comparison between Intel GMA900 & ATI 7800 64MB?

R, A, G and Z series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
rbi
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Sydney

comparison between Intel GMA900 & ATI 7800 64MB?

#1 Post by rbi » Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:49 am

I would like to run Ulead VideoStudio 10 and Office Ultimate 2007. Thanks.

rbi
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Sydney

#2 Post by rbi » Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:36 am

or ATI Radeon X300 and ATI FireGL™ 7800? both would be 64MB.

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#3 Post by dr_st » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:01 am

Does any of these applications use 3D acceleration? If not, then it shouldn't make a difference. However, the GMA is DirectX9 compliant, if I remember, while the 7800 isn't. This may be an advantage of the GMA. The X300 is also DX9 compliant, and significantly faster than the GMA and the 7800.

rbi
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Sydney

#4 Post by rbi » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:21 pm

That's really helpful thanks mate :D

scr71822
Sophomore Member
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Waukegan, IL

#5 Post by scr71822 » Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:59 pm

I think the issue with the 7800 and the 900 are they do not have vertex and pixel shaders which means gaming issues. The 7800 is the same core as the 7500 but with more memory. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad R, A, G and Z Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests