Performance score
Performance score
Hi
I own a 2007-94U (T60 2.16Ghz) and went accross the Performance Score of Vista.
My readings are:
- Processor : 4.5
- RAM: 4.9
- Graphics: 4.2
- Gaming: 4.6
- HDD: 5.0
As Graphics is the lowest and that I am currently using standard drivers I was wondering if by using the ones released by Lenovo, one would get a better performance score.
Any experience?
I own a 2007-94U (T60 2.16Ghz) and went accross the Performance Score of Vista.
My readings are:
- Processor : 4.5
- RAM: 4.9
- Graphics: 4.2
- Gaming: 4.6
- HDD: 5.0
As Graphics is the lowest and that I am currently using standard drivers I was wondering if by using the ones released by Lenovo, one would get a better performance score.
Any experience?
T42, T60p
T60p Score
I'm getting a 4.3 due to graphics as well, running the beta lenovo drivers on my t60p.
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8367
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: Performance score
I don't know what you mean by "standard drivers" but it's easy enough to give it a try. 4.2 is plenty high anyway.astpaul wrote:As Graphics is the lowest and that I am currently using standard drivers I was wondering if by using the ones released by Lenovo, one would get a better performance score.
Any experience?
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Re: Performance score
I meant the ones provided in the Vista distrib.pianowizard wrote:I don't know what you mean by "standard drivers" but it's easy enough to give it a try. 4.2 is plenty high anyway.astpaul wrote:As Graphics is the lowest and that I am currently using standard drivers I was wondering if by using the ones released by Lenovo, one would get a better performance score.
Any experience?
You know one always tries to optimize
It seems that using Lenovo's drivers enhances the score a little bit.
T42, T60p
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8367
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: Performance score
So you tried it already? What's the new score?astpaul wrote:It seems that using Lenovo's drivers enhances the score a little bit.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
low rating from Vista
I did this as well with a desktop computer
video performance killed the score, why ?
my matrox 650 as well as laptop graphics cards, how good they are, are no high gamers cards with 512MB (not shared) and processor with cooling fan.
in laptops you can have the most fancy high end grphics cards but at a lower clockspeed. how can they keep them cool ?
do not use the full speed.
I think that this is the reason for the low score.
Sjoerd
video performance killed the score, why ?
my matrox 650 as well as laptop graphics cards, how good they are, are no high gamers cards with 512MB (not shared) and processor with cooling fan.
in laptops you can have the most fancy high end grphics cards but at a lower clockspeed. how can they keep them cool ?
do not use the full speed.
I think that this is the reason for the low score.
Sjoerd
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8367
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
I just found this on a Microsoft site concerning the graphics score:
between 3 and 4: runs Aero well
between 4 and 5: plays HD video well
5 and above: "great for all key windows Vista scenarios"
From another Microsoft site:
• A computer with a base score of 1 or 2 usually has sufficient performance to do most general computing tasks, such as run office productivity applications and search the Internet. However, a computer with this base score is generally not powerful enough to run Windows Aero, or the advanced multimedia experiences that are available with Windows Vista.
• A computer with a base score of 3 is able to run Windows Aero and many new features of Windows Vista at a basic level. Some of the new Windows Vista advanced features might not have all of their functionality available. For example, a machine with a base score of 3 can display the Windows Vista theme at a resolution of 1280 × 1024, but might struggle to run the theme on multiple monitors. Or, it can play digital TV content but might struggle to play High Definition Television (HDTV) content.
• A computer with a base score of 4 or 5 is able to run all new features of Windows Vista with full functionality, and it is able to support high-end, graphics-intensive experiences, such as multiplayer and 3‑D gaming and recording and playback of HDTV content. Computers with a base score of 5 were the highest performing computers available when Windows Vista was released.
between 3 and 4: runs Aero well
between 4 and 5: plays HD video well
5 and above: "great for all key windows Vista scenarios"
From another Microsoft site:
• A computer with a base score of 1 or 2 usually has sufficient performance to do most general computing tasks, such as run office productivity applications and search the Internet. However, a computer with this base score is generally not powerful enough to run Windows Aero, or the advanced multimedia experiences that are available with Windows Vista.
• A computer with a base score of 3 is able to run Windows Aero and many new features of Windows Vista at a basic level. Some of the new Windows Vista advanced features might not have all of their functionality available. For example, a machine with a base score of 3 can display the Windows Vista theme at a resolution of 1280 × 1024, but might struggle to run the theme on multiple monitors. Or, it can play digital TV content but might struggle to play High Definition Television (HDTV) content.
• A computer with a base score of 4 or 5 is able to run all new features of Windows Vista with full functionality, and it is able to support high-end, graphics-intensive experiences, such as multiplayer and 3‑D gaming and recording and playback of HDTV content. Computers with a base score of 5 were the highest performing computers available when Windows Vista was released.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
-
riverwater
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:25 pm
- Location: Albany, NY
I have a T60p with 256MB ATI FireGL V5200, graphic score only 4.2, the lowest one in all. I don't know how to improve it, since it is already the highend card.
T60p 2613-ENU: 2.13GHz, 2.0GB DDR2, 100GB 7200rpm, DVDRW, 15''IPS, 9-cell;
T40 2373-94U: 1.6 GHz, 1.0GB, 80GB 4200rpm, CDRW/DVD, 14'', 9-cell.
T40 2373-94U: 1.6 GHz, 1.0GB, 80GB 4200rpm, CDRW/DVD, 14'', 9-cell.
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8367
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
That probably means that at present, there isn't a single Thinkpad that's fully Vista capable.riverwater wrote:I have a T60p with 256MB ATI FireGL V5200, graphic score only 4.2, the lowest one in all. I don't know how to improve it, since it is already the highend card.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
z60m 3.6 Determined by lowest subscore
Processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz 3.9
Memory (RAM) 1.50 GB 4.4
Graphics MOBILITY RADEON X600 (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM) 3.7
Gaming graphics 639 MB Total available graphics memory 3.6
Primary hard disk 14GB Free (89GB Total) 4.2
So X600 is weakest link. I'm not using the ATi Beta drivers yet, although Microsoft did update their drivers which fixed a few crashes the other day. When ATi drivers go non-beta I may give them ago as that may offer better graphics performance.
Processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz 3.9
Memory (RAM) 1.50 GB 4.4
Graphics MOBILITY RADEON X600 (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM) 3.7
Gaming graphics 639 MB Total available graphics memory 3.6
Primary hard disk 14GB Free (89GB Total) 4.2
So X600 is weakest link. I'm not using the ATi Beta drivers yet, although Microsoft did update their drivers which fixed a few crashes the other day. When ATi drivers go non-beta I may give them ago as that may offer better graphics performance.
R61, Z60M, T61, T400, E540
-
brentpresley
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:19 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
- Processor : 5.2
- RAM: 4.7
- Graphics: 4.2
- Gaming: 4.6
- HDD: 5.0
Specs in sig.
- RAM: 4.7
- Graphics: 4.2
- Gaming: 4.6
- HDD: 5.0
Specs in sig.
Custom T60p
2.33GHz 4MB 667MHz Core 2 Duo
4GB PC2-5300 DDR SDRAM
Bluetooth / Atheros ABGN
200GB 7k200 7200RPM Hard Drive
8X DVD Multiburner
15" UXGA - ATI FireGL V5250 (256MB)
http://www.xcpus.com
2.33GHz 4MB 667MHz Core 2 Duo
4GB PC2-5300 DDR SDRAM
Bluetooth / Atheros ABGN
200GB 7k200 7200RPM Hard Drive
8X DVD Multiburner
15" UXGA - ATI FireGL V5250 (256MB)
http://www.xcpus.com
-
heyzeus123
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:01 pm
VISTA Performance Score for:
Thinkpad T60p 2613-HKU
2.0ghz T7200
ATI x1400 128mb
2gb RAM (dual channel)
7K100 80gb 7200rpm HD
Processor: 4.9
Memory: 4.5
Graphics: 4.6
Gaming Graphics: 4.0
Primary Hard Disk: 4.6
Does anybody knows why the Memory score is low with 2.0gb dual-channel memory? I expect a Memory score of 4.9 for a T60p with my specs.
Also, does anyone know if the Ultrabay SATA is slower than the built-in SATA port? That would explain the low HDD score (I expect a score of 5.1). BTW, I run my primary partition off the Ultrabay SATA adapter. Thanks in advance.
Note from Moderator: Duplicate thread.
Thinkpad T60p 2613-HKU
2.0ghz T7200
ATI x1400 128mb
2gb RAM (dual channel)
7K100 80gb 7200rpm HD
Processor: 4.9
Memory: 4.5
Graphics: 4.6
Gaming Graphics: 4.0
Primary Hard Disk: 4.6
Does anybody knows why the Memory score is low with 2.0gb dual-channel memory? I expect a Memory score of 4.9 for a T60p with my specs.
Also, does anyone know if the Ultrabay SATA is slower than the built-in SATA port? That would explain the low HDD score (I expect a score of 5.1). BTW, I run my primary partition off the Ultrabay SATA adapter. Thanks in advance.
Note from Moderator: Duplicate thread.
Thinkpad T60p 2613-HKU, 2.0ghz T7200, 14.1 SXGA+ BOE-Hydis LCD, Bluetooth 2.0, 2gb RAM (dual-channel), DVD+R, 7K100 80gb 7200rpm HD, Thinkpad Wi-Fi ABG, ATI x1400 128mb, 6 cell battery
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
T420: mSATA SSD performance issue [SOLVED]
by Farro » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:56 am » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 2 Replies
- 994 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:00 pm
-
-
- 4 Replies
- 998 Views
-
Last post by serpico
Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:27 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests



