1.6Ghz 2MB or 1.7Ghz 1MB which is better upgrade?

T4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
umern
Freshman Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:40 am
Location: East London, UK

1.6Ghz 2MB or 1.7Ghz 1MB which is better upgrade?

#1 Post by umern » Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:57 am

Have done a search on 'cpu upgrade' but still cant seem to come up with a definitive answer on how many pins CPU my T40 will take.

Read in one post that all T40's are 478 pin and then another post stated 479 pins and now posted 'cmarti' is selling a 478 CPU on Ebay from his/her T40.

Can someone provide a definite answer and also any further tips on which CPUs will work with a T40.

Many thanks!
Last edited by umern on Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

lithium726
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:05 pm
Location: Texas Tech
Contact:

#2 Post by lithium726 » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:37 pm

ok, heres how this goes... the p4, pentium m, and core duo all have hte same number of pins. they also all use the same FSB, and are all electrically compatable.

now then, the p4, the pentium M, and the core duo all have different pinouts. a pentium M will not fit in a core duo or p4 socket, just like the others will not fit in teh sockets meant for the other ones.

further, any processor listed with "479pin" on the intel spec sheet is actually a BGA chip, meant for low profile systems, like the X series.

so, any pentium M you get on ebay will fit in there. people dont sell BGA chips, they have to be soldiered to the motherboard. now then, for your T40, you need the latest BIOS and EC updates, and any Pentium M with the 400mhz FSB will work in your system. do not get a 533mhz part, it will not work.
Thinkpad T60 2613-CTO (2\4m\667, 3GB, 200GB 7200, DVD-RW DL, SXGA+, 3945ABG, 128MB x1400, GBe, BT IV)
Thinkpad T40 2373-PU7 (1.7\2m\400, 2GB, 120GB 5400, DVD\CDRW, SXGA+, Intel 2915ABG, 32MB MR7500, GBe, BT II)
Thinkpad T23 2648-PS1 (1.2, 512mb, 2915ABG)

brentpresley
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:19 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

#3 Post by brentpresley » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:53 pm

lithium726 wrote:ok, heres how this goes... the p4, pentium m, and core duo all have hte same number of pins. they also all use the same FSB, and are all electrically compatable.

now then, the p4, the pentium M, and the core duo all have different pinouts. a pentium M will not fit in a core duo or p4 socket, just like the others will not fit in teh sockets meant for the other ones.

further, any processor listed with "479pin" on the intel spec sheet is actually a BGA chip, meant for low profile systems, like the X series.

so, any pentium M you get on ebay will fit in there. people dont sell BGA chips, they have to be soldiered to the motherboard. now then, for your T40, you need the latest BIOS and EC updates, and any Pentium M with the 400mhz FSB will work in your system. do not get a 533mhz part, it will not work.
Great explanation. Just wanted to chime in on the 533MHz CPUs on the T40-42. TECHNICALLY they will work, they will just run at 400MHz FSB speeds. So that fast 2.26GHz chip you may be eyeing, will max out at 1.7GHz - so it defeats the purpose. :D
Custom T60p
2.33GHz 4MB 667MHz Core 2 Duo
4GB PC2-5300 DDR SDRAM
Bluetooth / Atheros ABGN
200GB 7k200 7200RPM Hard Drive
8X DVD Multiburner
15" UXGA - ATI FireGL V5250 (256MB)

http://www.xcpus.com

lithium726
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:05 pm
Location: Texas Tech
Contact:

#4 Post by lithium726 » Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:03 pm

while that is possible, its also possible they might not boot if the chipset cannot interpret the hi-lo signal coming from FSB signal pins... anyone tried that? :P
Thinkpad T60 2613-CTO (2\4m\667, 3GB, 200GB 7200, DVD-RW DL, SXGA+, 3945ABG, 128MB x1400, GBe, BT IV)
Thinkpad T40 2373-PU7 (1.7\2m\400, 2GB, 120GB 5400, DVD\CDRW, SXGA+, Intel 2915ABG, 32MB MR7500, GBe, BT II)
Thinkpad T23 2648-PS1 (1.2, 512mb, 2915ABG)

brentpresley
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:19 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

#5 Post by brentpresley » Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:19 pm

lithium726 wrote:while that is possible, its also possible they might not boot if the chipset cannot interpret the hi-lo signal coming from FSB signal pins... anyone tried that? :P
I've done it. They will boot just fine.
Custom T60p
2.33GHz 4MB 667MHz Core 2 Duo
4GB PC2-5300 DDR SDRAM
Bluetooth / Atheros ABGN
200GB 7k200 7200RPM Hard Drive
8X DVD Multiburner
15" UXGA - ATI FireGL V5250 (256MB)

http://www.xcpus.com

umern
Freshman Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:40 am
Location: East London, UK

1.6Ghz 2MB or 1.7Ghz 1MB

#6 Post by umern » Tue Mar 07, 2006 5:51 am

Thanks for the all the replies chaps.


OK - one other question please...

Which do you think will be a better upgrade : 1.6Ghz 2MB or 1.7Ghz 1MB ?

I currently have a 1.3GHz 1MB

princeatul
Freshman Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:04 am
Location: Pittsburgh, US
Contact:

Depends...

#7 Post by princeatul » Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:57 am

It's subjective, and depends on your usage. This is what most will tell you.
But given the fact there's only .1GHz difference, I believe 1.6Ghz 2MB will give you more tangible boost in performance.
IBM T43 2686-E7U 14.1" SXGA+, 1.86GHz, 1.5GB, Hitachi 7K100 80GB @7200, DVD-RW, Intel 2915ABG
It is the sweet, simple things of life which are the real ones after all.

FTC
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:02 am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

#8 Post by FTC » Tue Mar 07, 2006 8:24 am

Hi, don't forget also that the 1.6/2M is a Dothan processor, and the 1.7/1M is probably a Banias (unless it is a celeron, in which case it will not have speedstep and other wonders), so the 1.6 will work much more relaxed i.e cooler not only due to the speed difference, but also the manufacturing technology used... and this is something your lap, table, ... will be gratefull for. So I'd also vote for the 1.6/2M.
760CD -> 770X -> 600E -> T23 -> T40 -> T42 -> T400 -> T430
Thinkpad T430 i5 3320M 320GB HD, 8GB Mem

Aroc
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Solon, OH, USA

#9 Post by Aroc » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:06 pm

I'd get the 2MB chip.
IBM X220 | T61p | R61e | T43 | Black Macbook | i5 Hackintosh | i7 iMac 27 | Dell 3007WFP-HC WQXGA

monkey243
Sophomore Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 9:39 am
Location: GUANGZHOU CHINA
Contact:

#10 Post by monkey243 » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:35 pm

I think 1.6G with 2M L2cach should be better.In most case,there is no different performence between 1.6G and 1.7G,but 2M cach and 1M are not the same thing.
IBM X31 2672B1J 1.3G/1G/120G/CISCO 350

umern
Freshman Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:40 am
Location: East London, UK

#11 Post by umern » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:57 pm

Well I got outbid on the 1.7ghz 1MB chip so the decision has been made for me!
Thanks for the advice guys.

cmarti
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1935
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:26 am
Location: Orlando, Florida
Contact:

#12 Post by cmarti » Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:23 am

I think a 1.8Ghz with 2Mb of cache is better.

And a lower price is perfect!!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... RK:MESE:IT
X32/2.0GHZ/2GB/ENGENIUS EMP-8602+S 600mw mini pci/WD 250GB
X60/1.83GHZ/2GB/Atheros/7K100

umern
Freshman Member
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:40 am
Location: East London, UK

#13 Post by umern » Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:34 am

Thanks cmarti - I already contacted you on Ebay about UK postage charge - but was concerned about being hit for Customs Duty etc when it comes into the UK. There is a real risk of the tax plus handling charge from the UK Royal Mail.

Plus your auction ends at 4am UK time so not really suited to my style of bidding (last minute!).

In the end I just did a BIN on a 1.6Ghz 2MB from a UK seller for £59.

nmuntz
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:35 pm

#14 Post by nmuntz » Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:28 pm

If you put a 400MHz chip in a Sonoma machine (T43) will it run at 400 or 533? That could be a way to underclock that NB that seems to throw so much heat.

brentpresley
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:19 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

#15 Post by brentpresley » Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:28 pm

nmuntz wrote:If you put a 400MHz chip in a Sonoma machine (T43) will it run at 400 or 533? That could be a way to underclock that NB that seems to throw so much heat.
It will run at 400, but the NB will not be that much cooler b/c I will still run the memory async at 533.
Custom T60p
2.33GHz 4MB 667MHz Core 2 Duo
4GB PC2-5300 DDR SDRAM
Bluetooth / Atheros ABGN
200GB 7k200 7200RPM Hard Drive
8X DVD Multiburner
15" UXGA - ATI FireGL V5250 (256MB)

http://www.xcpus.com

Kerensa
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:49 am

#16 Post by Kerensa » Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:57 pm

lithium726 wrote: and any Pentium M with the 400mhz FSB will work in your system. do not get a 533mhz part, it will not work.
I just wanted to ask again.. A PM 1.8 with 2MB will work in a T40 model 2373? It does not matter the particular system board that is in the system? Will I notice much change from a 1.3 with 1MB?

Thank you for your help,
Kerensa

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests