Preliminary Santa Rosa platform power consumption figures

General Questions, Rumors, Real news & More
Post Reply
Message
Author
K. Eng
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1946
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:10 am
Location: Pennsylvania, United States

Preliminary Santa Rosa platform power consumption figures

#1 Post by K. Eng » Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:16 pm

Santa Rosa is the next generation Intel mobile platform, consisting of a Core 2 Duo processor, 965 series chipset, and Intel Wireless (Compare to today's Napa platform, which is a Core or Core 2, 945 series chipset, and 3935ABG wireless card).

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33229

The chart shows that the 965 chipset will have a max TDP of 16.2 Watts compared to the 945's 8.7 Watts. Now these are near worst case figures, but this seems to bode ill for both the temperature of Santa Rosa notebooks as well as their battery life.

The Napa platform may just hang in there for awhile, since it is Core 2 compatible, and is very thrifty in power consumption.
Homebuilt PC: AMD Athlon XP (Barton) @ 1.47 GHz; nForce2 Ultra; 1GB RAM; 80GB HDD @ 7200RPM; ATI Radeon 9600; Integrated everything else!

sugo
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1813
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Seattle, WA

#2 Post by sugo » Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:06 pm

Santa Rosa is still 1 year away from launch. I can't imagine intel pushing a 16W chipset out like that.
X61

simms
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:27 pm
Location: Toronto

#3 Post by simms » Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:59 pm

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... i=2808&p=1

Testing has shown performance is better with equal or more battery life with santa rosa...

K. Eng
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1946
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:10 am
Location: Pennsylvania, United States

#4 Post by K. Eng » Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:39 pm

Look again - the AnandTech report is not testing the Santa Rosa platform. That test is a comparison of Core and Core 2 on the Napa platform (945PM chipset).

Core 2 is more efficient than Core at a given performance level. However, it remains to be seen whether the Santa Rosa chipset is as efficient as the 945.
Homebuilt PC: AMD Athlon XP (Barton) @ 1.47 GHz; nForce2 Ultra; 1GB RAM; 80GB HDD @ 7200RPM; ATI Radeon 9600; Integrated everything else!

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests