IBM Slams Brakes on SP2 Update
IBM Slams Brakes on SP2 Update
http://www.microscope.co.uk/articles/ar ... h=&nPage=1
IBM has ordered its staff not to install Service Pack 2 (SP2) for Windows XP because of compatibility issues.
"IBM's large number of web applications will need to be tested and some modified to work correctly with SP2," IBM has warned its employees. "Currently, some high-profile, business-critical applications are also known to conflict with SP2. When the current issues and concerns have been addressed, IBM will deploy a customised version of SP2."
With close to 400,000 desktops, IBM is a very large Microsoft customer indeed.
The company warned its users off SP2 on the same day Microsoft released it for manufacturing. The XP update will be available soon through downloads, shops and free CDs, as well as on new PCs. A network installation package will be available for enterprise users.
SP2 for Windows XP is more than the usual roll-up of bug fixes and updates, with Microsoft trading off compatibility for security. As a result, it may not run existing applications and Microsoft has urged developers and IT professionals to test the update.
And IBM isn't the only company with SP2 compatibility issues. Microsoft's own software is also affected. The company has already released an update for its CRM customer relationship management software because it won't run correctly under SP2.
The broad changes to SP2 have led analysts to liken it to a Windows upgrade rather than a simple update. Business users typically take much longer to install a new version of Windows than a service pack because they do compatibility testing first.
Thomas Smith, manager of desktop engineering at a large US company, hopes to equip his 5,000 desktops with a custom version of SP2 before Microsoft pushes it out on Windows Update.
Smith manages desktops scattered throughout the US with common high-speed internet connections such as DSL or cable using Altiris's remote management tool and relying on Windows Update for patches. He said that If he applied the standard SP2 distribution to his machines, it would block access to several corporate web applications.
Microsoft Windows group manager Barry Goffe said Microsoft would help users in Smith's position. The software maker plans to offer simple ways to set a unique registry key on XP desktops that will instruct the systems to skip SP2 but download other critical updates through Windows Update and Automatic Update.
"We want to give customers some breathing room," Goffe said, but added that Microsoft was urging all users to install SP2 as soon possible.
"This is not about fun and games," he said. "SP2 is about improving the security of our customers' infrastructure. We have spent a lot of time making sure that this delivers a lot of value to all our customers."
Michael Cherry, lead analyst at Directions on Microsoft, said business users obviously needed to test but could not blame Microsoft for any unpleasant surprises in SP2.
"Microsoft has been more than forthcoming about the number of changes in this service pack and making it available for testing," Cherry said. "IT departments should get their testing done quickly because there are significant improvements in this service pack that I am not sure they would want to forgo."
IBM has ordered its staff not to install Service Pack 2 (SP2) for Windows XP because of compatibility issues.
"IBM's large number of web applications will need to be tested and some modified to work correctly with SP2," IBM has warned its employees. "Currently, some high-profile, business-critical applications are also known to conflict with SP2. When the current issues and concerns have been addressed, IBM will deploy a customised version of SP2."
With close to 400,000 desktops, IBM is a very large Microsoft customer indeed.
The company warned its users off SP2 on the same day Microsoft released it for manufacturing. The XP update will be available soon through downloads, shops and free CDs, as well as on new PCs. A network installation package will be available for enterprise users.
SP2 for Windows XP is more than the usual roll-up of bug fixes and updates, with Microsoft trading off compatibility for security. As a result, it may not run existing applications and Microsoft has urged developers and IT professionals to test the update.
And IBM isn't the only company with SP2 compatibility issues. Microsoft's own software is also affected. The company has already released an update for its CRM customer relationship management software because it won't run correctly under SP2.
The broad changes to SP2 have led analysts to liken it to a Windows upgrade rather than a simple update. Business users typically take much longer to install a new version of Windows than a service pack because they do compatibility testing first.
Thomas Smith, manager of desktop engineering at a large US company, hopes to equip his 5,000 desktops with a custom version of SP2 before Microsoft pushes it out on Windows Update.
Smith manages desktops scattered throughout the US with common high-speed internet connections such as DSL or cable using Altiris's remote management tool and relying on Windows Update for patches. He said that If he applied the standard SP2 distribution to his machines, it would block access to several corporate web applications.
Microsoft Windows group manager Barry Goffe said Microsoft would help users in Smith's position. The software maker plans to offer simple ways to set a unique registry key on XP desktops that will instruct the systems to skip SP2 but download other critical updates through Windows Update and Automatic Update.
"We want to give customers some breathing room," Goffe said, but added that Microsoft was urging all users to install SP2 as soon possible.
"This is not about fun and games," he said. "SP2 is about improving the security of our customers' infrastructure. We have spent a lot of time making sure that this delivers a lot of value to all our customers."
Michael Cherry, lead analyst at Directions on Microsoft, said business users obviously needed to test but could not blame Microsoft for any unpleasant surprises in SP2.
"Microsoft has been more than forthcoming about the number of changes in this service pack and making it available for testing," Cherry said. "IT departments should get their testing done quickly because there are significant improvements in this service pack that I am not sure they would want to forgo."
-
ian
- **SENIOR** Member

- Posts: 765
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 1:18 am
- Location: Auch, SW France
- Contact:
Bloody good job too - why on earth are there so many Lemmings with Thinkpads...
Every single critical patch has caused someone somewhere problems - calm down guys, you'll get it soon enough - just let someother lemming test it first - preferably IBM as they can repair their own machines cheaper...
Every single critical patch has caused someone somewhere problems - calm down guys, you'll get it soon enough - just let someother lemming test it first - preferably IBM as they can repair their own machines cheaper...
Ian at thinkpads dot com
-
RoadHazard
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 10:29 am
- Location: Bangkok, THAILAND
Well Ian, I do have to disagree with you on this one.ian wrote:Bloody good job too - why on earth are there so many Lemmings with Thinkpads...
Every single critical patch has caused someone somewhere problems - calm down guys, you'll get it soon enough - just let someother lemming test it first - preferably IBM as they can repair their own machines cheaper...
1. I have done every single patch and Service Pack since SP3 for NT4 Workstation all the way through Windows 2000 and Windows XP Pro. There were 3 failures: SP6 for NT4 had to be quickly replaced with 6a to fix a Lotus Notes error; one Windows 2000 hotfix had to be repaired as it precluded copying very large files (like Virtual Machines) and Service Pack 5 for NT4 was (in my experience, usage and opinion) a total failure. but that is not "every" critical patch. And I use a *lot* of software - just not custom software.
2. Having experimented on a separate hard drive to my satisfaction, I have installed SP2 on my ThinkPad in production. So far (as I expected from my careful testing), everything works. Yet I am not a lemming just because I did it.
So on my XP Pro ThinkPad (T41 2373-1HU), I have *every* Microsoft Patch; *every* IBM application updated including BIOS and Embedded Controller; *every* patch for Office XP Pro; and to the best of my ability, every other application updated to its most recent version.
I regret nothing, and the machine is working flawlessly. Just my own view, please understand and no offence intended. ... JDHurst
-
boardmonger
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 10:10 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Contact:
Maybe I read this wrong, but I was more thinking IBM might have problems with some of their business software. The first post talks about how Microsofts CRM software had to be patched. I more thought IBM would have problems with their CRM software and maybe some JAVA/Web based stuff. (I think that is what some of the IBM stuff is written in.)
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
BIOS update - ok to jump 11 updates in one update?
by serpico » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:53 am » in ThinkPad T430/T530 and later Series - 6 Replies
- 490 Views
-
Last post by MikalE
Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:21 pm
-
-
-
R&R XP SP2 with USB stick
by jazz » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:26 pm » in Windows OS (Versions prior to Windows 7) - 1 Replies
- 622 Views
-
Last post by RealBlackStuff
Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:41 pm
-
-
-
x200T and Windows 7 update
by Billaboard » Sun Jan 01, 2017 2:57 pm » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 10 Replies
- 1737 Views
-
Last post by Bob_II
Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:42 pm
-
-
-
W520 4282-4YU... Fair Pricing? UPDATE 1/10/17... DEAD ISSUE
by olex126 » Thu Jan 05, 2017 8:35 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 10 Replies
- 687 Views
-
Last post by olex126
Tue Jan 10, 2017 5:12 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests






