graphic performance is to get a newer TP with better chip.
1. the speed of the cpu; how fast it will run the program.
2. RAM; the amount of data it has to deal with without going to swap file.
3. Graphics performance in this case; how fast it can process the images.
Solution:
1. Nothing you can do unless you buy a faster TP.
2. More RAM will let you deal with greater amount of data without going to swap file, thus increasing performance in this respect.
3. The TP 'p' designated models has a Radeon graphic chip with its own dedicated memory. Adding more main memory is not going to help the graphic processing speed. Like #1, the only way to improve the graphic performance is to get a newer TP with better chip.
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
Thanks aau007.
But buying a new 'p' laptop shouldn't really be the answer ast the T41p was sold as a workstation and should have better graphics performance than what I am achieving.
It has been reported elsewhere in this forum that the T41p has poor graphics performance. I rang IBM but they are not admitting that there is a problem with the T41p series graphics wise. I start a graphics processing exercise and the machine slows down considerably towards the end of it and the chip temperature rises to about 86 degrees celsius.
But buying a new 'p' laptop shouldn't really be the answer ast the T41p was sold as a workstation and should have better graphics performance than what I am achieving.
It has been reported elsewhere in this forum that the T41p has poor graphics performance. I rang IBM but they are not admitting that there is a problem with the T41p series graphics wise. I start a graphics processing exercise and the machine slows down considerably towards the end of it and the chip temperature rises to about 86 degrees celsius.
Use CHC to undervolt the CPU. That should fix the graphics slowing when temps get around 86deg celcius because it wont get that hot. Works for me on my T41p.
T61P 2.2ghz 4GB 7K200GB 15.4" WSXGA+ Vista 64
HP 2530p L7400 1.86Ghz 3GB 160GB Windows 7 Pro 64
(Hubby) HP 2510p U7500 1.06Ghz 2GB 5K120GB 12" LED WXGA XP Pro
(4 year old son) Toughbook CF-29 1.3Ghz 1.2GB 5K250GB 13.3" XGA XP Pro
HP 2530p L7400 1.86Ghz 3GB 160GB Windows 7 Pro 64
(Hubby) HP 2510p U7500 1.06Ghz 2GB 5K120GB 12" LED WXGA XP Pro
(4 year old son) Toughbook CF-29 1.3Ghz 1.2GB 5K250GB 13.3" XGA XP Pro
Jonny,
Let me elaborate and correct the information a little bit on #3.
The T41p comes with the ATI Mobility FireGL AGP4x with 128MB of dedicated graphics memory. While it can be considered a desktop replacement in many respect, it is certainly not desktop workstation performance. (BTW, I don't think IBM then ever advertised it would match a desktop workstation's performance)
Keep in mind that this is "Mobility FireGL" and in my dictionary, that's reduced performance (while gaining some power saving benefit) comparing with the real FireGL card.
It is in its inherited nature that when ATI's graphic chips (in general) are driven (by software) at full power, they emit a lot of heat and consume a lot of juice. Thus from IBM standpoint, there is no problem unless the chip actually gets hot enough to cause a meltdown.
When people reports poor graphic performance on T41p, are these comparisons based on multiple T41p(s) or T41p against other brand/model? If the performance is the same (good or bad) across multiple T41p, then there is no problem with the computer and you can only conclude that T41p's graphic performance does not match up with other brands in the same catagory. In all, T41p still outshines many others laptop in overall evaluations.
In the latest T43p, they now use the "Mobility" FireGL V3200 with PCIE. While I have never tested a T43p (because of the high price), I compared the T43 with the 'Mobility' Radeon x300 PCIE and it had similar graphic performance to the T41p. That will lead me to believe that the T43p has a big boost in graphic performance comparing to the T41p. T41p and T42p uses the same graphic chip so don't bother with T42p.
Let me elaborate and correct the information a little bit on #3.
The T41p comes with the ATI Mobility FireGL AGP4x with 128MB of dedicated graphics memory. While it can be considered a desktop replacement in many respect, it is certainly not desktop workstation performance. (BTW, I don't think IBM then ever advertised it would match a desktop workstation's performance)
Keep in mind that this is "Mobility FireGL" and in my dictionary, that's reduced performance (while gaining some power saving benefit) comparing with the real FireGL card.
It is in its inherited nature that when ATI's graphic chips (in general) are driven (by software) at full power, they emit a lot of heat and consume a lot of juice. Thus from IBM standpoint, there is no problem unless the chip actually gets hot enough to cause a meltdown.
When people reports poor graphic performance on T41p, are these comparisons based on multiple T41p(s) or T41p against other brand/model? If the performance is the same (good or bad) across multiple T41p, then there is no problem with the computer and you can only conclude that T41p's graphic performance does not match up with other brands in the same catagory. In all, T41p still outshines many others laptop in overall evaluations.
In the latest T43p, they now use the "Mobility" FireGL V3200 with PCIE. While I have never tested a T43p (because of the high price), I compared the T43 with the 'Mobility' Radeon x300 PCIE and it had similar graphic performance to the T41p. That will lead me to believe that the T43p has a big boost in graphic performance comparing to the T41p. T41p and T42p uses the same graphic chip so don't bother with T42p.
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
Am glad you brought up the CHC Teresa as I now have that programme and my next question was going to be what would be a good configuration for the T41p as basically I don't fully understand how to use it yet.
If you could post the settings that you use on your T41p, Teresa, that would be a great help.
Thanks in advance.
If you could post the settings that you use on your T41p, Teresa, that would be a great help.
Thanks in advance.
Well, for me, IBM never had the best of the GPUs. If you want blazing fast graphic performance for notebook, go buy Dell or HP. If you go read Autodesk's forums, most in there use Dell mobile workstations, because they always had the fastest GPU, and cheaper than IBM.Jonathan Cordery wrote:Thanks aau007.
But buying a new 'p' laptop shouldn't really be the answer ast the T41p was sold as a workstation and should have better graphics performance than what I am achieving.
It has been reported elsewhere in this forum that the T41p has poor graphics performance. I rang IBM but they are not admitting that there is a problem with the T41p series graphics wise. I start a graphics processing exercise and the machine slows down considerably towards the end of it and the chip temperature rises to about 86 degrees celsius.
T43p is not much better than T42p in terms of graphic performance or CPU performance. That is because ATI V3200 isn't much better than T2. I was very disappointed that T43 did not use V5000 like HP. So just comparing the 3 major brand, T43p would lag behind Dell and HP in terms of performance.
Download Prime 95 and set your steps at 6x, 8x, 9x, 10x, 12x. Lower all of these two steps down. Then, gradually, lower the topmost multiplier by one step and run Prime95. Keep lowering until you encounter an error. Raise it back again one step. Repeat for other multipliers.Jonathan Cordery wrote:Am glad you brought up the CHC Teresa as I now have that programme and my next question was going to be what would be a good configuration for the T41p as basically I don't fully understand how to use it yet.
If you could post the settings that you use on your T41p, Teresa, that would be a great help.
Thanks in advance.
Phil
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
Go up to your maximum multiplier, which is 17x. Start from 6x multiplier, and increase in intervals to 17x. (My X40 only goes up to 12x, as it's 1.2GHz)Jonathan Cordery wrote:... also, I have the possiblity to go to 17x, should I lower the voltage on this setting in stead of 12x?
And yes, lower all of your multipliers 2 steps initially. Gradually lower each step and test. Ulitmately, there should be an increasing voltage as the multiplier increases.
Last edited by pphilipko on Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Phil
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
You can scroll down...there'll be more space.Jonathan Cordery wrote:Thanks pphilipko I'm trying your suggestions now.
I only have the possiblity to set 4 settings, though, and not 5. Is it correct that I set them ALL to 1.484 v first and then lower them 2 steps down and then each one iteratively?
Use these multipliers:
6x, 8x, 9x, 10x, 12x, 14x, 16x, 17x
This tutorial might help.
http://www.notebookforums.com/showthread.php?t=70943
Phil
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
Ahh, yes didn't see the scroll bar there, thanks.
Well, it was worth a try but the CHC hasn't really made that much difference. The voltage settings I've used are:
6 x 0.700
8 x 0.764
10 x 0.844
12 x 0.956
14 x 1.052
17 x 1.244
This was as far as i could push it. I got a temperature decrease of 20 degrees but no increase in graphics performance at all.
Phil, thanks and good luck with your move!
Well, it was worth a try but the CHC hasn't really made that much difference. The voltage settings I've used are:
6 x 0.700
8 x 0.764
10 x 0.844
12 x 0.956
14 x 1.052
17 x 1.244
This was as far as i could push it. I got a temperature decrease of 20 degrees but no increase in graphics performance at all.
Phil, thanks and good luck with your move!
Sounds like you don't have an overheating problem if CHC didn't help. Since T42p has exace same video, it won't help to upgrade to that model. Whats cpu/memory/video specs do your applications call for?
T61P 2.2ghz 4GB 7K200GB 15.4" WSXGA+ Vista 64
HP 2530p L7400 1.86Ghz 3GB 160GB Windows 7 Pro 64
(Hubby) HP 2510p U7500 1.06Ghz 2GB 5K120GB 12" LED WXGA XP Pro
(4 year old son) Toughbook CF-29 1.3Ghz 1.2GB 5K250GB 13.3" XGA XP Pro
HP 2530p L7400 1.86Ghz 3GB 160GB Windows 7 Pro 64
(Hubby) HP 2510p U7500 1.06Ghz 2GB 5K120GB 12" LED WXGA XP Pro
(4 year old son) Toughbook CF-29 1.3Ghz 1.2GB 5K250GB 13.3" XGA XP Pro
-
Jonathan Cordery
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:11 pm
- Location: Mexico
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
How to improve audio on a Thinkpad T530 under Ubuntu?
by wrybread » Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:14 am » in Linux Questions - 1 Replies
- 1193 Views
-
Last post by wrybread
Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:38 pm
-
-
- 3 Replies
- 1489 Views
-
Last post by thinkpadcollection
Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:49 pm
-
-
T60 with Chicony keyboard -- T and R keys very often don't work unless pressed extra hard
by Muse » Mon Feb 06, 2017 1:19 pm » in ThinkPad T6x Series - 7 Replies
- 1124 Views
-
Last post by Muse
Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:04 am
-
-
-
T420: mSATA SSD performance issue [SOLVED]
by Farro » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:56 am » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 2 Replies
- 994 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:00 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest







