Overclocking a T42?
-
NotANitWit
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:07 am
Overclocking a T42?
Is it possible to overclock a Thinkpad? The T2X series was, which gave my brother endless bragging rights since at the time (circa 2000) the mobile P-III would clock higher than the desktop version, so it was the faster than the best desktop machines! I'm curious what the headroom is on the new Dothan Pentium-M chips.
Even if overclocking is possible, I wouldn't recommend it very much, but I'm very curious and kind of eager just to try.
One possible method would be with software like SoftFSB.
http://www.geocities.com/enigmadeadsouls/softfsb.html
The problem is that you need to know the specifics of the clock generator on the T42's motherboard, which I can't figure out.
Thanks for any ideas or help!
Even if overclocking is possible, I wouldn't recommend it very much, but I'm very curious and kind of eager just to try.
One possible method would be with software like SoftFSB.
http://www.geocities.com/enigmadeadsouls/softfsb.html
The problem is that you need to know the specifics of the clock generator on the T42's motherboard, which I can't figure out.
Thanks for any ideas or help!
-
NotANitWit
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:07 am
Followup to my previous post.
It turns out that the 2.0GHz T42 is indeed overclockable with SoftFSB,
though pretty much as a party-trick since the speed boost will go away as soon as you reboot. Finding the limits is also frustrating because of the many reboots when the laptop crashes/freezes.
My T42 has a 755 Dothan in it, so it's already top-end 2.0Ghz, but it turns out there's a lot of headroom in there! I had no problem reaching 2.3 Ghz!
However the speed seems very heat limited. As evidence, if I start the laptop after a long cooldown (turned off for 1 hour), I can run at 2.5 Ghz for about 5 minutes while running Prime95 (a CPU stress tool) before errors appear. 2.3 Ghz seems fine forever.
Kudos to IBM (and Intel) for making sure the 755 T42 can handle the full 2.0 Ghz with so much safety margin. This implies that you could even let your machine cook in sunlight on a hot day and it's not going to be unreliable since it's at least 15% below its real top speed.
It turns out that the 2.0GHz T42 is indeed overclockable with SoftFSB,
though pretty much as a party-trick since the speed boost will go away as soon as you reboot. Finding the limits is also frustrating because of the many reboots when the laptop crashes/freezes.
My T42 has a 755 Dothan in it, so it's already top-end 2.0Ghz, but it turns out there's a lot of headroom in there! I had no problem reaching 2.3 Ghz!
However the speed seems very heat limited. As evidence, if I start the laptop after a long cooldown (turned off for 1 hour), I can run at 2.5 Ghz for about 5 minutes while running Prime95 (a CPU stress tool) before errors appear. 2.3 Ghz seems fine forever.
Kudos to IBM (and Intel) for making sure the 755 T42 can handle the full 2.0 Ghz with so much safety margin. This implies that you could even let your machine cook in sunlight on a hot day and it's not going to be unreliable since it's at least 15% below its real top speed.
-
plucky duck
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 10:50 am
So you're saying that you've found the proper clock generator and overclocked the T42? What fsb/multiplier/voltage settings did you use?
Wonder if it's the same for the X31 and whether it's possible to overclock the P-M 1.6Ghz proc.
Seems very dangerous to do in a laptop enclosed environment. Not to mention voiding warranty as well.
Wonder if it's the same for the X31 and whether it's possible to overclock the P-M 1.6Ghz proc.
Seems very dangerous to do in a laptop enclosed environment. Not to mention voiding warranty as well.
I am Canadian
-
NotANitWit
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2004 12:07 am
You can't change the multiplier or the voltage AFAIK... though I wonder about that since doesn't Speedstep manipulate both?
I just increased FSB from 200 to 228. That seemed to be the stable limit.
I didn't try all the peripherals though, I wouldn't be surprised if something like the modem port or IR or whatever got annoyed at being run faster than it was used to.
I had to force full speed CPU mode, Adaptive mode caused strange things to happen (read, crashes). Also, a lot of repeated changes with the FSB was bad, it was always best to reboot, then change FSB once.
Yes, the closed laptop was definately a limit, imagine what a P-M would do with one of those 1-kg heatsinks on it, or watercooling!
I doubt I voided the warranty, I never opened the case, I only ran software.
But this isn't BIOS based overclocking so it's not really great, more of fun to experiment with as opposed to a perminent way to get a speed boost. Too bad!
I just increased FSB from 200 to 228. That seemed to be the stable limit.
I didn't try all the peripherals though, I wouldn't be surprised if something like the modem port or IR or whatever got annoyed at being run faster than it was used to.
I had to force full speed CPU mode, Adaptive mode caused strange things to happen (read, crashes). Also, a lot of repeated changes with the FSB was bad, it was always best to reboot, then change FSB once.
Yes, the closed laptop was definately a limit, imagine what a P-M would do with one of those 1-kg heatsinks on it, or watercooling!
I doubt I voided the warranty, I never opened the case, I only ran software.
But this isn't BIOS based overclocking so it's not really great, more of fun to experiment with as opposed to a perminent way to get a speed boost. Too bad!
-
plucky duck
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 10:50 am
-
edelrc
- Junior Member

- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: West Bloomfield, MI / Barcelona, Spain
- Contact:
NotANitWit, I am with you.
Now we do not only know the capacities of our notebooks, but also we learn a deal also on how they design it in first place.
By testing the limits of what surrounds us it is the way our the society progress. Terrific job done with that processor!
Thanks in name of the fascinated out there, (or that those that are afraid to tests the limits of their loved ThinkPads…)
Now we do not only know the capacities of our notebooks, but also we learn a deal also on how they design it in first place.
By testing the limits of what surrounds us it is the way our the society progress. Terrific job done with that processor!
Thanks in name of the fascinated out there, (or that those that are afraid to tests the limits of their loved ThinkPads…)
X220t IPS but but a bit unhappy with it
T60p 2007-93U 1600x1200 IPS (T42p is an overall better machine though. Lack of new IPS Thinkpads keeps me buying these older models!)
T42p 2373-KXU 1600x1200 IPS (The best ever!!)
A20p 2629-6UU 1400x1050 (My first Thinkpad!)
T60p 2007-93U 1600x1200 IPS (T42p is an overall better machine though. Lack of new IPS Thinkpads keeps me buying these older models!)
T42p 2373-KXU 1600x1200 IPS (The best ever!!)
A20p 2629-6UU 1400x1050 (My first Thinkpad!)
You can use RadLinker or RadClocker to OC the video (both Radeon and FireGL) and set it on a permanent basis or on a per-game/per-app basis. From a battery life and system life standpoint, better to just OC when you're playing a game or need/want the extra horsepower. I believe RadLinker also comes with the Omega driver distribution too.
Daniel
Daniel
MacBook Pro 15" Retina Display / 2.6GHz Ci7 / 16GB DDR3/ 512GB SSD / Mac OS X 10.9.3
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 6 Replies
- 1342 Views
-
Last post by kfzhu1229
Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:08 pm
-
- 0 Replies
- 967 Views
-
Last post by AVN6293
Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:31 pm
-
-
T42 Boe-Hydis Panel Compatibility with T60
by Thinkpad4by3 » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:34 pm » in ThinkPad T6x Series - 3 Replies
- 1696 Views
-
Last post by ajkula66
Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:53 am
-
-
- 6 Replies
- 1135 Views
-
Last post by shawross
Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:17 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



